|
Carbon dioxide posted:I don't think these are quite to scale. Ego boost.png right there.
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2015 15:18
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 10:29 |
|
|
This is actually rather effective at communicating its dumb-rear end point.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2015 14:53
|
|
|
Mak0rz posted:Jews: five times more privileged than Christians. Also: scientists as unprivileged as poor people. The whole thing is satire.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 27, 2015 18:27
|
|
|
That's a great graph. It makes a point through hyperbole and intentionally chooses a poor informational layout to make its point more visually striking. Good communication skills.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2015 18:12
|
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:Yeah, welcome to the world of double digit penis length for almost every one. Glorious cock socialism. It's okay, everyone would know that if it starts with a 1, it's tiny.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 17, 2015 16:21
|
|
|
Stoatbringer posted:An infographic rather than a chart, but still pretty terrible. When I think "Cheat sheet", I think "unnecessary visual clutter"
|
|
#
¿
Dec 28, 2015 21:18
|
|
|
What's most amusing is how the correct spelling of masturbation didn't make the list.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2016 19:37
|
|
|
I'm going to object more to the use of splines for a radar chart to make puke looking shapes.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 13, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Maybe it's just because I took too much math in college, but this chart communicates a rather complicated notion(assuming it uses any sort of meaningful data) pretty effectively, and I'd certainly ding it for style, the substance seems really good.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 15, 2016 05:51
|
|
|
Thoughtless posted:What planet do these people live on where a book costs more than a video game, or a downloaded movie costs more than a movie at the theatre? This graph may not have been populated with honest average costs.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 18, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
Travis343 posted:loss.jpg getting really abstract these days A loss.jpg reference is definitely not a joke, and I have no intention of making light of it. And it can be a tough and emotional thing for threads to go through, speaking from personal experience. And I know that it's often much harder on the reader than on the poster. However, I also know that it doesn't necessarily turn you into a sad, depressed sack of tears for the rest of your life. People can move past it, and heal. But seriously. It's not a joke.
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
I'm the hexagon that says "consumer shaming"
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2016 00:35
|
|
|
Oh my god I was with this girl and she labeled her axes right there in front of me.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 8, 2016 02:17
|
|
|
om nom nom posted:Freakanomics had a thing that said there was an issue with murders in Japan that if the cops weren't 100% sure they could solve/convict someone would be classified as "found body" and never investigated criminally. Something about the cops not wanting to hurt their name or record with unsolved cases, so they would just avoid having a tough case to solve in the first place. Man, combined with what I've learned about Japan's legal system from playing video games, it sounds like they're just full of perverse incentives.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 23:08
|
|
|
Oxyclean posted:
You know, if they hadn't tried to force a "there's an intersection of all of these" absolute rule into their graph, and by extension included a bunch of tenuous connections, this graph would only have been ugly, instead of ugly and meaningless.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2016 05:20
|
|
|
Snapchat A Titty posted:classic phono supra-lex Oh, you're right. And its needlessly pretentious. I forget that that's offputting because I'm a pretentious rear end too. They could have used "word part" and "word" and "multi-word" and "phrase" for their rows.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2016 18:48
|
|
|
Clearly the most important social force in play in 1941 was collective condemnation of violence against women. Clearly.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 31, 2016 20:34
|
|
|
Carbon dioxide posted:I know it's a table, not a graph, but it's just too perfect to not post it here. What's the joke?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 22, 2016 17:43
|
|
|
Yep, definitely some impossible graphs there. And let's not miss the fact that there's no scatter plots. Definitely brewed up by someone who doesn't know what science looks like.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 31, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
goose willis posted:As we all know, the Christian Dark Ages had such a drastic effect on distant localities such as the rest of the non-European world, and furthermore Um, clearly you're not a rational modern atheist who knows that only white people advance science and technology.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2017 16:49
|
|
|
That's I-love-engaging-with-brands.png right there. gently caress the 21st century and everything about it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2017 22:04
|
|
|
I can't believe how lovely the candy choices of the center left are. Snickers are terrible.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 23:34
|
|
|
This seems like a well composed graph that communicates its correlation well. Using actual data no less. It's not at all like those "hole left by Christian dark ages" things
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 15:12
|
|
|
I don't see what's wrong with this. It perfectly captures how cluttered and unusable the blender UI is
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2017 15:37
|
|
|
Memri TV is some of the most bullshity bullshit to ever get on the internet.
|
|
#
¿
May 1, 2017 02:44
|
|
|
Rich people being duped by Ponzi schemes isn't a kink. It's hot to everyone
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2017 14:00
|
|
|
Nice obscure username post combo.
|
|
#
¿
May 5, 2017 21:17
|
|
|
HardDiskD posted:But this is a good thing. Less hole => more donut. Americans are fat
|
|
#
¿
May 10, 2017 15:26
|
|
|
Every one of those circles you overlap with makes you more obnoxious.
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
Nuevo posted:Tangential, but go to pornhub and search for minecraft. Sssssssssssss
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2017 17:54
|
|
|
Groke posted:There's always a penis somewhere, that should go without saying. There is a penis inside u right now.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 9, 2017 23:06
|
|
|
Take tabs of acid and space out.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 16, 2017 19:51
|
|
|
Glazier posted:Holy poo poo! What it’s saying is how rich is the median person of a generation compared to the previous generations at the same age. So ever since the boomers medium net worth has been on a downward trajectory And millennials now have a median 84% less wealth than other generations at their age. Acacado toast 
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 13:31
|
|
|
Bird in a Blender posted:That huge drop appears to mostly be because of lack of property wealth. Younger people either can't afford to buy property because prices are too high, or if they did buy property, values have not gone up. Older generations were able to buy cheaper property and then values have skyrocketed over the last couple of decades. It's the accumulation of wealth by very few individuals that started in an era where social mobility was still possible. It's not that boomers are well off, it's that the people who are well off happen to be boomers.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 22, 2017 16:30
|
|
|
I still hold that d100% chance is the most asinine thing I've heard of from that game.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2017 22:11
|
|
|
Rumda posted:Cross posting from D&D My God, this is fractal wrongness. Once you get past the "IQ is by definition set with a mean of 100 for the current year" There's the "using temporally grounded measures, IQ has been increasing approximately 8-10 points a generation for several generations especially in 'minority' populations" Flynn effect that says litterally the opposite of this chart. There's STILL just... Ugh. What do these morons think IQ measures?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2017 20:03
|
|
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:I think you've all missed the fact that the current year isn't even halfway along the x-axis on that graph. It's more than 50% projection (i.e. bullshit random guessing), all the way to the year 2110. Believe me, I didn't miss that part of it either. There's so many layers to the stupid. Why is it people obsessed with intelligence are always the dumbest motherfuckers?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2017 21:34
|
|
|
Zemyla posted:Whiteness + conservativism - empathy. High IQ past the first standard deviation correlates strongly with liberalism or leftist beliefs though. And the average IQ of both self identified liberals and conservatives is about the same. I mean that's literally what the research says, since I've read it, like an IQ obsessed rear end in a top hat.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2017 02:12
|
|
|
The Cheshire Cat posted:He wasn't saying what IQ ACTUALLY means, though. He was saying what the kinds of people who make those "The world is getting dumber because there's more brown people!" charts THINK it means. I know.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2017 02:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 10:29 |
|
|
Strudel Man posted:Aren't those two things incompatible? Unless low IQ also correlates with liberalism, to balance it out. It, does, in fact, because poor people being hosed by the system tend to have liberal leanings and low iqs
|
|
#
¿
Jul 22, 2017 02:47
|
|