|
Helsing posted:The fascist movements you refer to attempted to cultivate a mass base and seize political power. The ambitions of the NRx movements seems to revolve around utilizing technology to do an end run around any kind of serious political mobilization. It's a fascist version of the singularity, which is perhaps another way of saying that it's fascism for shut ins who would rather photoshop themselves as Magic the gathering cards rather than try to seize state power. It's hilarious that they think the problem with ein Reich, ein Volk, ein Fuhrer is the existence of the volk.
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 10:07 |
|
|
ToxicSlurpee posted:I like how it goes down below ancient Egypt as if we became literal cavemen during the medieval period. As if any sort of technology just vanished during that period. Yeah totally, we forgot how to use iron and wrote in hieroglyphs again, right? Let's just totally ignore that metalworking and masonry got progressively (but slowly) better during those several centuries. As did seafaring. Let's also just assume that people dressed exactly the same for like 800 years and nobody painted anything or made a statue anywhere. History isn't party of STEM and is therefore useless.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
Woolie Wool posted:Unlike Atwater though, they are profoundly stupid so their dog whistles are extremely transparent. It reminds me of the MRA/redpill/gamergate types who like to try and pretend to be"sjws" and say stupid poo poo to discredit their enemies, but are too goddamned dumb to be convincing and are always baffled as to why they were caught out.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2015 18:31
|
|
|
If I believed there was an international unstoppable conspiracy of Jews, I feel like I'd be awfully reluctant to piss them off.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 4, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
GunnerJ posted:So has anyone mentioned this? quote:
so ssssssseeeeerrrrrrrriously what is up with every dude who is socially conservative and believes in Private Property Uber Alles, Uber Alles Private Property thinking they've invented some kind of new idea?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2015 15:45
|
|
|
Like, how can you move in these circles and think you're doing anything original or unique? You say there should be a tiny class of all-powerful property owners who everybody else must obey and bow down to? Goodness, what startling originality of thought!
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2015 15:46
|
|
|
Basically American Cold War propagandists went out of their way to persuade people that "capitalism" just means trade or exchange or choice, and millions of mouthbreathing idiots and smart people without access to or interest in actual economic theory alike swallowed it completely.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2015 16:39
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:According to her own Objectivist philosophy that was the state's fault for being soft and offering her welfare. Of course a rational human being would accept. When Rand says that everybody should live by the standard of "what is best for me?" the "me" refers specifically to her.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 23, 2015 14:05
|
|
|
I have Ricthofen's War! It's fiddly garbage.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2015 18:33
|
|
|
drilldo squirt posted:I'm going out on a limb here but I bet it confirms a lot of things he wants to be true. It's just a WWI dogfighting hexes and counters game.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 27, 2015 21:51
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:Or if you are Zach Snyder. The way he rewrote the flashback scene with the child murderer and the dogs pretty much says everything about Zach Snyder.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2015 06:40
|
|
|
Anticheese posted:Red Baron was a cool game back in the day. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2015 15:47
|
|
|
GottaPayDaTrollToll posted:Well, the libertarians have HHH, I guess these guys figured they needed Mankind to keep up. Aren't those glasses like absurdly trendy right now?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2015 23:27
|
|
|
Zodium posted:are you sure you didn't do it because there was no longer any question regarding the mutual exclusivity of deductive and inductive inference? i'm not sure what you want me to say about the paper since you only brought it up as some kind of defense for why deduction/induction is somehow useful dichotomy for anything. i'm familiar with it but i'm not gonna re-read the whole thing because you made a "ACTUALLY, Websters defines ..." style reference to it I can't tell if this is a c/p from LessWrong or what.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 4, 2016 19:43
|
|
|
Lovecraft is at his best when his villains are some variant on "holy poo poo, the cosmos is huge and bizarre and there's no place for us in it", like Yog-Sothoth ("Time and space are one in Yog-Sothoth" is a lot more impactful when Newtonian physics is still only just being displaced by Einsteinian relativity) or the way that humanity is just a particularly interesting thing to study for the unbelievably ancient Great Race of Yith, who came millions of years ago from another planet and will eventually abandon this one once they're done with it.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 8, 2016 06:57
|
|
|
There was an LF thread whose title or main point or whatever was to the effect of "In D&D race works the way racists say it does" that was pretty great.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 10, 2016 04:04
|
|
|
Cingulate posted:Okay. From this exercise, have we learned anything about "Race Realists"? I don't think he's posted in this thread in awhile.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 14, 2016 16:55
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:Actually, I think you'll find they call themselves autarchists now. The term "autarchist" is more accurate than he realizes. Kudos on actually understanding anarchism, I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2016 18:34
|
|
|
Guavanaut posted:I think Onanist would more accurately describe a lot of Onan pulled out during sex and that's a lot close to a woman than any of these winners are going to come.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2016 19:05
|
|
philosophy.
|
De Sade is hilarious from a certain perspective because he wrote book after book expounding this worldview he had and literally all of it is just him having this incredibly complex jerk off fantasy life. In 2016 he'd be super into Sonic the Hedgehog, you just know it.
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2016 00:02
|
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:How much of his work was done from a jail cell, again? Not enough.
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2016 00:56
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:Excuse me, the Eschaton is very clear that it is not our god. Real shame about Stross discontinuing that series. I wonder if he's aware of Sandifer's book.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2016 06:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 10:07 |
|
|
Doc Hawkins posted:"Neoreaction: a basilisk" is really the first and last word in the field. Seriously. Buy a copy off Phil Sandifer and be willing to skim the bits about William Blake toward the back.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 31, 2016 15:47
|
|