Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
eSports Chaebol
Feb 22, 2005

Yeah, actually, gamers in the house forever,

asdf32 posted:

Signing a treaty means ceding authority over something by definition. Your question was like asking how you can have strong local governments and UN membership at the same time (a thing conservative types actually worry about). The point is that these suits don't come up that often and arn't that strong anyway.

The lawsuit thing is an enforcement mechanism. If a treaty says do XYZ and you don't do XYZ the possibility of getting sued is a consequence. This is completely consistent with how most liberal states operate internally.

Treaties are signed between sovereign entities so it kind of makes sense for sovereign entities to be the only ones to have standing against foreign governments to file suit. I mean governments are already going to act as shills for major domestic industry anyway so taking them out of the picture is pretty extreme and inconsistent with how most liberal states operate. For instance, what if the American government told the lumber industry to gently caress off and stop complaining about Canadian soft lumber subsidies? They would never do this, but if they did, should American private industry get to just sue Canada? No. The only state that operates this way is the City of London and it's not even a state.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread