|
This thread would not have happened if I had had a gun.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2015 17:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 06:40 |
|
|
All that really should be said about guns and gun ownership is this: "Hokey religions and ancient weapons are no match for a good blaster at your side."
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2015 21:15
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Victimless crimes are bad because I say so. What fresh meme is this?
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2015 23:00
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:It is an indisputable fact that if you support a thing I don't like you are a terrible person and also a murderer with a small dick. Nazis must be good people, since other people think they are bad and terrible people for their opinions.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2015 23:52
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:A solid Effectronica post. Hey, as Harry Truman said, if you can't take the heat, get the hell out of Nagasaki.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 27, 2015 23:59
|
|
|
A good argument for outright banning guns would be that a great many people demonstrably have broken brains due to the influence of guns, and the most humane way to get them to shut up about how it's a magazine/clip, not a clip/magazine, is simply to ban them outright. Significantly restricting access strikes a nice balance with people who have a reason to own and use guns.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 00:28
|
|
various cheeses posted:So you're somehow double-dead when shot by a gun vs stabbed or beaten? Give me a break you clown. Instead of specifically targeting the gun violence boogeyman, try enacting measures that target the crime rate overall. See, for example, how this guy, because he has had his psyche permanent warped by the presence of guns, believes in a vast hivemind of criminals, such that stepping up enforcement on securities fraud would lower the homicide rate.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 00:39
|
|
various cheeses posted:So you're somehow double-dead when shot by a gun vs stabbed or beaten? Give me a break you clown. Instead of specifically targeting the gun violence boogeyman, try enacting measures that target the crime rate overall. Is this the final form of broken-windows policing?
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 00:43
|
|
various cheeses posted:Nah more like reducing poverty rates. The sad fact is poor people tend to do more crime, and you tend to do less crime when you're living comfortably. Poverty has little correlation with crime rates generally. What does correlate strongly is lower socioeconomic status, for the overall crime rate.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 00:52
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:Hypothetical: if there were a way to successfully prohibit drugs and alcohol would you do it? Like how far does this possession crimes rabbit hole go. What does this have to do with what he said?
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 00:59
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:Intoxication has never killed anyone. Firearms derangement has also claimed this man, as he gibbers about how coffee ruins millions of lives every year and kills people.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:20
|
|
|
We live in a society where thousands of Americans, every single second of every goddamn day, think that hyperventilating in front of a gun safe about what means of blowing muggers away they're going to carry today is effectively equal to having a beer or drinking a morning coffee. My friends, this country is in dire peril.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:24
|
|
|
Even leaving aside the basic failures of brain they've got going on, gun types are really lovely at parties, as these last few posts prove. "Rolling Rock?" "That's pure poison. All I need is Ol' Betsy, my painstakingly-restored Lee-Enfield Rifle No 5 Mk I "Jungle Carbine", rechambered for 7.62x51 NATO."
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:29
|
|
|
"Thank god," the man said, as his life ebbed away from the effects of circulatory shock, "that being shot by a man who wouldn't shut up about how guns aren't designed for killing is really no worse than getting hit by a car." Then he passed.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:37
|
|
various cheeses posted:Does every inanimate object have some sort of spirit animal in your mind, dictating its one true use? And look, now we've got religious chauvinism at best going on here! Seriously, these guys are total shitpiles.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:45
|
|
various cheeses posted:I think you're arguing from a really weird place. Like the bow and arrow was designed to kill, do we ban that too? I think that it would be hilarious to go fishing with you, and watch you try to fish with a string tied to a baseball bat. "Intent of the designer does NOT matter," you'd say.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:47
|
|
|
It's really somewhat terrifying to seem someone write what amounts to "if you ban guns you need to ban cranes" with a straight face. Sure, it may have tears streaming down it, but the face is deffo straight.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:52
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:This actually works fine FYI. You can also kill someone with a screwdriver.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:52
|
|
Rent-A-Cop posted:Or your car after a half dozen screwdrivers. Stay on topic. I want to hear more about how fishing rods are a scam, a scam I tells ya! Less about the depressing details of your personal life.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:56
|
|
various cheeses posted:Lol this is so ridiculous. Have you ever hosed a watermelon?
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 01:59
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:if gun only for killing, then why target shooting? why 22lr exist?!? Hold on. We need proof that .22, .25, etc. are all nonlethal calibers. I suggest that you provide video/photo evidence of bullets of those calibers bouncing off your undoubtedly titanic frame. So once you've shot yourself repeatedly, we can then move on to animal testing, to establish a decent probability that small-caliber ammunition is incapable of killing anything.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 11:37
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:A 22lr can kill but so can a pointy stick. Have you ever hosed a watermelon? My answer to your dipshit dishonesty depends entirely on the answer to that question. It's critical.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 11:57
|
|
|
The simple fact that the majority of homicides are committed against people known to the perpetrator is something that apparently doesn't apply to gun homicides. Despite their sneering insistence that a thread titled "gun" should focus as much on homicides committed by table lamps, it seems gun homicides are, in fact, unique. Oh ho ho, it's magic, you know. Never believe it's not so.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 13:36
|
|
|
Important to the magical mind of the gun nut is the belief that because a gun uses a round designed for target shooting, or for killing game birds, it is therefore restrained from being used in violence against humans. Even if some liberal SJW sickopath managed to overcome the spells binding the 20-gauge loaded with birdshot, the percentage chance is lower that they will kill someone with it, so there's no problem.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 13:46
|
|
tumblr.txt posted:So you agree with me that some cartridges (and logically the guns built to take those cartridges) were designed to have purposes other than killing people (target shooting, hunting). Thanks. No, I refuse to agree with liars. Please admit your dishonest statements about what other people have said, such as altering "killing" to "killing people" and refusing to distinguish between guns and bullets. Or, you know, go the way of all gun freaks.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 14:01
|
|
SedanChair posted:Achieve policy success? I was thinking "develop a full-blown sexual paraphilia", but that'$ a workable analog¥.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 16:19
|
|
|
It's kind of disturbing how there are thousands of people who believe that the Supreme Court is infallible when issuing ex cathedra proclamations on matters of doctrine. To begin with, that's the pope who has that superpower.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 18:17
|
|
Fat Ogre posted:No see they made gay marriage/abortion/obamacare legal! But it doesn't count when talking about guns/citizens united/Bush being elected because reasons. To continue, it evinces an overriding indifference to physical reality on the part of the speaker. Can someone who says a thing like this be trusted to recognize that people can be killed when they are shot? Signs point to no.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 18:20
|
|
Fat Ogre posted:
It is not okay to point out the sexually dysfunctional nature of gunfuckers, but it is okay to obsess about obesity and envisioning someone committing suicide in shame over their ignorance of guns.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 18:36
|
|
Tell us all about cutting. Do you cut yourself? Do you bleed butter? Hrmm do tell.
Fat Ogre posted:I didn't say it wasn't ok. I said notice how anti-gun retards always talk about gun owner penis size. To finish with the earlier statements about how owning guns can cause you to go insane, notice how this guy's ability to comprehend language is at the level of a small child's. This can be directly traced back to his gun collection.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
Before you can begin to talk about how the presence of a gun exacerbates conflicts and violence, you must demonstrate that you know the difference between single-action and double-action.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 18:43
|
|
Imagine... a gun control bill that manages to satisfy everyone, and then the President confuses a rifle and a carbine in his remarks, and the bill is sucked away into a vortex and the NRA kills a million people in retaliation.various cheeses posted:Do any of you people believe you should defend yourself if attacked or your home is invaded by a criminal? Why would I need a gun, when I have a lethal intruder protection system on my person and in my home, and a high-pressure electrically-ignited flamethrower, just for kicks? Granted, I've gone through twenty children, but I wouldn't be concerned about home invasion if I wasn't a total SOB, right? Effectronica fucked around with this message at 19:29 on Aug 28, 2015 |
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 19:26
|
|
|
It's always cool when gun nuts try to pass themselves off as rednecks and peckerwoods rather than the classic-rock-listening suburbanites they are.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 19:53
|
|
meristem posted:That's cute. Now tell me where I mentioned Kellerman. Gun nuts are in favor of death though, so this is a classical case of something falling on deaf ears.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:10
|
|
Blue Raider posted:good thing statistics are products of unconnected autists published by organizations i dont give a poo poo about Well, when you end up swallowing your 45, at least you'll still be better than the fag nerds with their math, right?
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:13
|
|
raven4267 posted:I don't even know if you are serious or not anymore. Should people who live in high crime areas not be worried about crimes being committed against them or something? Well, unfortunately, math is for women and homosexuals, so I can't demonstrate the rationality of your fear.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:16
|
|
|
I hope that smarmy little turd tsa explains to raven4647 how he's misunderstanding statistics, else he'd be a hypocrite, lower than even a criminal.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:18
|
|
various cheeses posted:So it's safe to not have any kind of plan, because "it can never happen to me". What's your plan for superflu?
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
As someone who has committed crimes in the past, I feel that I need to be armed in the event that a gun nut, convinced my life has no value, tries to kill me.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:24
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 06:40 |
|
various cheeses posted:I threw all my fire extinguishers away because it'll never happen to me. It's just too unlikely to even give it a single thought. Better tell my boss we need at least one gun per person, for the sake of safety. It's just like our fire extinguishers.
|
|
|
#
¿
Aug 28, 2015 20:26
|
|