|
Skoll posted:I really didn't like Chiv's combat. War of the Roses was a lot better melee engine, it was like Warband Advanced. You are quite possibly the only other person I've ever seen who thought this. I also preferred War of the Roses combat engine by a wide margin, but everybody else I've talked to seems to take that as blasphemy, as if Chivalry superiority were a universal truth. 
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 20:08
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 13:48 |
|
|
Skoll posted:You sound like you got murdered a lot in WotR and then rage quit. It's actually a compliment, Orv plays many bad games that he hates.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 22:00
|
|
|
My favorite thing in War of the Roses was when that patch hit that made Bleeds really good and most of the tryhards were running a kit focused on bleeding you. So I took the "bad" perk that made you immune to bleeds in exchange for also not being able to bandage yourself, grabbed a big rear end sword and went Conan the Barbarian on their asses. Sure, I'd eventually die from the lack of healing, but the rage was worth it and you could cut through so many people before they finally killed you with a death of a thousand cuts. I never really did have issues facing cavalry in WotR, either. You could pretty much sidestep them and kill their horse if you couldn't get a clean shot at the rider. Or if it was a team composed of a bunch of cavalry, run that crossbow with the level that gives it one loading notch but a full reload if you hit it and bathe in the tears of their fallen.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 14, 2016 23:28
|
|
|
CoffeeBooze posted:Can a game really be dead if it hasnt even released yet? Of course, it's basically an abortion. 
|
|
#
¿
Dec 24, 2016 04:01
|
|