Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Guavanaut
Nov 27, 2009

Looking At Them Tittys
1969 - 1998



Toilet Rascal

gradenko_2000 posted:

I don't think the South would have agreed to that though? It would have been the same as the North's position of only freedmen being counted for representation/taxation.
They would have still been able to keep people as property, they just have to let them vote in elections. :v:

The other way of doing it would be if they really want to be able to keep people as livestock that badly, then all other livestock gets counted.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

sean10mm
Jun 29, 2005

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD-2R World

mugrim posted:

Putting in a system that gives greater representation to areas that own slaves is effectively not only condoning slavery, but empowering it. Slavery was inherently constitutional as a result. I think the Confederate flag is inherently racists, but don't pretend the Constitution is a shining beacon of liberty when it expressly empowered CDs that had slaves.

True enough, but fudging a compromise on slavery to get the South to sigh on to the constitution isn't the same thing as literally saying in writing that your #1 motivation for the whole thing is the preservation and expansion of slavery. Which is literally what the secessionists did.

Plus you've got to give a black comedy LOL to the "States Rights" crowd when the Confederate constitution explicitly TOOK AWAY the right of states to restrict slavery anywhere, ever, no matter what.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

There's no way the South would have agreed to that. It would have given states an incentive to expand the franchise to get more power, which of course the wealthy landowner class of the South would have decried as a dangerous plot to destroy the government in favor of mob rule and anarchy.

Personally, I think we should amend the constitution to make representation contingent on the number of residents in a state who voted in the last two national elections, give the states a reason to improve access to the voting booth for a change instead of letting them benefit by suppressing the vote.

mugrim
Mar 2, 2007

The same eye cannot both look up to heaven and down to earth.

gradenko_2000 posted:

The slave-holding states wanted their slaves to be counted as whole persons, so that they would have more control of the government via more seats and more electoral votes.

The free states wanted slaves to not be counted at all.

In the end, they decided to compromise.

By compromising they made it constitutional and empowered slave holding districts. They not only expressly approved but also built it into the bones of the country, there is no way around that truth.

Clearly the confederacy is worse, but the founders had little issue with legalized slavery.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

mugrim posted:

By compromising they made it constitutional and empowered slave holding districts. They not only expressly approved but also built it into the bones of the country, there is no way around that truth.

Clearly the confederacy is worse, but the founders had little issue with legalized slavery.

Jefferson predicted the Country would split over Slavery. They were all kinda hypocritical in their proclamations but a lot of then understood that, based on the way they had written the Constitution and had set out certain ideas of liberty, eventually the idea that it must apply to everyone to be valid would take root with people and cause a schism with those who rejected the idea.

It's not so black and white that we can say they all hated slavery, certainly not, but it is more nuanced than you give it credit for.

Jerry Manderbilt
May 31, 2012

No matter how much paperwork I process, it never goes away. It only increases.

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

Jefferson predicted the Country would split over Slavery. They were all kinda hypocritical in their proclamations but a lot of then understood that, based on the way they had written the Constitution and had set out certain ideas of liberty, eventually the idea that it must apply to everyone to be valid would take root with people and cause a schism with those who rejected the idea.

It's not so black and white that we can say they all hated slavery, certainly not, but it is more nuanced than you give it credit for.

I think he was shaking on his deathbed over the Missouri Compromise, and saw that what many Northerners viewed as a sacred contract could not hold as the country expanded westward. He also regretted putting forth a prototype to nullification, if I recall correctly.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

There are obviously valid criticisms of the symbolism of the American flag, and concerns about whether centuries of slavery and genocide have made it an irrevocably tainted and exclusionary symbol of white supremacy.

But the concern-trolling by confederates is worthless: no matter how irredeemable the Union flag may be, the answer will never be "so let's just go ahead and fly the flag of explicit white supremacy and slavery". The principles of the Declaration of Independence are at least nominally universal and can be applied to preserve the dignity and liberty and equality of all persons even if we haven't ever actually done that. The Confederates openly rejected those principles, said any conception of equality between humans is a mistake, and pledged themselves to white supremacy. That's pretty loving bad.

Sure, if you want, let's do a South Africa and make a new US flag and scrub all symbolism of European dominance from all official symbols, I am on board with that. But confederates who started a war that killed half a million Americans over the right to own people like property can shut the hell up about "oh well Maryland had slaves too, take that Lincoln" and "well the North is just as bad otherwise they would have invaded us earlier and stamped out our hideous and inhuman society, makes u think doesn't it"

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

When u think about it all work is a form of slavery, so a government flying the klanflag is no big deal and you are incorrect to be mad about it. Also there are starving children in Africa, did you know

gradenko_2000
Oct 5, 2010

HELL SERPENT
Lipstick Apathy

mugrim posted:

By compromising they made it constitutional and empowered slave holding districts. They not only expressly approved but also built it into the bones of the country, there is no way around that truth.

Clearly the confederacy is worse, but the founders had little issue with legalized slavery.

I don't disagree that slavery was also enshrined into the US Constitution, but FWIW the argument when made by those who would defend the CSA flag is some kind of gotcha: if we can't have our flag, then you shouldn't either!

Personally, I don't really consider that as a "threat". Yeah, there's a whole bunch of unsavory poo poo that the US flag is associated with, and if all the weight of it overshadows all the good that the country has done to the point where it needs to be replaced, then yeah, let's go do that, but those that would defend the Confederacy are not so much interested in having a frank discussion of the legacy of the United States as a whole than they are in taking their ball and going home.

sugar free jazz
Mar 5, 2008

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

When u think about it all work is a form of slavery, so a government flying the klanflag is no big deal and you are incorrect to be mad about it. Also there are starving children in Africa, did you know



oldswitcheroo
Apr 27, 2008

The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers, and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes.
The US flag is the flag of a major modern extant industrialized nation with many flaws and historical achievements, whereas the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia/ Confederate Naval Jack is the banner of a slaver's revolt. These two things are only similar in that they are lengths of cloth that contain the colors red, white, and blue.

mugrim
Mar 2, 2007

The same eye cannot both look up to heaven and down to earth.

oldswitcheroo posted:

The US flag is the flag of a major modern extant industrialized nation with many flaws and historical achievements, whereas the battle flag of the Army of Northern Virginia/ Confederate Naval Jack is the banner of a slaver's revolt. These two things are only similar in that they are lengths of cloth that contain the colors red, white, and blue.

While I agree with what you say, the deification of the founders is a more widespread and pronounced issue than the deification of the confederacy.

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

mugrim posted:

While I agree with what you say, the deification of the founders is a more widespread and pronounced issue than the deification of the confederacy.

It's dumb as hell but it isn't particularly harmful or worth doing anything about, since the end effect is just people cherry-picking vague quotes to make Franklin and Washington agree with whatever dumb modern opinions they have and the founders stand for really nothing in the public psyche beyond FREEDOM. Folks tend to elide the whole 3/5 compromise slaveholdy bits of Revolutionary history completely unless they're explicitly trying to discredit the founders, not use them to claim that's a core national value

Nobody's lynching English symps or tipping shipping crates full of tea into the harbor in 2015. People are still attacking black people and campaigning for the dissolution of the republic for the Confederacy.

sean10mm
Jun 29, 2005

It's a Mad, Mad, Mad, MAD-2R World

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

It's dumb as hell but it isn't particularly harmful or worth doing anything about, since the end effect is just people cherry-picking vague quotes to make Franklin and Washington agree with whatever dumb modern opinions they have and the founders stand for really nothing in the public psyche beyond FREEDOM. Folks tend to elide the whole 3/5 compromise slaveholdy bits of Revolutionary history completely unless they're explicitly trying to discredit the founders, not use them to claim that's a core national value

Nobody's lynching English symps or tipping shipping crates full of tea into the harbor in 2015. People are still attacking black people and campaigning for the dissolution of the republic for the Confederacy.

Exactly. The false equivalency being drawn between the two is frankly dumb as gently caress.

Smoothrich
Nov 8, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 2 years!

sean10mm posted:

Exactly. The false equivalency being drawn between the two is frankly dumb as gently caress.

The only moral flag is my flag?

Pohl
Jan 28, 2005




In the future, please post shit with the sole purpose of antagonizing the person running this site. Thank you.

Smoothrich posted:

The only moral flag is my flag?

It's almost like context matters. :monocle:

Smoothrich
Nov 8, 2009
Probation
Can't post for 2 years!

Pohl posted:

It's almost like context matters. :monocle:



Wrong flag guys..

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

VitalSigns posted:

There are obviously valid criticisms of the symbolism of the American flag, and concerns about whether centuries of slavery and genocide have made it an irrevocably tainted and exclusionary symbol of white supremacy.

But the concern-trolling by confederates is worthless: no matter how irredeemable the Union flag may be, the answer will never be "so let's just go ahead and fly the flag of explicit white supremacy and slavery". The principles of the Declaration of Independence are at least nominally universal and can be applied to preserve the dignity and liberty and equality of all persons even if we haven't ever actually done that. The Confederates openly rejected those principles, said any conception of equality between humans is a mistake, and pledged themselves to white supremacy. That's pretty loving bad.

Sure, if you want, let's do a South Africa and make a new US flag and scrub all symbolism of European dominance from all official symbols, I am on board with that. But confederates who started a war that killed half a million Americans over the right to own people like property can shut the hell up about "oh well Maryland had slaves too, take that Lincoln" and "well the North is just as bad otherwise they would have invaded us earlier and stamped out our hideous and inhuman society, makes u think doesn't it"

This flag defeated the evil of slavery, and should always be flown. It is the flag of freedom; it is the flag of responsibility in an irresponsible and populist world.

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

My Imaginary GF posted:

This flag defeated the evil of slavery, and should always be flown. It is the flag of freedom; it is the flag of responsibility in an irresponsible and populist world.

:allears: you're becoming my favorite DaD poster

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

Ron Paul Atreides posted:

:allears: you're becoming my favorite DaD poster

It is the flag that brought the Jubilee. If this flag ain't yours, neither is the Jubilee.

mugrim
Mar 2, 2007

The same eye cannot both look up to heaven and down to earth.

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

It's dumb as hell but it isn't particularly harmful or worth doing anything about, since the end effect is just people cherry-picking vague quotes to make Franklin and Washington agree with whatever dumb modern opinions they have and the founders stand for really nothing in the public psyche beyond FREEDOM. Folks tend to elide the whole 3/5 compromise slaveholdy bits of Revolutionary history completely unless they're explicitly trying to discredit the founders, not use them to claim that's a core national value

Nobody's lynching English symps or tipping shipping crates full of tea into the harbor in 2015. People are still attacking black people and campaigning for the dissolution of the republic for the Confederacy.

Just to be clear, you are claiming confederate nationalism is more responsible for deaths in 2015 than American nationalism? I feel like I'm misunderstanding you.

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

"American nationalism" isn't the founders cult broseph

There is, of course, nothing of Confederate nationalism that is not hagiography for its glorious history and founding ideals of racial inequity, because the Confederacy hasn't loving existed since 1865

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

like I feel like for everyone else this is a thread about marginalizing a hate group that's subsisted for generations on its iconography and mythos going unchallenged outside liberal enclaves, and you really want it to be about Bree Newsome stepping on your balls and calling you a naughty American imperialist instead. Nobody's going to stop trying to bomb the Middle East into becoming the Rotary Club of Cleveland because there's not a picture of George Washington on the quarter anymore, those guys actually tend to find the Constitution worship poo poo an annoying impediment to be worked around, but kids might not shoot up a black church if everyone around them isn't telling them it was when the darkies got rights that everything really started going to hell

A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 04:03 on Jul 8, 2015

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

like I feel like for everyone else this is a thread about marginalizing a hate group that's subsisted for generations on its iconography and mythos going unchallenged outside liberal enclaves, and you really want it to be about Bree Newsome stepping on your balls and calling you a naughty American imperialist instead. Nobody's going to stop trying to bomb the Middle East into becoming the Rotary Club of Cleveland because there's not a picture of George Washington on the quarter anymore, those guys actually tend to find the Constitution worship poo poo an annoying impediment to be worked around, but kids might not shoot up a black church if everyone around them isn't telling them it was when the darkies got rights that everything really started going to hell

Why the gently caress do you want to remove George W from the quarter?

Everything went to hell when we lost our way and the big city machines died.

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

because he's taking up space that in a just world would belong to Bootsy Collins, but that's a separate issue

Main Paineframe
Oct 27, 2010

My Imaginary GF posted:

This flag defeated the evil of slavery, and should always be flown. It is the flag of freedom; it is the flag of responsibility in an irresponsible and populist world.

But nobody's talking about the British flag, the greatest symbol of civilization ever to exist???

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

because he's taking up space that in a just world would belong to Bootsy Collins, but that's a separate issue

Bootsy Collins ain't dead yet man.

oldswitcheroo
Apr 27, 2008

The bombers opened their bomb bay doors, exerted a miraculous magnetism which shrunk the fires, gathered them into cylindrical steel containers, and lifted the containers into the bellies of the planes.

mugrim posted:

While I agree with what you say, the deification of the founders is a more widespread and pronounced issue than the deification of the confederacy.

...It's about half and half where I come from.

http://www.sunherald.com/2015/07/06/6309928/jeppie-barbour-we-wont-be-bossed.html


edit; have some fun quotes!

Some Baptist Preacher from the Sticks posted:


I would like to reach out to black people because they do not understand history, Many of them still believe the North is the one that freed the slaves.


League of the South Georgia Co Chair William Flowers posted:


I will do everything I can to promote secession today,


Former Governor Haley Barbour's brother Jeppie, Mayor of Yazoo City, MS 1968-72 posted:


They were fighting for the freedom of the South not to get bossed around by a bunch of Yankees


oldswitcheroo fucked around with this message at 16:19 on Jul 8, 2015

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Nintendo Kid posted:

Bootsy Collins ain't dead yet man.

Neither was Salmon P Chase when he got to be on a whole mess of US currency.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

VitalSigns posted:

Neither was Salmon P Chase when he got to be on a whole mess of US currency.

Which is precisely why it's illegal to be on money while you're alive, dingus.

TheImmigrant
Jan 18, 2011
Sunlight is the best disinfectant. I'm happy that individuals are free to display the Stars and Bars, because it tells me instantly that they are shitheads with whom I have no desire to associate, other than to abuse them. That flag has absolutely no business being displayed in conjunction with any level of government though.

VitalSigns
Sep 3, 2011

Nintendo Kid posted:

Which is precisely why it's illegal to be on money while you're alive, dingus.

Is it really? That's hilarious.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe

VitalSigns posted:

Is it really? That's hilarious.

Yes, his self-promotion led to his image being stricken from paper money and it being illegal to put anyone living on. He was doing it, essentially, as part of a plan to build name recognition for becoming president in the future.

Funnily enough, long after he died his portrait was put on $10,000 bills that were issued for exchanging large sums of money between banks.

mugrim
Mar 2, 2007

The same eye cannot both look up to heaven and down to earth.

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

like I feel like for everyone else this is a thread about marginalizing a hate group that's subsisted for generations on its iconography and mythos going unchallenged outside liberal enclaves, and you really want it to be about Bree Newsome stepping on your balls and calling you a naughty American imperialist instead. Nobody's going to stop trying to bomb the Middle East into becoming the Rotary Club of Cleveland because there's not a picture of George Washington on the quarter anymore, those guys actually tend to find the Constitution worship poo poo an annoying impediment to be worked around, but kids might not shoot up a black church if everyone around them isn't telling them it was when the darkies got rights that everything really started going to hell

Fair enough, I muddied the waters by talking about the founders specifically. I should have been more general and addressed nationalism.

My Imaginary GF
Jul 17, 2005

by R. Guyovich
I think I've come up with a compromise

How about South Carolina gets to fly their stars and bars, while the USPTO grants the NAACP a trademark over the logo?

Then the purchase of confederate regalia will go to benefit civil rights for african americans. Who would oppose this?

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

mugrim posted:

Fair enough, I muddied the waters by talking about the founders specifically. I should have been more general and addressed nationalism.

Take away the Confederate flag and Lost Cause rhetoric, and nothing remains of the Confederacy but some dates in a history book and some sad dudes who feel that in the absence of anything else at all special about them they should get VIP treatment for successfully being born with pink skin. Take away the American flag and the Clash of Civilizations and the democratic peace and George Washington chopping down the cherry tree and every other ideological myth about America, and America remains.

The point of targeting Confederate iconography isn't that it's bad, or that this is easier than rounding up all the wicked racists and putting them in camps and we're all lazy; it's that propaganda is the best and only tool the white nationalists got to exert their power and perpetuate their existence and in the US the Confederacy is pretty much the one standard they can peddle openly. The United States, on the other hand, has quite a lot of bombs and guns and a standing government and a vast economy and virtually uncontested dominion over the whole of the Earth, and some strong material motivations to behave as it does that most Americans innately recognize no matter how many Chinese-made Che shirts they own. Reagan and Clinton and Bush and Obama all had very different perspectives on what America means, and when push came to shove their regimes behaved pretty similarly re: all the important killing-people bits.

Social opprobrium is kind of a dumb and ineffectual slacktivist tool to levy against an actual empire, as I recall that was pretty notably tried during the Iraq war and America just kinda shrugged and kept on doin' what it wanted to do because the moral support of the world amounted to a few hundred tribute soldiers from its most significant allies. Start shutting down airbases or blockading trade and you're cooking with gas, but funny enough nobody even wants to talk too loud about that :v:

A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 08:04 on Jul 9, 2015

Ron Paul Atreides
Apr 19, 2012

Uyghurs situation in Xinjiang? Just a police action, do not fret. Not ongoing genocide like in EVIL Canada.

I am definitely not a tankie.

My Imaginary GF posted:

I think I've come up with a compromise

How about South Carolina gets to fly their stars and bars, while the USPTO grants the NAACP a trademark over the logo?

Then the purchase of confederate regalia will go to benefit civil rights for african americans. Who would oppose this?

:vince:

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


Here's a really good article about the flag and the South by Patterson Hood:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/09/magazine/the-souths-heritage-is-so-much-more-than-a-flag.html

quote:

First off, I love the Southland.

I was born and raised in Florence, Ala., a small town on the northern banks of the Tennessee River in a region known locally as the Shoals. It’s a Bible Belt community; my hometown was “dry” until I was nearly 20 years old. It was also the birthplace of some of the most beloved and important music of the 20th century.

W.C. Handy, sometimes known as the father of the blues and an important early jazz figure — the author of “Beale Street Blues” and “St. Louis Blues,” among other early standards — was born in Florence in 1873. The radical and ingenious producer Sam Phillips was born half a century later in McGee Town, a small farming community about eight miles to the northwest, two farms over from my family’s homestead. He nurtured the invention of rock ’n’ roll, discovering Elvis Presley, Johnny Cash, Howlin’ Wolf, Charlie Rich, Ike Turner, Carl Perkins and Jerry Lee Lewis, among many others.

On the south side of the river, the neighboring towns of Muscle Shoals and Sheffield hosted recording studios — FAME Studios and Muscle Shoals Sound Studios, respectively — that along with Stax Records’ studio in Memphis became the epicenter of the soul and R&B explosion of the late ’60s and early ’70s. Aretha Franklin, Wilson Pickett, Percy Sledge, the Staple Singers, Bobby Womack and many other African-American artists crossed racial barriers and recorded classic music with the Muscle Shoals Rhythm Section, who happened to be white. Together, they recorded landmark hits that were the soundtrack of the Civil Rights Movement.

The four towns that make up the Shoals are deeply religious and politically conservative, but they also hosted a bubbling underground of progressive thought, home to a vibrant minority of freethinkers and idealists. In our own mythology, we weren’t caught up in the bloody violence that will forever haunt the reputations of Birmingham, Memphis and Selma — we were too busy making joyous music. The elementary school I attended had already been integrated (peacefully, as far as I know) by 1970, when I started first grade. I never saw a burning cross or a burning church. That said, I’m sure there has been plenty of frothing at the mouth there recently over last month’s Supreme Court decisions, President Obama’s eulogy for Clementa Pinckney at Charleston’s Emanuel A.M.E. Church, the rainbow lights at the White House — and of course, the Confederate flag.

When I was growing up, I never thought much about the flag. My father, David Hood, was and still is a session bass player with the Muscle Shoals Rhythm Section. His views on the Civil Rights era were shaped by the time he spent playing with Aretha and the Staple Singers. He looked at George Wallace and Bull Connor with great disdain, and was mortified to think that people around the world believed all Southerners were like that.

My father worked long hours at the studio, and I spent a large part of my childhood with my grandparents and great-uncle. Raised during the Great Depression, they were progressive by the standards of their generation and told me stories about Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who the old folks said had saved Florence and the surrounding towns; and Wilson Dam, a World War I-era structure that crossed the Tennessee River just east of Florence, made the river navigable and provided the impetus for Roosevelt’s Tennessee Valley Authority, which electrified the region and brought it — sometimes kicking and screaming — into the 20th century. They also told stories about my great-great-grandfather, who fought for the Confederacy at Shiloh during the Civil War. They were always quick to say that he had been poor and never owned slaves, and had simply fought against a conquering army invading his home.

Such is the storytelling that pervades the Southern character. The South loves myths and legends, and while they may have roots in the truth, they often overlook certain complexities. We raise our children steeped in “Gone With the Wind” folklore and pretend that all the things we saw in “12 Years a Slave” didn’t happen.

As a songwriter, I’ve spent the better part of my career trying to capture both the Southern storytelling tradition and the details the tall tales left out, putting this dialectical narrative into the context of rock songs. My band’s best-known work, an album we recorded a decade and a half ago called “Southern Rock Opera,” is an examination of life in the South after the Civil Rights era, in the form of a coming-of-age tale of a Southern boy about my age who grows up to become a famous musician before dying in a plane crash while on tour. The album wrestled with how to be proud of where we came from while acknowledging and condemning the worst parts of our region’s history.

When Drive-By Truckers were recording “Southern Rock Opera,” we were very concerned about how the record would be received. We wanted to back up everything we said with documented facts, lest we be construed as apologists — lest someone not notice that a sympathetic song about George Wallace was written from the Devil’s point of view. And we made a conscious decision not to discuss the so-called rebel flag. We didn’t want our narrative getting bogged down in a debate about an antiquated symbol, one we considered a moot point in any case. My own coming-of-age story revolved around much more important things like going to rock concerts and trying to get a date or hanging out with friends on weekends. The flag might have been a backdrop at Lynyrd Skynyrd concerts, but beyond that it wasn’t really anything any of us thought much about at the time.

It was only later, when we started playing songs from the album at shows, that we noticed that fans were bringing rebel flags and waving them during a song called “The Southern Thing.” The song was written to express the contradictions of Southern identity:

Ain’t about no foolish pride, ain’t about no flag
Hate’s the only thing that my truck would want to drag
You think I’m dumb, maybe not too bright
You wonder how I sleep at night
Proud of the glory, stare down the shame
Duality of the Southern Thing.

Instead, people were treating it as a rallying cry. I’m still grappling with how easily it was misinterpreted — and we rarely play it today for that reason.

It was around that time that I began paying attention to the flag flying at courthouses and state capitals. I started hearing things like “heritage, not hate” from people who were perhaps well-meaning, but were nevertheless ignoring the fact that their beloved Southern Cross flew at Klan rallies — that it was a symbol for a war fought on the principle of one man owning another. Let’s pause to think about that one for a moment: one man owning another. When our kindly Grandpa says “states’ rights,” that’s the “right” he’s talking about. Unfair tariffs? Many of the soldiers in the Civil War probably couldn’t spell “tariff.” But they certainly knew that the South’s economy and very way of life was built upon the backs of men, women and children of color.

Last month, a terrorist with a gun killed nine unarmed men and women in a church in Charleston and woke the people in our country up from sweet dreams of a postracial America, driving home just how far we still have to go. As the city mourned and tried to make sense of its grief, the State House of South Carolina still flew the rebel flag at full staff. Now the tide is turning; the state’s legislature voted to take it down from the Capitol grounds early Thursday morning, and it’s not impossible to think that other Southern states might do the same before long.

It’s high time that a symbol so divisive be removed. The flags coming down symbolize the extent to which those who cry “heritage, not hate” have already lost their argument. Why would we want to fly a symbol that has been used by the K.K.K. and terrorists like Dylann Roof? Why would a people steeped in the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Bible want to rally around a flag that so many associate with hatred and violence? Why fly a flag that stands for the very things we as Southerners have worked so hard to move beyond?

If we want to truly honor our Southern forefathers, we should do it by moving on from the symbols and prejudices of their time and building on the diversity, the art and the literary traditions we’ve inherited from them. It’s time to study and learn about who we are and where we came from while finding a way forward without the baggage of our ancestors’ fears and superstitions. It’s time to quit rallying around a flag that divides. And it is time for the South to — dare I say it? — rise up and show our nation what a beautiful place our region is, and what more it could become.

A Wizard of Goatse
Dec 14, 2014

Sheng-ji Yang posted:

Here's a really good article about the flag and the South by Patterson Hood:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/09/magazine/the-souths-heritage-is-so-much-more-than-a-flag.html

DBT are A-OK, although I still think that song that's just an extended lecture on how George Wallace wasn't a racist just an amoral political opportunist while the rest of the band kinda poke at their instruments in the background is fucken wierd

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Sheng-Ji Yang
Mar 5, 2014


A Wizard of Goatse posted:

DBT are A-OK, although I still think that song that's just an extended lecture on how George Wallace wasn't a racist just an amoral political opportunist while the rest of the band kinda poke at their instruments in the background is fucken wierd

Southern Rock Opera is my least favorite of their albums, yeah. Their first two albums are the best (despite having the worst album covers of all time), followed by Decoration Day and the Dirty South.

  • Locked thread