|
im piss 
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 06:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 14:37 |
|
|
Arglebargle III posted:It depends on what you mean by murder and social group, of course. yeah no poo poo thanks for the useless post
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 06:30
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:We are better than those societies. we who? what do we know that they dont? are we super enlightened? but by what? bunch of bs if u ask me. sentimental bs, full. stop.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 06:48
|
|
|
Exclamation Marx posted:Post better itt (in this thread) im just asking for an ontological grounding for the normative claims made by the aforemoentioned psoter
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 07:05
|
|
|
the very 'concept' that human lives have infinite value seems pretty against common sense to me. give me a shred of evidence for this one particular propositional declarative statement claim. practically speaking there is no lasting persuasion without mega truth.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 07:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 14:37 |
|
|
Scrub-Niggurath posted:who has said that they have infinite value its implicit in much secular humanist reasoning friend. no instrumental desiderata is enough to overcome the infinite value of the individual human life according to manys commonsense old bean
|
|
#
¿
Mar 20, 2015 07:18
|
|