|
I'm excited to vote for Hillary because it means Bill will be "First Man" and get into all kinds of wacky hijinks.
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 16:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 05:33 |
|
|
Universe Master posted:"wacky hijinks" is a funny way to spell 20 year old interns. Yeah, and?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:00
|
|
|
GORDON posted:I don't really care either way because they're all pieces of poo poo, but what is it like to be the kind of person that whenever the media reports something negative about a democrat, the line is, "LOL at the things the GOP pursues?" Do you think the GOP is running the free media? I mean, you know democrats are crooked pieces of poo poo right alongside the republicans, right? Is it like my gramma and her religious stuff? God has a reason for errything so Hillary has a reason for trashing all her emails and it's good for us? Both sides right? The truth is in the middle.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
Khanstant posted:I don't mind Hilary but man I don't want to hear about this for 2 more years. Plus it's the red team's turn anyway, so no matter what we're getting a red guy for 8 years. democrats dont actually think they get the presidency again do they? There's little chance of a Republican beating Clinton. Barring some huge controversy, Hillary will be president for the next 8 years.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
Universe Master posted:If Clinton is the candidate we'll have the lowest turnout of any modern election. The elephants have nobody, but maybe even nobody can win with only old white people voting. Disagree. Hillary will energize a unique voter base - for example, she'll probably win West Virginia whereas Obama never had a chance. But you're right about the Repukes - they've got nothing. Jeb Bush would theoretically be the best of these freaks, but he's an idiot too and his name should be toxic.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
Khanstant posted:Look that'd be marginally less bad than having a red skull in office, but it's their freaking turn. I bet you a detailed drawing of Hilary slaying her GOP contenders if she wins. It can't happen, no blue rear end will take the presidential throne again this decade. I'd be willing to bet real money you're wrong. Hillary will be the next president. There's no dynamic of "taking turns" when it comes to the Presidency.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Universe Master posted:bill is gonna gently caress some campaign worker and blow everything up. I feel like this would be a plus, not a negative.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
Khanstant posted:there has been my entire life, the only verifiable period of history. i'd bet money if I had any, that's why i wagered a drawing. If there was a viable Republican candidate I'd probably agree with you. But, alas...
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
NihilismNow posted:As if there is even a difference between political parties, especially in the USA. There's a huge difference. One party sincerely tries to run the government as best as possible. The other party is a literal radical group of extremists who seek nothing other than destroying current American society.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 18:08
|
|
|
Lawman 0 posted:The democrats are about as good as your posts. Democrats mostly suck, it's true. But again, they are sincerely trying to run the government as best as they can, as opposed to a party of radical extremists. I used to be a Republican, so I get it. I get the whole spiel. So believe me when I say they've gone loving crazy and anyone who supports any republican is contributing not only to the destruction of America, but the destruction of this world.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 18:57
|
|
|
Lee Harvey Oswald posted:scott walker is vacuous enough to be the gop candidate Well, by default, any Republican will get 40% of the vote. It could literally be Reagan's dessicated corpse running for office and he'd get 40% of the vote right off the bat. The next 11% is the difference between your typical retarded Republican and someone who can pretend to care.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
Khanstant posted:I mean, it's not like Big Business actually has anything to worry about from Dems. Generally, true. But Dems do put some limits on Big Business and thus will never be the favored party of the rich. Dems support Unions, just for example.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 19:13
|
|
|
Khanstant posted:supports unions? unless there's some sprectral unions I don't know about, that whole thing was as good as dead the day we discovered computers and poor people overseas Dems support unions. Do you disagree? Sure, Billy Clinton outsourced the entire American manufacturing sector, but still supported unions.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
Dr Cheeto posted:how many states will suddenly become quite concerned about in-person voter fraud months before the general election About 25 of them.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 19:33
|
|
|
Khanstant posted:i mean, i guess, but i don't think you can really support something that doesnt exist. dems also support deathcamps, but those also dont exist so it only matters if union is one of your trigger words Deathcamps?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 19:44
|
|
|
Helical Nightmares posted:One moderately serious question though. I'd guess not as high as Obams but still crazy high.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 20:09
|
|
|
etalian posted:Best thing is how Hillary supporters created the birther movement during the nasty primary fight. Indeed. Hillaryis44 or whatever that terrible site was named. Racist fucks.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 20:11
|
|
|
Idiot Kicker posted:- Redshirt, December 15, 2007 I was donating money to Obama back then. Remember those threads, goons?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 20:32
|
|
|
Yeah like credit card terms weren't completely changed thanks to Senator Warren. #bothsides
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2015 22:35
|
|
|
Monstrous Dooklord posted:This isn't politics lol - I cannot believe how many goons just spout this poo poo daily especially when faced with the fact you're voting for an horrible candidate "TCH, BETTER THAN THE OTHER GUY!!". Politics is about voting for candidates, not your lovely team. Both teams are literal gently caress nuggets; Republicans can't lead the country anymore because they're loving crazy and Democrats can't run the country because they're shiftless shitheads who can't accomplish anything. Guess what kind of motivation knowing the other party is running unelectable morons is?? The United States is essentially now a one party system and the party left is selling out goons futures and monitoring their porn habbits & phone calls and ensuring all the 100's of 1000's of jobs created are at Gas Stations and Starbucks. This is why everything is just lol, even more lol if you actually vote for this stupid bitch and keep sucking the status quo cock like a good little robot Fight the power man! Don't vote!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 00:28
|
|
|
Concerned Citizen posted:libya was obama's biggest foreign policy error Totally because Libya is now a.....
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 00:40
|
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:also shes just as right wing on foreign policy issues so Is there anyone pure enough for you, Comrade?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 04:20
|
|
gently caress it
|
TEAYCHES posted:seriously not cool with threats against states which should be our friends, and seriously not cool with the friendly relationship between the Clintons and the Egyptian tyranny. gently caress Israel.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 04:45
|
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:the only thing we agree on There's many other things we agree on, but your naive radicalism blinds you to these truths.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 05:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 05:33 |
|
|
TEAYCHES posted:you believe in nothing I believe in power as the only real currency in this world. Your naive beliefs in - what? - are literal delusional.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2015 05:06
|
|