|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2016 22:02
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 10:03 |
|
|
I'm the 2% of Hillary supporters who believe she's an actual demon.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2016 18:36
|
|
|
Noted symbol of anarchy, the Articles of Confederation also, noted socialists, the Taliban
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2016 04:41
|
|
|
Regalingualius posted:The million dollar question is what political perspective this is coming from. In my experience, 99% of political position charts are made by libertarians.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 9, 2016 07:59
|
|
|
Why is China represented with a
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:I want the meta version where you place this chart on itself. The Wall Street Journal.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 13, 2016 07:44
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Jan 30, 2017 05:00
|
|
|
Considering the demographics of non-voters in the US, mandatory voting would probably benefit Democrats immensely. For that reason, it's never going to happen here.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2017 19:42
|
|
|
Have they ever heard of the expression "damning with faint praise"
|
|
#
¿
Feb 9, 2017 03:56
|
|
|
Even if you're banking on the audience not noticing the y axis being is on a messed up scale, this seems like a horrible recruitment tool. It's admitting that less than 1% of people involved earn an above average income and the vast majority make peanuts (and I'm sure this is after they've hosed with the numbers enough to hide the fact that most people lose money from these schemes).
|
|
#
¿
Mar 5, 2017 19:22
|
|
|
Tiggum posted:How is it backpedalling? It's not a pie chart and they never said it was a pie chart. I've seen attempts at pie charts that are worse than that. In this very thread, in fact. I could totally believe this was the work of some idiot intern who doesn't really understand pie charts.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
I remember reading a book about modern Chinese government where the author said that the PRC tends to be very reasonable in trade negotiations and open to compromise on most geopolitical issues as long as they don't attract much popular attention back home, but once the news gets out, they go into full blustering national pride mode and it's impossible to get anything done until the media frenzy dies down.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 00:52
|
|
|
I thought it was pretty obvious that chart was talking exclusively about colored candy, not the things that common candy flavors are based on. This isn't some sperg who's never eaten a fruit before, it's a ranking of candy flavors.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 17, 2017 14:35
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Doesn't porn make up like 30% of the internet or something? I thought it'd be bigger (haha, that'd what she said etc etc) It's possible that while porn may be one of the most popular types of traffic, porn traffic is more distributed and less top-heavy than these other categories, so you see relatively few top sites but lots and lots of smaller ones that wouldn't show up on a top 100 list.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2017 15:53
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:Reddit, I want to say. It's a meme in r/badhistory. I think it's been around since before Reddit got huge. I remember seeing it in 2010/2011 or so.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 26, 2017 15:10
|
|
|
Yeah, aside from intense media pressure, reddit will also come down on a subreddit if the mods encourage doxxing. That's what got /r/fatpeoplehate and /r/altright shut down.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 31, 2017 22:15
|
|
|
Not surprised that teenagers find something named after Wall Street lame. I'm kind of surprised about Vice, though. Is there something else called Vice other then the media company that might be messing with the data?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
greazeball posted:When and how did Oreos get so cool? Have you ever had an Oreo? They're good.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
Reminds me of this graph of sports and political affiliations.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 16:16
|
|
|
ranbo das posted:Never woulda guessed WWE had a super left-leaning following. Also lol at the WNBA When this chart's come up before, the explanation I've seen for the WWE is that its fanbase is primarily young and poor and also in recent years more and more Hispanic, though I'm not sure if that was the case when the data was collected in 2008-2009. My own anecdotal evidence is that every wrestling fan I know is a twenty/thirty-something nerd.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 17:40
|
|
|
Somfin posted:It was to avoid too much poo poo breaking. There's a startling amount of code out there that specifically does not work on any OS that identifies itself as "Windows 9[*]". That's the common explanation I see, but I think it's more likely that focus groups just liked "Windows 10" better than "Windows 9."
|
|
#
¿
Apr 10, 2017 15:07
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 16:00
|
|
|
My Lovely Horse posted:Kinda curious where the data comes from. The author on Reddit used yearbooks.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 16:19
|
|
|
Little Boy was 15 KILOtons TNT, not 15 tons. Big difference.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 23:10
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 19:03
|
|
|
BrigadierSensible posted:So is the strategy having multiple Republican candidates to split the vote, and then in the run-off election hope people will vote for "anyone but a democrat"? The GOP almost certainly would have preferred for all but one of the Republican candidates to drop out so it's not really their first choice of strategy but it's what they have to work with.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
Carados posted:It's a weird election format but unless there is a huge majority (50% above the second place) it runs off the top two candidates, so having multiple republicans doesn't really change anything. It's not 50% above second place, it's just straight 50% + 1. Also technically there are a few other Democrats and even more Republicans in the race but the remaining Democrats are looking to combine for no more than ~1500 votes. Pakled has a new favorite as of 05:19 on Apr 19, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 05:16
|
|
|
Carados posted:Misunderstood, my fault. Having so many candidates wasn't a conscious decision on the GOP's part. It just worked out that none of the GOP candidates ever commanded a huge lead over the others and while Handel was the frontrunner, 2-3 had a shot all the way up to election day and the party can't force them to drop out and they'd all rather cling to their small chance of victory, so they stuck it through.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 06:35
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 17:50
|
|
|
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2017 06:27
|
|
|
It's a fantasy fetish thing.
|
|
#
¿
May 4, 2017 23:16
|
|
|
What happened in Season 17, he seemed to paint less of everything then
|
|
#
¿
May 27, 2017 04:44
|
|
|
Not even in CK2 have I seen such advanced incest
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2017 05:04
|
|
|
Son of Thunderbeast posted:oh my god Islamic Fundamentalism: the natural middle ground between Zionism and Socialism.
|
|
#
¿
Aug 3, 2017 05:20
|
|
|
Chitin posted:I've always loved the double think involved in "regressive left." There are definitely some groups on the left I'd classify as "regressive" who use aspects of leftist or progressive ideology to justify racism/sexism/homophobia/etc. Like TERFs or Hoteps or leftists who are against immigration from a "the capitalist class uses immigration to drive down the price of labor" perspective. But those groups are never who conservatives are talking about when they say "regressive left" so
|
|
#
¿
Aug 7, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
trapped mouse posted:Nope, 5 years ago they voted to become a state. Congress just decided not to do anything about it. It's kinda complicated. That vote isn't the best representation since there still wasn't a straight majority for statehood, just a plurality, when you factor in all the blank votes for that question left by most of the pro-status quo people. The 2017 referendum was also questionable because pro-status quo people boycotted it and as a result, turnout was abysmal. Of course, the Republicans' main reason for not letting them become a state is because they'd be a Democratic stronghold but hey
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2017 02:16
|
|
|
Jurgan posted:Iraq and Iran- friends? They were definitely enemies under Saddam, but I thought they were still enemies because Iran sends forces into Iraq to destabilize them. They're friends because they're both majority-Shia, they have an interest in curtailing the power of Saudi Arabia and Wahhabism, and they do a lot of trade.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
In a similar vein, this is what a literacy test black people had to pass to vote in the Jim Crow era South looked like. This particular one was 30 questions in total, this is just the first page.  The questions were deliberately vague so the examiner could fail anyone they wanted (all black people).
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2017 02:51
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ludicrousscenes/status/880385037790851072
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 13, 2024 10:03 |
|
|
noether posted:
I'm fascism having high economic freedom
|
|
#
¿
Nov 17, 2017 22:19
|
|
