|
TheImmigrant posted:Another thing I have to say is that Islam, as practiced today, motivates far more violence than any other religion, as practiced today. Yes, because a small amount of Muslims constitutes that all Muslims are violent.  gently caress off.
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 17:54
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 06:14 |
|
|
Brannock posted:How does what he said follow to what you're saying he said? He said Islam is the most violent religion in the world right now, when only one region of the world is actively promoting religious violence. His blanket statement is as worthless as saying that Christianity is the most pedophilic religion just because one group of priests molest their altar boys. TheImmigrant posted:It doesn't. S/he is another exotic-headgear fetishist with a creepily patronizing view of Muslims. TheImmigrant posted:You must be part of the Committee to Defend Islam Against Any Scrutiny. And I see you are nothing but an Islamophobe.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
TheImmigrant posted:People like you have diluted that word to meaningless with frivolous usage. Once upon a time, it had a meaning narrower than "person who doesn't share my embarrassing and patronizing solicitude for Muslims." I've lived and worked in a Muslim-majority country, studied Arabic for several years, and read the Qur'an. I suspect you have maybe read some excerpts by Frantz Fanon, wear a Che t-shirt, and consider yourself a freedom fighter for your brave and valiant Internet Posting. Completely loving off. Maybe if you stopped making poo poo assumptions people wouldn't call you out for being such a retard.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 18:46
|
|
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:Nice use of a bigoted slur there, mate. Really helps your case. You're welcome. 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 18:50
|
|
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:Grow up, dickhead. Nice sexist statement you made there buddy. We're all proud of you. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:edit: You understand "retard" is a pejorative that actually hurts people materially and psychologically, right? Yes. TheImmigrant posted:It's very telling that you find sexism in such an innocuous statement by an Internet nemesis, yet fight tooth and nail to run interference for your fetish religion. It's called a joke, but now I'm starting to feel sorry for calling you a retard because it seems like you might actually be retarded.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 19:24
|
|
|
Fundamentalist Judaism is the most violent religion since it's based on the notion that Jews are born Jews and can't convert to become one and all non-Jews must be killed. Look at what happened to the Canaanites.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 19:28
|
|
|
TheImmigrant posted:Incorrect. You really are a lightweight, aren't you? You're sorta right. Not all Jews want to kill non-believers but Israel does have a large sect of citizens who believe it is alright to kill non-believers because they "Pose a threat to Israel". And let's not forget the fact that a large number of the Jewish population lives in separate communities from the rest of the population in a lot of countries. That has nothing to do with violence, but is more of a way to show how fundamentalism works. See the Bible Belt for a Christian comparison.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Except Judaism does allow for conversion. Even Orthodox Judaism. Ultra-Orthodox (Fundamentalist) Judaism still follows the notion that if your mother isn't Jewish than you aren't. And if her mother wasn't Jewish than she isn't Jewish and so on and so on. They aren't as big a problem like ISIS or the Westboro Baptist Church since they are a smaller and more tight-knit group but backwards beliefs exist in all religions. TheImmigrant posted:Then the motive for killing them is the threat they pose, and not the fact of their non-Jewishness. The threat they pose is their non-Jewishness though. These people believe that Israel is a Jewish country and any non-Jew will taint the Jewish population, making them less Jewish.  Of course this is a conversation more suited for the I/P thread.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 8, 2015 19:50
|
|
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:So you're saying the way to deal with it is through the most destructive war in human history. They're the only plans that ever work.  EDIT: For about 50 years at least. 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2015 17:53
|
|
|
Smoothrich posted:Where were these so-called "moderate" Nazis? Fleeing to places like Brazil and America after they got their poo poo kicked in by the Allies.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 19, 2015 21:31
|
|
|
Sinestro posted:People are disagreeing with me, gas it! There's no debate when it comes to preaching genocide. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2015 19:02
|
|
|
Immortan posted:Mexicans aren't bringing terrible ideas and theocracy with them. I get it, it's alright to genocide those who we disagree with.  Why don't you  back to Stormfront.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2015 19:06
|
|
|
Sinestro posted:Where the gently caress did the idea of genocide come from? I don't see Immortan or Sethex calling for the mass death of Muslims, or do you just find it more fun to attack what you "think" they really mean through your magic tumblr decoder goggles? lol, like I read tumblr. We got Immortan spewing poo poo out like Donald Trump does on a nightly basis (albeit on different ethnicites). Better me to curtail any suggestions of genocide before it happens. And I love how when someone suggests not letting the leading country for funding fundamentalist Islam fund mosques in Europe they're shut down with "you're just a western totalitarianist" as a response. This whole thread is full of retards.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2015 19:15
|
|
|
Sethex posted:Where did I call people here totalitarian? Because unless you can quote me I think you've only succeeded in demonstrating that you don't read good. It wasn't you. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2015 21:38
|
|
|
Absurd Alhazred posted:Instead, explicitly in the case of Amara (Bellil belongs to the same organization, Ni Putes Ni Soumis), it seems to have unfortunate conspiratorial reasoning: I like how it's alright to oppress women in the name of democracy. 
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2015 17:10
|
|
|
"Woman should be banned from wearing any clothes as to not interfere with the male gaze." -France
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
Smudgie Buggler posted:Wait, sorry, what? That bolded thing isn't seriously real, is it? If it is, please forgive my ignorance of American invasiveness. That is astonishing and ludicrous beyond belief. Yup, it's real. Thank 9/11 and the paranoid Bush administration for that.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 17:07
|
|
|
GreyjoyBastard posted:I would just like to say, I would totally love to continue reading an Ask Me Why The Khan Translation Sucks / Let's Read The Koran whether it is in this thread or not.  I was really enjoying those posts.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2015 23:33
|
|
|
Would you guys ban earrings because they mutilate your ear lobes? No? The shut the gently caress up about banning burqas and foot binding.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 16:57
|
|
|
Sinestro posted:However, enlightened people know that slippery slope arguments are fallacious. Enlightenment was once used to justify genocide so good choice of words there.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
Sinestro posted:What the gently caress point is this even making? You response was implying enlightened people are smarter and know better than an unenlightened person. I'm saying that an enlightened person is just as despicable as an unenlightened person. Smart does not make you better.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 19:03
|
|
|
Cat Mattress posted:The flavor of Islam propagated by jihadists is incompatible with the West since it is built as a rejection of all perceived Western values. It's not the case for all flavors of Islam, though. This I can agree with. But change can only truly happen from within. Forcing Western values on Islam as a whole from an outside source is going to have a negative effect regardless of how progressive it is. If Islam itself would be able to have some sort of Reformation like Christianity did during the Colonial era where more everyday practitioners (or at least more major figures in the religion) could ask "Why am I doing this?" and "Who is really benefiting from my faith?" maybe we'd see a more liberal Islam.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 19:36
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 06:14 |
|
|
Sinestro posted:No, I was specifically commenting on the stupidity of SedanChair unironically endorsing someone's over the top exaggeration of his already dumb slippery slope argument. My bad.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 20:08
|
|