|
Paracelsus posted:Either you don't have to register your decklist at this tournament and can effectively pre-sideboard, or that guy has a really broad toolbox and a lot of search. It's kind of funny that this comes up though because this has become a big thing (at least in Magic Pro Tour Tournaments). Pro players tend to operate in teams, and their teammates who either didn't qualify or finished their matches early go around and takes notes of the cards in other players decklists and generally submit it to a google doc for their team. Because of this, at least at the PT level, it's generally assumed that people know your decklist by round 2.
|
# ¿ Sep 18, 2015 04:22 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 10:25 |
|
Xelkelvos posted:Zoglin should put these on a site like batoto where everyone can see them and enjoy Zoglin's wonderful work, rather than just hoarding it to ourselves.
|
# ¿ Sep 21, 2015 03:35 |
|
Man she is playing the permissionest permission to ever permission.Gyra_Solune posted:i like the core of the story that is following a nice person having to be a relentless jerk because of circumstances. she hates it, everyone hates it, except her boyfriend who is now fantasizing about her brutally stepping on his face, but she has to do it because her dad is thousands of dollars in debt Basically (if my memory is serving me right of this very short comic), notice the difference in perspective that the peanut gallery has to her playing and her actual opponents.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2015 20:31 |
|
Lemon Curdistan posted:No, she's playing assholish decks that are designed to win by making GBS threads all over her opponent's ability to do anything (which is not in any way fun to be on the receiving end of), and on top of that she's just stone-faced and looks miserable throughout the entire game. I'm honestly not gonna dignify this any further, this is just a hilarious mentality. I play both Netrunner and MtG, it's not a problem that's a difference between mindsets of both communities, it's bad players applying moral ethics to legitimate play styles because they're bad.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2015 22:07 |
|
Like if we want to get into discussions about lovely, scummy behavior that exists in card games (that I will admit that I see a lot more of in MtG than in Netrunner) we can talk about misleading the other player like the infamous, "I use Profane Command to give fear to all my legal targets" implying that the player gave Chameleon Colossus fear so that the other player would misplay. THAT'S scummy and is manipulating information around the actual gameplay in order to obfuscate the game state and create a bad feeling (also technically within the rules of the game, because I guess WotC doesn't want to go down the road of enforcing moral behavior, or even trying to set that standard of morality around it). Choosing to play a permission deck, playing it well, and being somewhat stone-faced about it is nothing like that.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2015 22:14 |
|
Yasser Arafatwa posted:Yeah I don't think her deck itself is scummy or her attitude or w/e in our world where it's literally just a childrens game but it makes more sense in the context of the established world Player psychology can be really weird sometimes.
|
# ¿ Oct 20, 2015 22:52 |
|
Pavlov posted:People like MTG style games because it lets them use a bunch of cool monsters and spells. Permission/Control is the strategy of not not letting people use their monsters and spells. It's not too hard to see why a lot of people don't like it. I don't care too much for MTG, but when I played, I tried to play like protagonist girl, because if I'm not going to have fun, no one is. It's a difference in mentality that ends up making the difference between a successful and unsuccessful player. With that let's go back and look at the original post I quoted: Gyra_Solune posted:i like the core of the story that is following a nice person having to be a relentless jerk because of circumstances. she hates it, everyone hates it, except her boyfriend who is now fantasizing about her brutally stepping on his face, but she has to do it because her dad is thousands of dollars in debt EDIT: That said I guess calling out that point as wrong isn't fair, since she does do some things that are quite cold (taking all her crush' pro point things is kinda low out of context). Twiddy fucked around with this message at 00:14 on Oct 21, 2015 |
# ¿ Oct 21, 2015 00:11 |
|
Xelkelvos posted:The best way is Midrange. Enough firepower to make creatures unignorable, enough removal to deny them a board. Basically the only consistent line between all the most hated decks throughout history is that they were the best deck.
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2015 04:41 |
|
Yes_Cantaloupe posted:The main thing is that she feels like she's being a relentless jerk. That's what matters for the story's purpose. Basically, the post I quoted framed it as a story where a good girl is doing bad things because of necessity, which while partially true (again, all of a sudden stealing all her not-boyfriends pro points out of nowhere), but the permission playing interacts with that in an interesting way because it has a certain perception of being bad, but is really just another way to play the game.
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2015 05:17 |
|
Gyra_Solune posted:you're going to love the next opponent in wizard's soul then
|
# ¿ Oct 21, 2015 05:33 |
|
OneDeadman posted:Really the thing bothering me is that Manaka is living the dream where a Transformative sideboard isn't a terrible gimmick. Transformative sideboards tend to be common for a certain definition of what "transformative" means, especially when doing a minor step like going from permission to a different type of control. Not sure what she's pulling to go to a mill deck though.
|
# ¿ Oct 22, 2015 06:56 |
|
Know what hasn't been updated at all for months and months? Wizard's Soul. I want some more cardboard crack sometime.
|
# ¿ Jan 22, 2016 05:57 |
|
Honestly I'm fine with Zoglin just giving us the most accurate F/SN manga adaptation.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2016 20:58 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 10:25 |
|
It's worth noting that if they're following Magic style rules, the name of the card is its identity. All cards with the same name are treated as the same card in official rules. That said, the text of a card can change due to a reprint and difference in how text is worded or because of errata. In tournaments, you'll frequently find people using older versions of the same card that has slightly different wording than the most recent copy. All that said, this is probably just a slight retcon or error.
|
# ¿ Apr 30, 2016 05:34 |