|
Just a short question- does the 20th Anniversary edition of V:tM's rules match with the newest nWoD ones? I'm going to try run a game for some mates next week, and while I mostly like the fluff and stuff for the lines, my nostalgia for the video game makes me want to keep the Malkavians, Toreadors etc. Also because part of me want to have the endgame being 'everyone against Ravnos/Tzimisce/Ravnos and Tzimisce's illegitimate Mary Sue daughter' or summat of the sort.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2015 23:59 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 19:24 |
|
GimpInBlack posted:You could also pick up the Vampire Translation Guide on DTRPG if you want a reference for converting oWoD concepts to nWoD rules. It's pre-second edition though, so it might not sync up 100% any more. Yeah, I think I'll do this. It'll be my first time running WoD, both old and new, so if I'm going to make any screwups, they might as well be official ones, thanks!
|
# ¿ May 10, 2015 04:10 |
|
So... I'm guessing that Demon (which as far as I know, was written by Onyx Path) is a crapfest then? Because everything I'm hearing about Beast is that it's rubbish.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2015 11:52 |
|
Huh, I haven't been keeping up with WoD stuff, and all I heard about Demon is 'Fallen Angels are Matrix Agents who've turned good'. Nice to hear it actually is something nice.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2015 12:36 |
|
jim truds posted:I feel like Beast would work if it wasn't all about embracing your beast side. You have to feed it but if you can feed it through small things, intentionally not harming others, you get rewarded. Falling all the way into being a monster leads to a loss of the human part of you. I think it would also make sense if the Beast was more like a Geist. It is part of your soul but is a lot older then you and you are not it's first ride. Isn't this kind of like Changeling the Lost, though? You can keep your Fae side in check and remain human, or you can go full-on Wyrd 10 and turn into Cute Elf Hitler.
|
# ¿ Jun 3, 2015 13:10 |
|
Okay, this might be a dumb question but what happens when a vampire drinks the blood of another supernatural? For some reason this question's been bugging me, and I'm not sure if I'd want to purchase a rulebook to find out
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2015 05:26 |
|
Thanks for the replies guys. For some reason, it's been bugging me for a bit.Daeren posted:All this talk and I totally forgot that in attempting to be socially considerate, they set up the accidental reading that LGBT people (and minorities, and all out-groups) are abusive sociopathic deviants that can at best sublimate their urges Who's that guy?
|
# ¿ Jun 4, 2015 11:32 |
|
Hell, do we even need 'heroes'? If we're going to crossover all and sundry with Beast, why not go for Slashers, albeit ones that target Beasts specifically? Yawgmoth posted:How is it that literally every goon idea for Beast has been better by miles than what we're actually getting? Like seriously I would have actually funded any of these ideas over what we got.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2015 05:59 |
|
paradoxGentleman posted:I dunno, in a game about playing monsters such as Grendel and Medusa, it seems thematically appropriate to have Heroes. Point taken; I'm just going by the basis of the general sentiment that Beasts are monsters, yet supposed to be the good guys- if that's the case, we'd need worse guys. For those who've been keeping up with the game, have they detailed Hero creation yet? Because I'd love to play Gaston.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2015 12:50 |
|
moths posted:The Heroes are only "Heroes" because the "Beast" needs them to be. Because to admit a regular person's power over you acknowledges just how weak and powerless you really are. The Friendly's manager who threw you out for scaring kids? He must be a Hero of legend along the lines of Beowulf or Gilgamesh. Surely no mortal woman could pepper spray you, YOU the Primordial embodiment of fear itself, for groping her on the street. Lairs are hoarder's basements filled with useless trinkets pilfered from recycle bins. You're not Smaug, you're a guy who has convinced himself he's Smaug because the alternative is too dreadful to consider. You've found others like you, who reinforce your delusions in a toxic support group. Yawgmoth posted:How is it that literally every goon idea for Beast has been better by miles than what we're actually getting? Like seriously I would have actually funded any of these ideas over what we got.
|
# ¿ Jun 6, 2015 18:21 |
|
I think Stephen King would write about an evil taxi, but do it competently. From a Buick 8 wasn't scary, but it was readable, and I found the central conceit one that inspired curiosity rather than fear. Beast on the other hand, inspires nothing but exasperation on a good day.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2015 04:35 |
|
I like the concept of all these supernatural powers having scientific explanations, but neuron guns are another thing entirely It's like trying to explain planetary formation using aether and miasma or something.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2015 06:18 |
|
Flavivirus posted:Yup. At this point I'd have to disagree with the person who said Beasts would get on with Seers and the Pure - that's the wrong category of antagonists. Beasts are more like the Strix, the Maeljin, or Abyssal intruders - terrifying entities that exist only to degrade and devour and whose very existence is a blight on the world. Don't forget the True Fae! Seriously, reading about the Beasts and the poo poo they put people through is reminding me more of the True Fae than even the Changeling books.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2015 11:52 |
|
Daeren posted:Maybe that's just wishful thinking on my end because I really love a game where I can yell WELCOME TO YOUR DOOM and flourish my comically oversized black-and-red cape. I loved doing this in Exalted as an Infernal- any other games that do this? Better Angels is one that I know of, anything else? Daeren posted:Like for real, aside from the bizarrely high power level of everything, a lot of the conceits of the mechanics of things like Lairs and Kinship Nightmares and poo poo are pretty novel, and I really enjoy how they work even if I don't always like what they do. Someone else in the thread said it
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2015 16:27 |
|
Night10194 posted:Also this thread is making me think that as well as Hunter, Changeling might very well be for me, too. It's basically normal people taken by hosed up horror faeries and turned into something inhuman who escape and try to stay escaped, while trying to deal with their trauma, yes? Changeling owns, Daemon (now that I've bought it) owns too, get both they're amazing. That being said, I still like Changeling better, and I'd kill for an IRL game. Yawgmoth posted:I can't speak for RPG.net but OPP posters are by and large the best examples of Beast sample characters outside of an otherkin tumblr so I can't imagine that they are concerned with anything in the book. From what I've seen, 4chan's surprisingly 50/50; I'd have thought they'd be all for it.
|
# ¿ Jun 7, 2015 23:53 |
|
What the gently caress? What the gently caress How How does anyone defend this? WHY would anyone defend or write this poo poo? I sincerely regret buying Demon now, instead of pirating a pdf. I don't care how ineffective it it, I'm spreading the damned word everywhere I can. OPP doesn't deserve money for this, McFarland needs to be thrown out on an asphalt road.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 02:45 |
|
Effectronica posted:It's amazing how Beast just keeps getting shittier and shittier, but with a clearly visible trend throughout. I mean Jesus. It's like, Demon was written by a fully-functioning adult with the tastes therof, while Beast was written by a manchild who still hasn't gotten over the jerk jocks (seriously, were those ever a thing outside 80s movies?) in high/secondary school. It's like reading Dominic Deegan all over again.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 02:50 |
|
The True Fae, as mentioned. The Autumn Court would say that beasts aren't just missing the point, but are being an active threat who deserve a nice, long Summer.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 03:28 |
|
Mexcillent posted:lol you guys are still posting about this subpar anti bullying changeling rip off I know, right? It's like a trainwreck involving kittens and jelly beans- a horrible mess of something that could and should have been good, but you can't help but look at and discuss now. EDIT: Spelling.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 04:28 |
|
Something else I've found. Look at this horrible no-goodnik of a Hero:quote:Sleeping Beauty Who knew the most thing in a game about playing Cthulhu was a teenage girl in a coma? Seriously, THIS is a PC I want to play, even if she's supposed to be the bad guy. EDIT: Proof that she's an evil bitchwhore who deserves all she gets: quote:The Hero has expectations. Forget his delusions and his ego, and even forget the monster that made him a zealot in the first place. It’s not the Beast who taught him how the tale is told. He goes to the movies; he reads books; he plays video games. His culture’s rammed the plot into him since he could understand words. The story belongs to him. RPG.net weighs in: http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?757990-Beast-ish-Do-the-antagonists-need-to-be-less-sympathetic-than-the-PCs&p=19074975#post19074975 Someone else sum it up, I'm too busy being pumped about how Melanie is to get mad. CommissarMega fucked around with this message at 04:58 on Jun 8, 2015 |
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 04:55 |
|
Someone help me, because upon reading this for a second time:quote:Melanie fell into the coma after an enterprising Collector sought her out to take God-knows-what from her in order to feed his own hoard. Then again, it makes Melanie all the more heroic for doing what she did AND WHY CAN'T WE PLAY AS HEROES AGAIN?!
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 05:08 |
|
Night10194 posted:I would play this character in a heartbeat. What the hell is wrong with someone who fought back against her attacker, won, and now quests to return to her family by fighting the horrors that put her in hell? That's what's wrong! She didn't lie down and sympathise with the poor widdle Beast, who just wanted take what was rightfully theirs! But seriously though, Hunter: Beasthunters/Dream Commandos would own so much.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 05:38 |
|
'Young man' might not necessarily mean a 20 year-old dude, it might as well refer to a 16-18 year-old. But hell, a middle-aged man stealing candy from kids deserves a stern-talking to and maybe some shaming on social media at most, not being suffocated and then mind-raped into being a sociopath that you kill for bonus XP.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 05:45 |
|
Omnicrom posted:So Beast is going to become the new version of chapters 1 and 2 of the 2e Infernal Exalted splatbook. It's worse; Infernals added a lot to Exalted, and Chapters 1&2™ were disjointed enough that they could easily be removed without affecting much. Infernals also presented a whole new paradigm to Exalted- where the Solars and other splats were all about being a shinier human, Infernals were all about transcending the human condition to be come something else. Beast? It's all about being an rear end in a top hat. Seriously, when your sample antagonists range from nerd, to MRA nightmare, to teenage girl in a coma questing through the Realm of Nightmare to get home to her parents, you're either a pissant threat or butt buddies with the True Fae.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 06:05 |
|
Kurieg posted:Beasts need a reason to exist given in the text, a justification for the crimes they commit. If all their murdering, torturing, and owning people on the basketball court with the power of existential dread is simply for their own self perpetuation then they don't have a leg to stand on in the "mean hero won't just lay there and take it" argument. Honestly, I for one would like Beasts more if they were unrepentantly dickish. Maybe you want to be Snidely Whiplash, maybe you want to be O'Brien from 1984. Whatever, you're a bad guy, the worst of the worst, go forth and do your thing. Slashers are playable, after all.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 14:30 |
|
MonsieurChoc posted:On 4chan, DaveB said some of his fellow developers believe balance is a myth. Maybe they meant that it's so hard to attain (especially with lines as divergent as the WoD's) it might as well be mythical? I can certainly see that, but only because each line has its own thing.
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2015 16:43 |
|
Roland Jones posted:Yes, RPG.net moderation is just terrible. That Matt McFarland is a mod there himself probably further adds to the confusion people have over this. Seriously? Talk about your conflict of interest. What really gets me is how none of them seem to have realized that in endorsing Beast's worldview, they are actually endorsing the people who've bullied them. I dislike Nezumi-chan on that board not because she's trans and/or autistic, I dislike her because she's endorsing the worldview shared by people who bully (to say the least) trans and autistic people. Hell, by taking on that worldview, in game terms wouldn't that make her a Hero™?
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2015 14:40 |
|
You know, the game could be much better, both in quality and potential sales potential if they made the narrative itself the villain. Beasts and Heroes create each other, and it's useless to say which came first (think 'chicken or the egg'). Under normal circumstances, a Beast comes along, does nasty poo poo, and is slain by a Hero. Okay, cool- but it's a lovely deal for Beasts, since they were regular, normal working Joes and Janes who've suddenly been conscripted into some kind of crazy metaplot for unknown reasons (maybe the God-Machine likes lovely fantasy, who knew), and at the end, they have to die. Thing is, Heroes would have a lovely time of it too. Look at King Arthur, slain by his son, while his wife cheats on him with his best friend. Luke Skywalker lost his dad to the dark side, and his adoptive parents to friggin' stormtroopers. Peter Parker also lost his uncle. A Hero's emergence is heralded by chaos, death and destruction, often to his closest relatives and loved ones because that provides both a heroic catalyst and ratings gold-drama. Maybe some sociopaths are cool with this, but people like Melanie? No loving way she's going to take this lying down (metaphorically, I mean). So start off your sourcebook with Beasts, because maybe they were the first to look at the narrative and say 'gently caress this poo poo', but later on you can expand the line to include Heroes, because while Ye Olde Age™ Heroes might have been okay with loved ones dying left and right, what with the Crusades and plagues and all, and having an easily-blameable Beast right there, as time went by they too began to look at the Narrative and decide it's poo poo. BAM! Second sourcebook, holla holla mo' nerd dolla, hire me now OPP. LatwPIAT posted:Matthew McFarland being a moderator on a forum where games being made by the company he works for are discussed means there's a conflict of interest between McFarland and those discussions, not the moderation staff as a whole. Yeah, that was what I was referring to, sorry if I was unclear.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2015 15:07 |
|
spectralent posted:Oh wow I bailed out of the RPGnet thread when it became obvious that I was headbutting a brick wall with increasing force, but in response to "Melanie is only a teenage girl" someone posted: Worst part is? In Beast, you'd play the murderers. But yeah, trying to equate Melanie with those two is not just reaching, you're trying to pull something you've seen through the Hubble Telescope. Good God, I think bringing them is as an example is showing disrespect to everyone involved.
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2015 16:50 |
|
The original text mentions she's still a teenager after 2 years in a coma, so she could have been up to 16 years old when she went all However, since 16 is the legal age of consent in some states, that means she was a legal adult who must have willfully gone after a poor creature that was only fulfilling its narrative and biological imperatives. Thank God she's in a coma, otherwise she'd be looting and murdering and raping everything with a pulse! Goddamn Beast. EDIT: Here's the original text. quote:Sleeping Beauty
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2015 17:06 |
|
poo poo, this is a hell of a thing to hear in an elfgame thread
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2015 15:39 |
|
Androc posted:Suddenly, I want to play a board game about being Cheiron Group board members. Has there been any 'canon' explanation for what they are? Or is it all ST fiat? I'm thinking a bunch of ancient, retired Hunters; hell, they might be the people who started the other Conspiracies, with the Lucifuge, that guy from the Church etc. all chillin' and making boardroom deals.
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2015 23:49 |
|
Soonmot posted:I don't think the huntsmen dillute the True Fae at all, as I don't think the True Fae should be anything less than a force of nature that you will never beat, only survive. Same here. Honestly, one of the things that bothered me about 1e was that the True Fae had to come down and get you etc. Now sure, maybe there's one TF here and there who'd like to get their hands dirty, but from what I saw, life in Arcadia as one of the 1% is pretty good;. Why would I want to leave my harem of dragon-winged catgirls to kidnap or take back some dumb mortal when I can get some goon to do it?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2015 09:00 |
|
Crion posted:Because the entire narrative engine that 1E ran off of was the exceedingly terrifying personal relationship between the Changeling and their Keeper. They were, very intentionally, not 1% capitalist overlord/business executive stand-ins who don't get their hands dirty. This is like the weird reverse of ruminating on why the Exarchs in Mage don't pop down from the Realms Supernal to deal with troublesome Pentacle cabals themselves. The True Fae aren't Exarchs, and making them knockoff Exarchs served by knockoff Seers with a slight aesthetic change would do both lines a disservice. Huh, good point. I'll admit that never occurred to me. Maybe then Huntsmen are like pieces of a Fae? Bits of consciousness sent to do menial work when you're too busy having tea with the Duchess of Etcetera?
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2015 18:12 |
|
Wales Grey posted:I don't disagree with you, it's definitely a move for the better, but there's still the underlying current of "The People You Torture/Torment Need And Deserve To Be Taught A Lesson". Yeah, I'm in the same boat. The Heroes section I feel, will be the place to make or break Beast. Would Melanie look like a hero, or a Hero™? What about Fedora, is he still supposed to be an actual threat or the pathetic tit he actually is? A revised intro does not a game line make.
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2015 04:05 |
|
Cryophage posted:Sorry, should have been clearer with my original query: I get why the the game designers are pushing the naming convention, but I'm not clear on what the in-universe justification is. Didn't it have something to do with the power of True Names and such? If you know Winter Harrow's true name is Rob Robertson, then your spells and such are more powerful. I also recall one character in the demo whose Keeper would be summoned if you repeat her True Name three times. At higher levels of Wyrd, some bans and taboos also rely on knowing your True Name.
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2015 09:35 |
|
Yeah, in most cases you have protagonists that run the gamut from kinda-on-the-good-side (e.g. The Union, Obrimos and Thyrsus mages, maybe the Carthians) to the definitely-grey-area sorts (Guardians of the Veil, Changelings, Crones), but Beast's problem was that you could only play assholes, the game style only rewarded assholes, and your enemies were all strawmen- incompetently done strawmen at that.
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2015 17:14 |
|
I've just bought myself the Awakening core book- is it just me, or are Acanthus mages surprisingly awesome? My only experience with Mage thus far has been bumming a read of my friend's books once in a while, and the impression of the Acanthus I got was that they're all lolrandum hippies. Then I read about them, and daaamn, their Fate magic is surprisingly potent, and I kind of want to play one now. I also thought Obrimos would be cool, what with lightning and stuff, but now that I'm familiar with Paradox rules, they seem the weakest of all mages since most of their spells (or at least, what I can see from a cursory skim) are vulgar. Or maybe it's just that I'm not much of a planner, and I can't set up the Rube Goldbergian maze I'd need to be an effective Obrimos- I'd rather much have the Acanthus's rerolls, +dice and stuff to use when I need to.
|
# ¿ Jun 18, 2015 16:47 |
|
Poltergrift posted:Now that I think of it, they are kind of opposite principles defined by their relationships to Belle. Gaston's antagonism to the Beast is based on his desired relationship to the object of their mutual weird affections, and vice-versa. CommissarMega posted:You know, the game could be much better, both in quality and potential sales potential if they made the narrative itself the villain. Beasts and Heroes create each other, and it's useless to say which came first (think 'chicken or the egg'). Under normal circumstances, a Beast comes along, does nasty poo poo, and is slain by a Hero. Okay, cool- but it's a lovely deal for Beasts, since they were regular, normal working Joes and Janes who've suddenly been conscripted into some kind of crazy metaplot for unknown reasons (maybe the God-Machine likes lovely fantasy, who knew), and at the end, they have to die. And I'm sure I wasn't the only one to think along those lines earlier. It's a real contrast, reading Beast stuff and comparing it to Demon, which to me is somehow even more superhero-themed than Mage. I mean, what are Beast's protagonists? An old lady who strangles kids (oh, wait, frat boys) because they stole candy and a hermit who goes after loving couples to 'make the rest value their relationships better' (probably through frantic fearsex or something?). Meanwhile I'm counting at least 2 characters in the Demon books (one in the irto fiction, even) who fell because they fell in love with a human, and one more who fell because they loved their adopted family. And then Heirs to Hell has perhaps the most touching piece of writing the WoD has to offer: Demon: The Fallen posted:A Fractal child isn’t afraid of her father’s red skin and metal eyes. A Fractal child doesn’t care how many scales made out of pennies her mother has instead of hair. That’s just mom and dad, and they are, to the Fractal, perfect.
|
# ¿ Jun 28, 2015 05:21 |
|
|
# ¿ May 19, 2024 19:24 |
|
Axelgear posted:Worth noting that this is the same God-Machine that possibly created humanity solely to mine uranium. "Simple and direct" is a phrase that seems to be anathema to it. Personally, I think the G-M's basically broken at this point, a more sinister Friend Computer. It's got all these directives, but thanks to the WoD being the WoD, now they're all clashing against each other and what passes for intelligence in the G-M is like a druggie on a rollacoaster in an earthquake- hanging on for dear life and going "Wheeee!" while everything dies. Yeah, your rebellion may serve the Master Plan, but the Master Plan serves nobody, so might as well take care of your wife and kids while waiting for the whole rotten superstructure to fall down.
|
# ¿ Jun 29, 2015 06:59 |