Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Effectronica posted:

And with that said, your argument is ridiculous because it leads to women having absurd levels of physical weakness that are trivially disprovable. Like, a 155 artillery shell weighs about a hundred pounds. Your contention is thus that the majority of women are incapable of ever lifting their own body weight without steroid abuse, by implication. Even adding a less silly qualifier about this applying to women just out of civilian life only, which goes directly against your statements, you're still in a realm where no women work in physically demanding jobs and where endurance is apparently less important than raw upper-body strength to physical labor. Like, historically, your statements are basically horseshit.
Not questioning your overall point necessarily, but isn't there more to it than just the question of whether you can lift a shell? You'd also have to be able to do it in a safe and controlled manner, and probably pretty fast too.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread