Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

evilweasel posted:

Basically Switzerland can prosecute him themselves, and if they then botch it the Swiss can't extradite.

It seems unlikely that Swiss prosecutors would be too interested in doing Blatter any favours while the Americans are busy burning FIFA to the ground.

ocrumsprug fucked around with this message at 17:48 on May 28, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Malloreon posted:

I vaguely recall someone saying that the DOJ can label FIFA a criminal organization, which will legally forbid any US company (advertiser) from doing any business with FIFA.

Two questions:
Is this possible?

If yes how likely is this to happen?

It would probably sour the good will they have generated so far. People want to see Blatter and everyone involved with FIFA burnt at the stake, but I doubt they want FIFA's corpse flung from the battlements.

At the end of the day, you want a soccer body that can carry on business, just with less crooks running it.

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

KennyTheFish posted:

Could a labeling be used to replace FIFA? If a deal is done with the major Soccer nations to have a replacement for FIFA ready to announce at the same time? It sounds like not a lot of people are happy with the way things are run at the moment.

It probably could be, though the various soccer federations could just make it happen on their own if they wanted to (they don't since they are living high on the hog of FIFA's corruption.)

However when the dust settles it is likely that the un-incarcerated employees of FIFA will be, like four secretaries and the one executive assistant that everyone was hoping would be the scapegoat, should the cops ever catch on. It will be like a fresh start except FIFA already has office leases.

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Gyges posted:

John mentioned 3 brands that he would partake of, Nike was not one.

The sponsors didn't push him out (presumably.) There were conditions for drinking that Budweiser that were not met, so stop drinking it. :barf:

Loretta Lynch is who deserves the handy.

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
I have a hard time imagining anyone in Justice hates their career enough to go after the NFL.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ocrumsprug
Sep 23, 2010

by LITERALLY AN ADMIN

Powercrazy posted:

Who are they going to piss off going after the NFL? They aren't goign to be cancelling games, they are going to be arresting team owners, who people generally hate anyway.

Private money isn't building those stadiums.

  • Locked thread