Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
thrakkorzog
Nov 16, 2007

JnnyThndrs posted:

I'm only an amateur historian, but my recollection is that both Germany and Japan had elements of democracy before WWII - the Weimar Republic was a parliamentary democracy and Japan also had an elected body of representatives - in practice the Emperor was not an absolute ruler.

As for the failure of democracy in Iraq/Afghanistan, you could easily write volumes about it, but the short answer is a lack of nationalism - to hold a democracy together, the citizens must be loyal to their country over all, not their region/religious faction(Iraq) or local leader/warlord(Afghanistan).

For a successful democracy, you also need a strong middle class, a reasonably educated populace, and a decent infrastructure - you can't just install a type of government and expect it to flourish, something that US leaders/policy makers either don't understand or don't care about.

There were also political considerations. One of the proposed solutions in Iraq was to split it up into 3 states, with the Shia, the Shiites, and the Kurds, each having their own states. But setting up an independent Kurdish state would have royally pissed off Turkey, which has been fighting Kurdish separatist groups like the PKK for decades, so setting up an independent Kurdistan in Turkey's back yard wasn't really diplomatically feasible.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

thrakkorzog
Nov 16, 2007

icantfindaname posted:

They're not particularly liberal compared to developed countries, but they are compared to Iraq, Iran, or Saudi Arabia. Maybe not Pakistan, but Turkey at least

Turkey is an oddball case where the military has historically been more Westernized than the general public, and has had veto powers over civilian authority since Ataturk. Any politician that went too extremist going too Communist or too Religious, risked the wrath of the military, and could expect a coup, followed by general elections set by the generals. It was not a great system for Democracy, but it did provide something approximating checks and balances.

Erdogan has used his time in power to replace everybody that might oppose him and shut down all independent press. On paper Turkey is a democracy, in actual practice, not so much.

  • Locked thread