Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
rudatron
May 31, 2011

by Fluffdaddy
Vertical farms won't work, mass vegetarianism is probably going to be mandatory, as is public transit being the dominant transport option - granting every man, woman and child the 1 1/2 tonnes of steel/aluminium for private car ownership can't scale. Nukes everywhere, Hydro everywhere, and you're probably going to want to integrate power-plant waste heat output and pipe that into home heating (especially hot-water), which is going to mean small city sizes and high density. You're also going to want to minimize commute distance, so the topology will be:
  • Apartment blocks built near and oriented towards local industry/power plants (think Magnitogorsk/Chernobyl)
  • Abundant Mass transit/cycling options
  • surrounded by farmland focused on cereals/legumes/fruit.
  • Good rail connection and integration into the local industry.
Whether these 'blocks' are placed right next to each other, or spaced far apart, I'm not sure, but I feel like they'd be more efficient being right next to each other. So you'd have these huge mega-cities with rail as the dominant logistics network, surrounded by farmland, with the rest outside-the-logistic-network/in-difficult-to-reach-places left to nature.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread