Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Blue Raider
Sep 2, 2006

i feel a confederacy would be better suited op

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Blue Raider
Sep 2, 2006

Avalanche posted:

Ok... ok....

Let's say the US breaks up. What regions get exactly what and what regions can actually stand on their own without any outside imports?
If the entire world decided to shut off all imports to America, it would really really suck and destroy everyone's present standard of living but wouldn't entirely doom the country. We can grow our own food, fish for our own food, and generate/mine resources for our own power (to an extent).

Can the People's Republic of Montana survive on its own? How about Hawaii? Wyoming? Nevada? Rhode Island? Yea, probably not. California's going to own everyone and turn the entire western boarder of Nevada into a Maginot Line of minefields and anti aircraft missile silos (assuming someone doesn't shut off the water first) while charging the rest of the nation $10/gallon for milk.

If a confederation was to come about, you can sure as poo poo be certain that the regions that dominate with food harvesting/production and natural resources are going to extort the ever living gently caress out of other regions since there is no one to stop them from doing so. And that's how wars happen and lots of people die.

the south will rise again

  • Locked thread