|
indeed, the mere consumption of alcohol turns a man into a serial assaulter
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2015 03:21 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 07:13 |
|
Frackie Robinson posted:Drinking doesn't make predators, but it sure as hell makes prey. your a massive idiot
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2015 14:14 |
|
dozens of people came together to cover up a serial assaulter's past and bring him into a situation where he could assault or rape more women. let's solve this problem by telling the women they'll get a fine if they drink
|
# ¿ Aug 22, 2015 14:15 |
|
Frackie Robinson posted:Between the chaplain's testimony after talking to both people and the relatively light sentence, it's almost like there could be ambiguities to this case that we don't know anything about. yor a loving idiot jackass......its astounding to me
|
# ¿ Aug 24, 2015 22:26 |
|
"and you say you'd been drinking on the night in question" *rape victim nods* *officer robinson tears up case file while shaking his head sadly*
|
# ¿ Aug 24, 2015 23:14 |
|
Roasted Donut posted:welcome back to obscurity baylor You realize for you to be saying this you have to be residing in obscurity. Surely, you have owned yourself
|
# ¿ May 27, 2016 00:05 |
|
has ken starr never waved in his life or what
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2016 19:31 |
|
TO WAVE IN HUMAN GREETING Prepare rictus Engorge neck folds Raise claw
|
# ¿ Jun 5, 2016 19:33 |
|
gently caress i was just assaulted. ow that hurts physically and emotionally now where'd i put that checklist of poo poo i gotta do in order to satisfy the doubts of football likers
|
# ¿ Jun 8, 2016 02:05 |
|
No source, no evidence, no problem
|
# ¿ Jun 9, 2016 14:32 |
|
you're an idiot
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2016 04:17 |
|
here you go i googled "campus sexual assault process" then clicked on a link using the mouse, the peripheral device attached to almost all computers http://knowyourix.org/why-schools-handle-sexual-violence-reports/
|
# ¿ Jun 11, 2016 04:32 |
|
Baylor is not prepared, no. That doesn't mean they should encourage the dude to transfer, it means they should shape the gently caress up
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2016 20:06 |
|
As I understand the system, victims can either start a school-level investigation, a criminal investigation, or both. The school has the power to suspend or expel a student and uses the standard of civil courts, "a preponderance of evidence." A criminal investigation obviously would have the usual criminal investigation powers of casting doubt and blame on the victim and excusing the crime--er i mean jail time for the perpetrator. This is coming from my reading of the link i posted earlier. I'll see if I can find anything clearer later. I think this system sucks because it places the onus on the victim to do too much of the work, but it could be made easier with good administration. All of that said, encouraging the accused to transfer so the investigation will go away is the slimiest poo poo imaginable
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2016 00:54 |
|
i'm sorry, i don't follow college football all that much. is baylor not moderate rear end at college football
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2016 13:32 |
|
this is basically an update of woody allen's two old ladies in a nursing home joke "i hate these scum bag black players!" "yeah and they keep leaving my team!"
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2016 02:11 |
|
General Dog posted:It's obviously not good, but if you read the actual AP report they're quoting from, Deadspin is slapping a fairly sensationalist headline on it. It reads like the alcohol policy acted as a passive deterrent for reporting, but not as something where a surly admin actively used it as a cudgel. It's sad, but it's not really anything we didn't already know. are you legit retarded
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2016 20:39 |
|
quote:"A number of victims were told that if they made a report of rape, their parents would be informed of the details of where they were and what they were doing," said Chad Dunn, a Houston attorney who represents six women who have sued Baylor under the anonymous identification of Jane Doe.
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2016 20:40 |
|
General Dog posted:I agree, but the Deadspin article strongly implies the former, which is both misleading and does a disservice to the real issue at hand. gently caress you
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2016 20:44 |
|
i miss helldump. look at all of the incredibly stupid poo poo you've posted General Dog posted:Banning alcohol might go a long way. General Dog posted:Drinking doesn't make predators, but it sure as hell makes prey. General Dog posted:I agree with all of that. Their failure to sever all ties with this guy (or at least keep his rear end away from team facilities) the minute the indictment came down is absolutely what deserves the most ridicule here. General Dog posted:Ever noticed how all the top teams have like 15 players arrested every year? If this Baylor thing even registers with anyone as out of step with the sport as a whole, I don't know what they've been watching. General Dog posted:I'm only defending (just downplaying really) the actions of the football team, not of the administration. Yes, the football team should have kicked this guy off when he was indicted, but it was administration's job to kick the guy out of school, and to take care of the victim's intetests. General Dog posted:Between the chaplain's testimony after talking to both people and the relatively light sentence, it's almost like there could be ambiguities to this case that we don't know anything about. General Dog posted:Baylor's not even my team, I just want to assume the best about people. Maybe I'm crazy, but I can't bring myself to believe that administrators, chaplains, and a full jury are all conspiring to try to get a player who doesn't even matter from getting in trouble for rape so they can increase Baylor's win expectancy by 0.15 games or something. Even in a post-Sandusky world, maybe especially in a post-Sandusky world, that seems insane to me. General Dog posted:Mine too. General Dog posted:You know, having read the article I really don't have a good defense any more, I guess I've just got to admit that the amount of enjoyment I get watching the team outweighs the amount that this actually bothers me. I'm going to go ahead and forfeit my right to discuss this matter any further, because I'm unable to look at it objectively. General Dog posted:If he's no longer at the school, and the incident didn't occur at Baylor, then why would the continue the investigation? General Dog posted:I did. Although, if they've found enough that they've deemed it prudent to kick him out I'm not sure where else they need to go from there. They're wrong to kick them out, they're wrong to let them stay, what exactly is the right way to do this? General Dog posted:As difficult as rape accusations are to confirm, as we've seen at Baylor and also everywhere, I don't see anything wrong with the administration saying, "look, it's probably in everyone's best interest if you just leave." If he's committed a crime, it's not going to shield him from the criminal charges. If he's guilty, they've managed to get rid of a predator (for once), and if he's innocent, they're sparing him the life-ruining ramifications of going through an investigation under the microscope of the national press (the findings won't matter, he'll have had his name and "rape allegations" showing up together for months by the time it's over). hey i know you started this thread so it doesn't make sense to tell you to get out, but you need to get the gently caress out right away
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2016 20:56 |
|
General Dog posted:You're right the post history speaks for itself. I probably should have honored my word and stayed out of it, but I stand by all of the posts. good news, i just loving killed you. mission accomplished, you're dead, stop posting
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2016 21:23 |
|
I'd call the AD too as a safeguard against getting fired for not doing it
|
# ¿ Aug 3, 2016 02:13 |
|
Seriously, stop posting
|
# ¿ Aug 4, 2016 02:27 |
|
General Dog posted:Don't root for Texas don't post
|
# ¿ Aug 20, 2016 02:58 |
|
i know it's not much but when i saw that the browns had art briles in to help at practice, i went to their website and submitted the user feedback form and said i wasn't supporting the NFL in any way until he's gone
|
# ¿ Oct 14, 2016 02:30 |
|
swickles posted:Not really. The report was never recorded outside of whatever notes the people hearing it decided to take. I am sure someone somewhere wrote down some statements, but I am sure they were destroyed after giving the report to the Board. This whole thing was designed to make it so that nothing could be subpoenaed or leaked to the press. i don't think a a law firm would just destroy stuff if their bosses tell them to, especially if it documents criminal activity. they're not slaves
|
# ¿ Nov 2, 2016 13:38 |
|
brent gattis has already set his Facebook to private and non-searchable, or deleted it, because thats what pieces of poo poo do
|
# ¿ Nov 7, 2016 14:44 |
|
man the followup to dril is disappointing
|
# ¿ Nov 29, 2016 03:18 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 07:13 |
|
Jiminy Christmas! Shoes! posted:Was that the son that was molested? "the"?
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2017 05:17 |