|
I'd propose adding Mother Jones or Nat Geo (bought by Murdoch, I'm sure we'll hate it soon enough  ) to the OP! I don't know of any evergreen articles on either, so you guys get some from the front page and my inbox!Mother Jones We're Losing Tens of Thousands of Black Teachers. Here's Why That's Bad for Everyone. Bay Area Police Sex Scandal Keeps Getting Weirder Trump Just Said He Wouldn't Spy on Americans. Here Are 4 Times He Vowed to Do So. National Geographic Stingrays Chew? Who Knew? Is the West's Wild Horse Crisis So Bad Only Euthanasia Can Fix It? Unlikely Tip Leads to Discovery of Historic Shipwreck
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 08:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 1, 2024 14:27 |
|
|
I have a subscription to the Nat Geo magazine, I haven't noticed anything awry. The consensus in news seems to be that it was the Nat Geo TV station that was actually keeping the place afloat. I googled up some articles about it, I haven't read any smoking gun that suggests to me that the place has been significantly Fox Newsed up. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2016-05-17/inside-national-geographic-s-hbo-inspired-murdoch-makeover http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/11/9/1447823/-I-now-know-why-Rupert-Murdoch-bought-National-Geographic https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/nov/14/how-fox-ate-national-geographic DailyKos thinks there is a nebulous climate change skeptic plot.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 15, 2016 08:55
|
|