|
TEAYCHES posted:i know none of you actually want to, but you should force yourself to actually watch the video: I watched this video earlier today and I can't remember a second of it (outside of the woman flexing while holding her kid but that's because I just saw it again).
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 00:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 14:40 |
|
|
etalian posted:When you factor in everything the most recent presidental election cost $1 billion dollars. It was probably closer to about $1 billion per major party, so double that. Clinton's team are aiming for $2.5 billion by themselves. The Republican nominees are busy right now, not just with regular donors but trying to get sugar daddies like Sheldon Adelson to basically single-handedly finance their primary campaigns (this is why Newt Gingrich in 2012...happened at all) before they go onto the general where they'll certainly be able to keep pace with the Clinton team. ... =I
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 02:34
|
|
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:A coworker told me today that Hillary "would have us in a shootin' war in 6 months" if elected because she'd have to in order to project strength to world since she's a womerns. Sanders is probably going to run. It'll be interesting to see: - how serious Hillary takes him - if he'll actually try to push anything on Hillary to bring those issues to the forefront - how Rahm Emanuel will go about murdering him
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 03:34
|
|
|
Monstrous Dooklord posted:he's not going to run, sorry He said by the end of the month, so, we'll see. He certainly isn't going to win the nomination either way but he strikes me a bit of the Kucinich-esque "gently caress it I'll give it a shot" type. spacemang_spliff posted:kerry got 90%  Ever since Goldwater basically.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2015 05:56
|
|