|
cause that guy is trying to disprove objectification and male gaze because he thinks they are just fake reasons women came up with to be mad at hard working men who are just trying to make titty art
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2016 06:53
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 07:36 |
|
|
i can't believe the words women use to explain their experiences just so happen to fall into this guys list of meaningless buzzwords, what a weird coincidence
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2016 17:13
|
|
|
art critic: the men in manet's "luncheon on the grass" are painted in drab colors that cause them to fall away to the background, drawing the all male salon viewers focus to the naked women bathed in light. they become objects of voyeuristic pleasure while the two clothed gentlemen chat amongst themselves. scribblescratch: you just used all theses buzzwords cause you have no rebuttal to what i said
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2016 17:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2016 21:26
|
|
|
for a dude who keeps bemoaning the lack of content in this thread he sure does like posting misogynist garbage manifestos
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2016 22:58
|
|
|
that's not a critique, and neither was the time you told me to use a different brush
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 01:49
|
|
|
you write like an rear end
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 16:49
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:We were just talking about photos, silly. And you haven't said anything about my art recently. You say many times, but you really mean the one time. here is a small collection i have curated for you Troposphere posted:all your female anatomy looks like barbie dolls. if you're going to draw such blatant fap material at least change up the body types once in a while. that is My Opinion. Troposphere posted:I'm sorry, here let me rephrase: Troposphere posted:I really have no interest in being nice to men who constantly objectify women in their art. if you guys drew anything at all besides unrealistically sexy fetishized women in painful looking sexy poses constantly and had any interest whatsoever in drawing things that don't get you hot and bothered maybe I'd be kinder but as it stands, nah. Troposphere posted:so I'll repeat: please look at real women when you draw. cheesecake is fine and good but have a tiny shred of self awareness. there are so many male artists that flood the field with stuff like this and it's exhausting and depressing. Troposphere posted:my original complaint was that all of scribs women look like Barbie dolls, which I stand by. Troposphere posted:as long as the women in the art don't look like realdolls I'm usually fine with it Troposphere posted:my main qualm with you is, like I said, all your women have the same exact body type and it's not a realistic one. their waists are tiny and probably couldn't hold any of their vital organs, their torsos are super elongated (influence from the one piece guy probably?) and their boobs are huge and perpetually perky even when they aren't wearing bras. the angles you use usually shove boobs or rear end in the viewer's face. these are all things you can fix, and your art would be better for it.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 17:26
|
|
|
it's not really a grudge, it's more like talking to a brick wall, it's been made super obvious recently that he'd rather double down on his bullshit rather than listen to anyone else about anything that's why this dumb little event has been going on for days, and also why he still draws all his women the same
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 19:51
|
|
|
is that honestly what you got out of all this
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 20:48
|
|
|
as long as scribblescratch only draws that one body type for women i am going to comment on it, it's not some grudge or obsession, it's critique it's much weirder to me that a year later he still obstinately refuses to even try it, although i wan't expecting him to try and redefine the nature of critique and art to justify him never trying this time around
|
|
#
¿
Oct 7, 2016 21:57
|
|
|
OmanyteJackson posted:That's such a useless critique. if it actually was one. almost on the "i don't like that color" level. the wording doesn't matter because scribblescratch will attempt to rewrite history to justify not listening
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
OmanyteJackson posted:I'm just asking Please, try not to be so quick to judge is all I'm saying. OmanyteJackson posted:Has this poo poo really been going on for a year? A WHOLE loving YEAR? pick one
|
|
#
¿
Oct 8, 2016 01:08
|
|
|
 me reading this thread
|
|
#
¿
Oct 10, 2016 15:55
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 00:30
|
|
|
i'm not sure those are the right lyrics to that lady gaga song
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 03:31
|
|
|
hold on lemme bust out the rosetta stone to decode this
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 03:46
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 04:21
|
|
|
no, i think those words were important
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 04:30
|
|
|
check it out:
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 04:57
|
|
|
everyone: i don't know what you're trying to say, please clarify scribblescratch: weak own 1/10
|
|
#
¿
Oct 11, 2016 05:01
|
|
|
i've studied native south american art and also just did a brief search to make sure, but i didn't see any headwear that looked like that. you might've found something i didn't but i do think it would be lame if you just made up something "tribal" instead of referencing, cause maya and inca had some pretty sick headwear
|
|
#
¿
Oct 13, 2016 17:41
|
|
|
TeaMaestro posted:
course i would forget about the stirrup spout vessels
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2016 19:30
|
|
|
i like the panel where you can see the zoras rear end and crotch at the same time
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2016 20:47
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:I'm sorry your president elect is not to your liking. i don't know how you reached this or what it has to do with what i said, but i was being sincere  dog salon
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2016 20:24
|
|
|
Scribblehatch posted:Sincere is a very powerful word, and you're giving it a very weak and antithetical purpose. just because we've had our differences doesn't mean i don't want to gently caress ruto
|
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2016 23:29
|
|
|
x x
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2016 21:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Dec 12, 2016 22:43
|
|
|
Diabetes Forecast posted:Wait aren't you an rear end person? I forget. only the weak-hearted think it's either or
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2016 22:41
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 07:36 |
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2017 09:29
|
|