Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
StudlyCaps
Oct 4, 2012
US free trade agreements typically allow foreign, private companies to sue governments who make laws which can be seen to harm profits.
How does that reconcile with the article saying that the solution is strong, active local governments?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

StudlyCaps
Oct 4, 2012

asdf32 posted:

Mostly because that Tea-Party esque fear over sovereignty is unjustified based on past experience with trade agreements.

There have been a few examples of countries being successfully sued over public health or environmental laws and a few cases ongoing. It's not directly applicable to the labour laws stuff in the OP but ISDS clauses are a legit thing to be concerned about.
I'm not really sure what the tea party has to do with it though, I'm not from the US.

  • Locked thread