|
Specifically, the orthodox NetBSD.
|
#
¿
Jul 9, 2015 23:20
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 14, 2024 15:43 |
|
|
RZApublican posted:That they're free as in beer, not freedom. What do you mean? EDIT: If I recall correctly, the BSDs are both! NetBSD and OpenBSD especially, given that the only things not 'libre' are necessary firmware blobs. dlr fucked around with this message at 01:44 on Jul 10, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 01:30
|
|
|
RZApublican posted:GPL license vs BSD license. And how is the BSD license not free as in freedom? Just because it is more permissive than GPL doesn't make it not free. EDIT: This is a good read about the the BSD and GPL licenses, and their different focuses on freedom. dlr fucked around with this message at 01:55 on Jul 10, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 01:45
|
|
|
Nam Taf posted:ZFS and jails are life and using FreeBSD gives me a stratospheric sort of elitism that alludes those Linux simpletons for the most part. Yep. Pretty much, man. I can't help but feel just a tad bit superior.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
lampey posted:How is ZFS on bsd vs linux? FreeBSD's ZFS support is second only to Solaris, IIRC. Linux lags behind a bit, it seems.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 10, 2015 06:21
|
|