|
If you want to see really lovely camera action, set battlecam to Free and try and watch anything.Michaellaneous posted:Don't buy.
|
# ¿ May 24, 2015 09:44 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 22:22 |
|
Michaellaneous posted:Also is it just me or are GC2 and 3 pretty much the same without anything new? There's the civ5 social policy/ideology trees + civ5 style strat resources now too!
|
# ¿ May 26, 2015 10:00 |
|
Rougey posted:Resources are used for a couple of different structures and also for specialist ship mods - usually modals that smaller than the non-resource version so you can save them on space. I was being sarcastic, I agree there're not very interesting. Pasting my GC3 review from the Steam thread: quote:It's basically galciv2 again. It looks a bit better, and they've stuck Civ's policy tree and strategic resources onto it, but it still has the same problems as GC 2: You need to constantly spam out constructors to build and upgrade starbases but there is no good automation of the process, there's no practical information about where to setup trade routes, and you need to manually build everything on planets due to tile and adjacency bonuses. On top of that, the AI is a lot worse (get used the MUCH weaker races trying to extort money from you and being mad when you refuse) and the combat camera is super wonky. The game is also fairly unpolished, there's various missing texts and the UI calls the same systems by different names in different places which leads to confusion.
|
# ¿ May 27, 2015 18:06 |
|
Was Space Empires V any good? Like was it ever fixed or fanpatched? It and IV are both on weekly Steam sales this week and I already have IV.
|
# ¿ Jun 1, 2015 20:50 |
|
There's a DLC adding a "cute" (I think they look like poo poo) evil race of squirrel-like things. Aside from that, not much. I'd try playing again if they made building/upgrading starbases less mind-numbingly boring, but so far nothing.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2015 19:12 |