|
Hell yeah. I was interested in this one since it promised a more traditional RtCW/2k9 experience, then heard it's really short and decided I can do without. Looking forward to seeing what I missed.
|
#
¿
Sep 7, 2015 18:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 15:26 |
|
|
Finally the Let's Player a masterpiece like Five Night At Freddy's deserves?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 8, 2015 17:15
|
|
|
Yeah, with a regime like that people are going to start ratting on one another to settle personal scores. Not to mention there's still, y'know, actual criminals.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
DeusExMachinima posted:The Nazis literally had an idiotic line of thought called Aryan Physics! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Physik
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
Neruz posted:Stalin probably killed a lot more people than Hitler ever did as well, Stalin was just better at hiding his crimes from the rest of the world. That being said, yeah, Stalin was easily the biggest mass murderer of the 20th century.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 10:49
|
|
|
JcDent posted:What about Mao? Or were his incidental more than purposeful?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2015 11:16
|
|
|
Mind you, Soviet atrocities weren't limited to Germany... Or WW2.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 18, 2015 16:03
|
|
|
Fellbat posted:Edit: Also, the origin story for Fanta is insane. It's godamn Nazi soda and we still drink it.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2015 20:26
|
|
|
How did he make general with that name Still, that is some pretty amazing sequel fodder.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 1, 2015 17:05
|
|
|
Might be just me being slow but how exactly is a video game character's sexual orientation relevant to anything?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
No, I really don't get it. Call me a backwoods European peasant or something but I figure there's no point in having a minority represented just for the sake of having a minority represented. If her orientation played any role in the story, sure, but it really seems completely random here. Then again, it got me heavily flamed in the Steam thread when I suggested Witcher 3 was perfectly fine without black people...
|
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2015 21:35
|
|
|
That's entirely the point - why should you care what her orientation is? edit: Right, guess I just feel fishy about the whole positive discrimination thing. It's probably a minefield best stayed out of. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 22:10 on Oct 3, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Oct 3, 2015 21:59
|
|
|
I don't see it as default, though: even a mention of a character being straight should have a reason. We got it with Pippa to show that she's flirty when she's being herself as opposed to her disguise and it works to give her more character but in Annette's case it's not evident whether she's talking about a friend or a girlfriend - and it doesn't really change our perspective of her, hence my confusion on why should it be important. I think a good example of how I think this should work is in Fallout: New Vegas with Arcade and Veronica; neither of them is very open about their orientation, they mention it after you know a good part of their stories and just as a little thing, but it puts the rest of what they told you in a different light.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2015 07:49
|
|
|
Fun fact: recognizing that something exists is different from shoving it in your face.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2015 15:13
|
|
|
cargohills posted:Can you really call a gay character being in a game "shoving it in your face"? TomViolence posted:I think when the game let it be ambiguous and pass without comment it showed it was classier than us by a long mile.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2015 18:13
|
|
|
So what, does not having a gay character in your story mean you do not recognize they exist? Because that's a pretty big stretch. As is forcing one interpretation of an ambigous character as the correct one that everyone should follow. I'm really confused about your logic here.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2015 18:52
|
|
|
But why...? e: On second thought, nevermind. Agree to disagree, understand that we misunderstand; this isn't getting anywhere and makes the thread unpleasant for everyone.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 4, 2015 19:01
|
|
|
Not to mention the single white dude in that game is voice by John Motherfucking Cleese. It's probably the most underappreciated Bioware game.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 5, 2015 12:25
|
|
|
JcDent posted:If you want vaguely GoW-ish characters feeling cool, you want Bulletstorm. But good luck finding a decent serious shooter out there.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2015 09:43
|
|
|
JcDent posted:I didn't realize Bulletstorm is a parody. It was just a fun game with a main character that could have been happier (I like happy chars) and the reaver planet from Firefly Now if they meant it seriously, that puts the game in a different light.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2015 09:56
|
|
|
Dapper_Swindler posted:bullestorm also kinda of has a emotional heart, much like wolfenstine does. which is a nice change of pace. I think any shooty game at some point wants to deal with the absurdity of its gameplay if it wants to tell a story you'd be willing to believe. If you don't acknowledge that, you get GoW... Or Watch_Dogs. That doesn't necessarily mean you need comedy, mind you: often it just helps to overplay one aspect of the action. A good example could be Metro 2033 and its survival horror vibes - the insane shooter gameplay best works in a insane world. anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 16:34 on Oct 6, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2015 12:26
|
|
|
The Shadow Warrior remake, a game I'm apparently way too fond of for some reason.
anilEhilated fucked around with this message at 16:32 on Oct 6, 2015 |
|
#
¿
Oct 6, 2015 14:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 15:26 |
|
|
Gotta say this game channels RtCW extremely well. I was having flashbacks to that goddamn church full of those loving silent-SMG-wielding-pinpoint-accurate-way-too-loving-fast SS bitches in that game for the whole section. Not too sure what to make of the game on the whole. It's way shallower and less complex than TNO but at the same time it feels more... Wolfenstein? I'm just sad it doesn't have the goofy-rear end superweapons of RtCW and 2009.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 14, 2015 12:43
|
|