|
crawlkill posted:Usually when I find a story inscrutable I find it easy to take refuge in the mental shelter of assuming the author was just bullshitting, but somehow that's not the takeaway I had from Hal Duncan's "Vellum" when I chugged the audiobook a year or two ago. It's got a sort of multiverse premise, but unusually for such stories, it seems to be more about mirrors of the same characters from world to world than it is a voyage between worlds (although one of those is going on in parallel)? And I think that characters' reflections across realities don't always have the same names? I think maybe the book just isn't conducive to audio processing (no ability to flip back and forth and compare stories). And then there's a bunch of god stuff? And nanites? Ink doesn't have characters; it has archetypes which you identify by certain traits in each story they show up in, and each story tells you a little more of the story of the war in heaven. If you've never been exposed to comparative mythology stuff like the Golden Bough or Campbell's monomyth it can get kind of inscrutable. I remember Ink being a little easier to follow, but that could be because it focuses on archetypes that are already somewhat established in the first book so you spend less time piecing them together.
|
# ¿ May 31, 2015 06:32 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 01:51 |