|
JnnyThndrs posted:I'm only an amateur historian, but my recollection is that both Germany and Japan had elements of democracy before WWII - the Weimar Republic was a parliamentary democracy and Japan also had an elected body of representatives - in practice the Emperor was not an absolute ruler. There were also political considerations. One of the proposed solutions in Iraq was to split it up into 3 states, with the Shia, the Shiites, and the Kurds, each having their own states. But setting up an independent Kurdish state would have royally pissed off Turkey, which has been fighting Kurdish separatist groups like the PKK for decades, so setting up an independent Kurdistan in Turkey's back yard wasn't really diplomatically feasible.
|
# ¿ Apr 19, 2015 10:10 |
|
|
# ¿ May 12, 2024 11:44 |
|
icantfindaname posted:They're not particularly liberal compared to developed countries, but they are compared to Iraq, Iran, or Saudi Arabia. Maybe not Pakistan, but Turkey at least Turkey is an oddball case where the military has historically been more Westernized than the general public, and has had veto powers over civilian authority since Ataturk. Any politician that went too extremist going too Communist or too Religious, risked the wrath of the military, and could expect a coup, followed by general elections set by the generals. It was not a great system for Democracy, but it did provide something approximating checks and balances. Erdogan has used his time in power to replace everybody that might oppose him and shut down all independent press. On paper Turkey is a democracy, in actual practice, not so much.
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2015 09:18 |