|
i would kill a burglar without a second thought. kill he/she dead. anyone that wouldnt deserves to be burgled
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2015 06:56 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 00:23 |
|
Orkin Mang posted:im just asking for an ontological grounding for the normative claims made by the aforemoentioned psoter i would as well, it was terribly ethnocentric
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2015 07:06 |
|
just execute throughly proven murderers one month past their sentencing and castrate convicted rapists. who cares, gently caress em
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 18:00 |
|
paragon1 posted:Yeah, I said basic moral principle, not basic human things. Basic human things have us all making GBS threads in caves and murdering and raping each other all the time. No thank you. notice i said thoroughly proven numb nuts
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 21:52 |
|
paragon1 posted:oh and who gets to set the standard for that dipshit? probably the loving judge. ill never understand the intrinsic aversion to the death penalty Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Yeah that's basically what we have already. What's the difference between "thoroughly" and "beyond a reasonable doubt" that would prevent things like what's happened? idk dna or something inarguable, red handed stuff
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 22:01 |
|
like my functional example is that texan farmer who killed the dude he caught molesting his daughter. that was good, and right, and good on him for having the stones to be a man about it
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 22:05 |
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:This is one of the more hilarious examples of an idiot's bare-faced misogyny I've seen this week. glad to oblige, ill have to up my game though because i wasnt really even trying
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2015 23:01 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 00:23 |
|
VitalSigns posted:He's not wrong. Exterminate all humans, it's the only sure way to stop human-on-human rape. Man up and end rape, you sissy liberal. im not advocating executing or even punishing innocent people, of course im not, but i dont see the issue with executing murderers of violent intent. somebody dies in a bar fight, lock the killer up for a time. somebody kills 3 in a home invasion, yeah thats death. execution should only be administered in retroactively provable situations. something that can be on record. dna, film, something that 100% incontrovertibly can be proven at any subsequent time. no witnesses, no firearm forensics, no et cetera and when they are proven guilty of red handed, purposeful murder, then the expedited execution should happen within a few days or weeks Mandy Thompson posted:I don't know about the specific example you are referring to, did he find the molester in the act and kill him or did he do it later? he caught him in the act and beat him to death
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2015 06:38 |