|
Bape Culture posted:I car
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 12:12 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 16:07 |
|
Bape Culture posted:Ah okay. I thought their main function was to eliminate vortices? I know you've described that on the trunk lid, clean rejoin with the under flow but what about wing vortexes? A larger wing with a given angle of attack will give you more downforce. If you are not allowed a larger wing because of race regs or whatever, you can crank up the angle. At some point the flow over the top and botton of the wing will start separating. A Gurney flap helps you avoid this. If you are allowed a larger wing, use a larger wing to achieve the greater downforce. But listen to Jamal (and others). His actual performance improvement work beats out academic stuff I half-remember from nearly fifteen years ago.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 20:58 |
|
I agree, either do a full build on a rough used (cheap) engine, or buy a new one (with a warranty?) and just use it. If you keep the fluids in it, have it running an appropriate map, and use it within its design parameters, it should be fine.
|
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 20:16 |
|
Will it still go that far back when built up with heads etc?
|
# ¿ Nov 10, 2016 22:45 |
|
I mean, it's a thing, in that some cars do have a noticeably further-back engine location compared to other front engined cars, and it is a definite benefit in polar moment terms, you can't argue with the physics. But I find the existence of the term "front mid-engined", and debate over what does and doesn't count, to be rather inane.
|
# ¿ Nov 11, 2016 02:37 |
|
Raluek posted:Is it any worse than "rear engine" vs "rear mid-engine"? kimbo305 posted:I'm sure when the Corvette or Viper engineers were doing their initial briefs on the design, everyone in the room perfunctorily nodded when the lead mentioned "front mid-engined" and then went about their business.
|
# ¿ Nov 11, 2016 21:33 |
|
Seminal Flu posted:Nothing bad, just lots of things getting hit with your swinging LS dong.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2017 03:52 |
|
IOwnCalculus posted:"Oh, he's just going to take it easy around the parking lo..." http://i.imgur.com/PSwhLkX.mp4
|
# ¿ Feb 17, 2017 00:41 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKnvEvrI0Go
|
# ¿ Mar 8, 2017 21:10 |
|
Bape Culture posted:I made 500hp and 575nm. That's on a stingy dyno on crap fuel with no miles. I'll run it again in the summer on 99ron and see where we're at. Exciting stuff! I'm not going to ask you to talk about money directly, but I assume this conversion has stood you less than a new (or as-new rebuilt) 6-pot taken up to the same level?
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2017 23:52 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 16:07 |
|
He aitn't ded. I think.
|
# ¿ Sep 30, 2017 01:52 |