Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
InsanityIsCrazy
Jan 25, 2003

by Lowtax

Rainbow Unicorn posted:

This is true but also a little misleading and dismissive because in some industries it is increasingly a requirement to put yourself way, way out there on social media, enough so that if an online community decided to suddenly make you a target of harassment you'd be totally screwed with very little recourse. Obviously at the end of the day people who put themselves on social media are choosing to do so, but sometimes it is a very real decision between "welp, do I find a different job/career or do I risk the possibility that somewhere someday a bunch of ill adjusted sociopaths will post my address and phone number to an online message board and harass me for a year+ straight"

It's kinda hosed up.

I've been in Computer Science and the surrounding culture for almost 15 years and I have yet to find an effective counter to troll culture. They evolve just as fast as the medium. Short of removing anonymity entirely, or drastically increasing the powers of net surveillance, it's basically whackamole.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Black Baby Goku
Apr 2, 2011

by Nyc_Tattoo

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

Ehhh idk man I like feminism but it does seem to have become a hobby for the privileged. I get the impression Anita is probably more recognizable than Sandra Fluke. That's a little sad.

Modern identity politics based feminism is inherently a privileged hobby

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

Ehhh idk man I like feminism but it does seem to have become a hobby for the privileged. I get the impression Anita is probably more recognizable than Sandra Fluke. That's a little sad.

Well she works harder than Sandra Fluke.

420 Gank Mid
Dec 26, 2008

WARNING: This poster is a huge bitch!

SedanChair posted:

Well she works harder than Sandra Fluke.

Take it easy Rush Limbaugh, we're not out to steal your medicaid old man.

XMNN
Apr 26, 2008
I am incredibly stupid
RIP Hellthread, you were too beautiful for this world.

Rainbow Unicorn
Aug 4, 2004

InsanityIsCrazy posted:

I've been in Computer Science and the surrounding culture for almost 15 years and I have yet to find an effective counter to troll culture. They evolve just as fast as the medium. Short of removing anonymity entirely, or drastically increasing the powers of net surveillance, it's basically whackamole.

Similar experience here and I 100% agree. This is why I have no real solutions to offer, just a lot of frustrated observation.

Sephiroth_IRA
Mar 31, 2010

SedanChair posted:

Well she works harder than Sandra Fluke.

My impression is it has to do with more people caring about feminism as it relates to their hobbies more than anything else.

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001
Oh that's why it's here. Well have fun everyone!

Fabricated
Apr 9, 2007

Living the Dream

Dreylad posted:

Why are hellthread topics getting thrown into D&D where it'll run for 200 pages then get gassed?
The mere existence of the hellthread made some really retarded people so angry they were incapable of handling it. Also :rip: in advance to any or all of us in case this was some super clever honeypot or whatever.

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

My impression is it has to do with more people caring about feminism as it relates to their hobbies more than anything else.

My impression is that people are more likely to encounter feminism when it intersects with something they already know about, thanks to thirty years or so of propaganda from the radical right and their useful idiots like BBG.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

My impression is it has to do with more people caring about feminism as it relates to their hobbies more than anything else.

Games are about the most important form of media there is nowadays, and the one filled with the most gross sexism.

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Wait are gamerdweebs still On about this?

InsanityIsCrazy
Jan 25, 2003

by Lowtax

SedanChair posted:

Games are about the most important form of media there is nowadays, and the one filled with the most gross sexism.

Since this is a new thread, what forms of sexism stand out most to you?

Disinterested
Jun 29, 2011

You look like you're still raking it in. Still killing 'em?
http://toucharcade.com/2015/06/25/apple-removes-confederate-flag/

Junkfist
Oct 7, 2004

FRIEND?

InsanityIsCrazy posted:

Since this is a new thread, what forms of sexism stand out most to you?

He's upset the majority of female characters have the same skin tone as him.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

InsanityIsCrazy posted:

Since this is a new thread, what forms of sexism stand out most to you?

I agree with everything Anita Sarkeesian has ever said.

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


Archer666 posted:

Also what's D&D's stance on hot twinks cosplaying as anime characters?

I approve

InsanityIsCrazy
Jan 25, 2003

by Lowtax

SedanChair posted:

I agree with everything Anita Sarkeesian has ever said.

Oh. OK.

Ralp
Aug 19, 2004

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Please keep all posts strictly on topic in this thread. The substantial difference between this thread being in D&D and the other one that was in GBS, is that moderators will be looking at it sometimes, and I've asked them not to pull their punches.

Archer666
Dec 27, 2008

Rainbow Unicorn posted:

This is true but also a little misleading and dismissive because in some industries it is increasingly a requirement to put yourself way, way out there on social media, enough so that if an online community decided to suddenly make you a target of harassment you'd be totally screwed with very little recourse. Obviously at the end of the day people who put themselves on social media are choosing to do so, but sometimes it is a very real decision between "welp, do I find a different job/career or do I risk the possibility that somewhere someday a bunch of ill adjusted sociopaths will post my address and phone number to an online message board and harass me for a year+ straight"

It's kinda hosed up.

It's hosed up, but also not really a problem. Set up a idealized facebook/twitter page for the companies and a more personal facebook/twitter for friends. With privacy settings you can easily manage who gets to see what. There's still a risk of getting your picture backtracked to you, I'll admit that. But I wholeheartedly believe that if you're extremely careful, you have nothing to fear when it comes to getting doxxed.

Peel posted:

I wonder if one background factor in this is a collision of cultures between people used to pseudonymous communities held separate from real life (and where anything goes), and newer Internet users who treat social media as you're encouraged to, as an adjunct to your real identity.

I wonder if things like this and employer scrutiny of social media could lead to a retreat from the idea of the Internet as an extension of real personal life, except in closely controlled ways. If you have to have a Facebook account for your job keep it carefully sanitised and do your internet socialising under a pseudonym or in private channels.

As someone from a earlier internet generation, it's always a little strange for me when people do their best to put their names out into the internet as much as they can. Also taking facebook/twitter extremely seriously, if this gamergate mess is to be believed. It's the complete opposite of what I was taught about the internet in the day. The fact that we're actually seriously discussing calling the police to arrest people for trolling someone is, to a part of me, completely surreal.

This mess is basically the old and the new internet generations clashing. The old are making fun of the new, who deal with trolls and shitposting in a fundamentally different level.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Ralp posted:

It's not, in any way shape or form, but some mentally insane people want to keep posting about it, and here is more appropriate than GBS.

Just throwing out an idea here but maybe you could ban them???

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib

Archer666 posted:

It's hosed up, but also not really a problem. Set up a idealized facebook/twitter page for the companies and a more personal facebook/twitter for friends. With privacy settings you can easily manage who gets to see what. There's still a risk of getting your picture backtracked to you, I'll admit that. But I wholeheartedly believe that if you're extremely careful, you have nothing to fear when it comes to getting doxxed.


As someone from a earlier internet generation, it's always a little strange for me when people do their best to put their names out into the internet as much as they can. Also taking facebook/twitter extremely seriously, if this gamergate mess is to be believed. It's the complete opposite of what I was taught about the internet in the day. The fact that we're actually seriously discussing calling the police to arrest people for trolling someone is, to a part of me, completely surreal.

This mess is basically the old and the new internet generations clashing. The old are making fun of the new, who deal with trolls and shitposting in a fundamentally different level.

The basic assumptions about human behavior on display here are astounding, as is the belief that existence should consist of carefully siloed identities from here to eternity.

InsanityIsCrazy
Jan 25, 2003

by Lowtax

Archer666 posted:

As someone from a earlier internet generation, it's always a little strange for me when people do their best to put their names out into the internet as much as they can. Also taking facebook/twitter extremely seriously, if this gamergate mess is to be believed. It's the complete opposite of what I was taught about the internet in the day. The fact that we're actually seriously discussing calling the police to arrest people for trolling someone is, to a part of me, completely surreal.

This mess is basically the old and the new internet generations clashing. The old are making fun of the new, who deal with trolls and shitposting in a fundamentally different level.

Pretty much. Back in the day drama was contained to usenet groups and IRC. Now in this modern era everyone can see whatever mind-numbing thing enters your head in 140 characters or less. I think half the problem is people reflexively use Twitter and either don't think about what they say, or forget that context doesn't exist on social media.

BexGu
Jan 9, 2004

This fucking day....

SedanChair posted:

I agree with everything Anita Sarkeesian has ever said.

That doesn't answer anything. Give specific examples that you have a problem with. Hell take a current game you are playing.

Sephiroth_IRA
Mar 31, 2010

Raskolnikov38 posted:

Just throwing out an idea here but maybe you could ban them???

Wouldn't you rather change their minds if they're as bad as you think?

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib

BexGu posted:

That doesn't answer anything. Give specific examples that you have a problem with. Hell take a current game you are playing.

What is the purpose of this question? To deny that sexism exists in video games, gaming culture, the United States, the world?

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

Wouldn't you rather change their minds if they're as bad as you think?

Actually, I would rather the sort of person who cares about this not exist at all, rather than being reoriented to be a idiocy factory for a better cause. So in lieu of them getting the necessary psychotherapy...

InsanityIsCrazy
Jan 25, 2003

by Lowtax

Effectronica posted:

What is the purpose of this question? To deny that sexism exists in video games, gaming culture, the United States, the world?

To prove gamer cred, obviously.

quote:

Actually, I would rather the sort of person who cares about this not exist at all, rather than being reoriented to be a idiocy factory for a better cause. So in lieu of them getting the necessary psychotherapy...

You're not related to former poster bonvivant, are you?

InsanityIsCrazy fucked around with this message at 15:39 on Jun 26, 2015

Dreylad
Jun 19, 2001

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

Wouldn't you rather change their minds if they're as bad as you think?

They're not bad, they're mentally ill as Ralp said. You can't change a crazy person's mind.

Raskolnikov38
Mar 3, 2007

We were somewhere around Manila when the drugs began to take hold

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

Wouldn't you rather change their minds if they're as bad as you think?

No I wouldn't put hellposters into the group titled 'open to new ideas or challenging their own closely held beliefs' at all.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth
RIP Hellthread, had a good run.


Dreylad posted:

They're not bad, they're mentally ill as Ralp said. You can't change a crazy person's mind.

Who?

BexGu
Jan 9, 2004

This fucking day....

InsanityIsCrazy posted:

To prove gamer cred, obviously.

Nah, I really want to know. Just saying I agree with everything one popular persons says makes SedanChair come off more as a unthinking robot then a real person. Of course games has a sexist problem, but I'm asking how bad SedanChair thinks it is and in what areas.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

BexGu posted:

That doesn't answer anything. Give specific examples that you have a problem with. Hell take a current game you are playing.

Why, so I can activate your trap card? I don't follow the treasured litany of ingroup gamergater rebuttals to examples of obvious sexism, and I have no interest in invoking them. Decide sexism doesn't exist, but don't expect me to have a conversation with you about it.

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

So the Ethnics In Game Journalism thing is where we're supposed to be mad that some indy developer hosed some critic once, right?

icantfindaname
Jul 1, 2008


gas thread, ban OP, send all gamergaters to reeducation and reform through labor camps

Effectronica
May 31, 2011
Fallen Rib
The most interesting thing about this is that the radical right actually believes some of the things it says. Witness, for example, people using their status as a minority to attempt to destroy all opposition.

PupsOfWar
Dec 6, 2013

Effectronica posted:

The most interesting thing about this is that the radical right actually believes some of the things it says. Witness, for example, people using their status as a minority to attempt to destroy all opposition.

feminofascism

Sephiroth_IRA
Mar 31, 2010
I think I've seen mental illness and a few reasonable people on both sides. Somehow the topic keeps ending up on the news, the radio and referenced in popular media so it's not like people are still talking about one thing that happened a year ago.

The goons who still care about Doobie seem far more mentally ill by comparison.

woke wedding drone
Jun 1, 2003

by exmarx
Fun Shoe

Effectronica posted:

The most interesting thing about this is that the radical right actually believes some of the things it says. Witness, for example, people using their status as a minority to attempt to destroy all opposition.

Well why else would you listen to me? This was my expert ruse to deflect criticism.

Sephiroth_IRA posted:

I think I've seen mental illness and a few reasonable people on both sides. Somehow the topic keeps ending up on the news, the radio and referenced in popular media so it's not like people are still talking about one thing that happened a year ago.

The goons who still care about Doobie seem far more mentally ill by comparison.

How can you be reasonable in defense of sexism, or in opposition to feminism? Wrong side of history man.

ate shit on live tv
Feb 15, 2004

by Azathoth

PupsOfWar posted:

So the Ethnics In Game Journalism thing is where we're supposed to be mad that some indy developer hosed some critic once, right?

Actually no. It's not the relationship between a "developer" and a "journalist," its the non-disclosure. Since being good friends with someone is obviously going to color your review of their product. That's really it, and one of the many good things that has come from gamergate, beyond the hilarity of people melting down about it, is that many sites now have disclosures as part of their review process.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

I said come in!
Jun 22, 2004

PupsOfWar posted:

Wait are gamerdweebs still On about this?

Not really, no. Twitter along with the help of a 3rd party feminist group, like two months ago, conducted research on harassment on Twitter, and they found that even last year hardly any of the harassment was coming from Gamergate.

  • Locked thread