Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.

blowfish posted:

Hmm you just gave members of a species living in small roving groups with occasional contact eating a varied diet of intermittently no-to-moderate starch/sugar things a way to sit on top of each other by the thousand continuously while munching on grains and wading through pig poo poo? Oh gosh, the incidence of disease initially increased until they adapted to changed conditions, what a shock!

e: we should, however, note that all the peoples that became unhealthy fat sedentary goons with rotten teeth and no body hygiene nonetheless conquered the world while hunter-gatherers are probably in the minority even among the isolated peoples that people itt want to put in nature reserves isolated reservations

I don't really see how how you're arguing against what he's saying though? Are we all agreeing that early agricultural societies probably had a lower quality of life? also its hardly surprising that hunter gatherer groups are a minority, the lifestyle simply can't sustain anywhere near the same number of people that agriculture can, but again that doesn't really say anything about quality of life before the industrial revolution.

Liberal_L33t posted:

The kind of lifestyles you are championing is equally unsustainable for socio-political reasons, which is to say "Existing at the mercy of natural forces and primitive social systems is a living hell that most people will choose to escape from, given the chance." Note that these 'uncontacted societies' are usually only able to maintain control over their members and prevent desertion to modern settlements because of geographical barriers like oceans and forests. Any efforts to return to the nightmarish state of primitivism you idolize would unavoidably resemble the latter stages of Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge purges.

Can I just say something, there is a recent theory that supposedly 'Primitive' peoples that lived on the outskirts of civilization (think Montagnards in Southeast Asia) might not represent some remnant of pre-civilized culture but were actually previous members of said civilized society who hosed off to the mountains or forests to leave behind of the major social or economic problems that more Civilized societies had to deal with, have a lighthearted video on the issue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wyzi9GNZFMU

khwarezm fucked around with this message at 22:33 on Oct 12, 2015

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread