|
poo poo.
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 01:26
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 15:45 |
|
|
Oh, took me awhile to get this joke. I had to scroll down to see the punchline on my 1366x768 monitor.
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 01:33
|
|
|
appears to be 1073676. glad i could help op. gas and ban
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
pram posted:appears to be 1073676. glad i could help op. gas and ban mods ban this chucklefuck
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:19
|
|
|
it's like 61500/45 x 34600/45 idk man I guess it's supposed to be a lovely 16:9 thing that doesn't loving work
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:38
|
|
|
ｓａｔａｎ＇ｓ ｒｅｓ
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:45
|
|
|
to clarify. assuming both numbers are in base ten and not sixteen or something and x indicates the binary multiplication operation as is standard in the integer ring then the answer is 1049088. op did I understand you correctly
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 02:52
|
|
|
bump_fn posted:to clarify. assuming both numbers are in base ten and not sixteen or something and x indicates the binary multiplication operation as is standard in the integer ring then the answer is 1049088. op did I understand you correctly "integer ring" sounds awkward because there's "ring of integers"" which Z is not (algebra terminology amirite) so you should've said integral domain instead imo
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:00
|
|
|
its a large number
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:12
|
|
|
perhaps too large to accurately calculate
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:14
|
|
|
Symbolic Butt posted:"integer ring" sounds awkward because there's "ring of integers"" which Z is not (algebra terminology amirite) this is why I'm not a mathematician but yeah \mathds{Z}
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:27
|
|
|
pram posted:perhaps too large to accurately calculate dont talk about yer mum like that
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 03:28
|
|
|
integer ring is just a synonym for promise ring
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 06:45
|
|
|
i don't really get why anyone cares about the difference between 16:9 and 16:10
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 16:03
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i don't really get why anyone cares about the difference between 16:9 and 16:10 because one is like 69, which is a sex move only a non sexhaver wouldn't know this
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
16:10 means you bought a good monitor 16:9 means you bought a rebranded TV
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 16:10
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:i don't really get why anyone cares about the difference between 16:9 and 16:10 I don't, I just care that 1366x768 isn't in the 16:9 ratio exactly
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:42
|
|
|
what is 5120x2880?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
Sniep posted:what is 5120x2880? the resolution of my phone screen
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Valeyard posted:the resolution of my phone screen i doubt that unless you are using facetime on your imac
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
this is a trick question, it's 1 right?
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 19:52
|
|
|
Sniep posted:what is 5120x2880? 14745600
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 20:05
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:16:10 means you bought a good monitor Yeah, it's not really the ratio itself but the fact that 99% of 16:9 panels are cheap as hell because they're going to be tvs. Source: my monitor is 1920x1680 and has only hdmi in and built in speakers 
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 21:04
|
|
|
Sniep posted:what is 5120x2880? it's u
|
|
#
?
Apr 11, 2015 21:48
|
|
|
maniacdevnull posted:1920x1680
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
bump_fn posted:14745600 thank you.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:44
|
|
|
4096x2160
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:48
|
|
|
funny resolution
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 00:49
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:16:10 means you bought a good monitor lol u think I bothered with a rebranded TV? mine is litrrally a 40" TV
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:05
|
|
|
dpi wise... 1920 across at 40" is like 960across at like 20" so the 1024x768 17" I had years ago had higher dpi so it's probably not far away from a 14" with 640x480  the lowest dpi in YOSPOS
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:07
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:16:10 means you bought a good monitor so uh, let's see here 5120:2880 is 16:9 what rebranded TV did i get here???
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 03:10
|
|
|
Sniep posted:so uh, let's see here 
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:06
|
|
|
no thats the same brand i want to know what 27" tv panel has this res that is sold as a tv
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:07
|
|
|
cool transparency on this img
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 04:59
|
|
|
Last Chance posted:cool transparency on this img only the finest first results on google images for the pos
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 06:02
|
|
|
I am undone.
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 14:07
|
|
|
Sweevo posted:16:10 means you bought a good monitor ~~only the finest pixels can grace my eyes~~
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 14:11
|
|
|
A Wheezy Steampunk posted:~~only the finest pixels can grace my eyes~~ agreed, ips or nothing
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 14:15
|
|
|
the best resolution is 2304 x 1440
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 14:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 3, 2024 15:45 |
|
|
I don't remember any of my new years resolutions
|
|
#
?
Apr 12, 2015 21:28
|
|