|
Death? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Love it! |
|
49 | 28.00% |
| Leave it! |
|
59 | 33.71% |
| That is not dead which can eternal lie... |
|
67 | 38.29% |
| Total: | 175 votes | ||
|
Only Responsible Gun Owners can know a gun.
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:45
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 22:20 |
|
|
CommieGIR posted:What about troubled Well, seeing as one is a major problem in the black community and one is just a snarky comment on your behalf, I believe the former is more worthy of funding.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:46
|
|
|
Flowers For Algeria posted:Hmm. Such a law would never be passed. Also I do not own guns as they were all lost in a freak boating accident. What does this deflection have to do with the clarification that I posted and you abruptly sidestepped? A hypothetical: you are a loon with no grounding on how the world actually works.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:53
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:Well, seeing as one is a major problem in the black community and one is just a snarky comment on your behalf, I believe the former is more worthy of funding. Lol look at this guy can even he believe what he says?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:54
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:Such a law would never be passed. Then why does every toy loving freak thinking Obama is coming from there guns?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
Well now we're adding "such a law would never be passed" on top of "state and local LEOs would ignore it," "federal LEOs would ignore it," "federal LEOs would get killed trying to enforce it," and "the President would be deposed if they attempted to follow up on the dead federal LEOs." Oh, and "court challenges for decades." So what the hell are y'all so nervous about then?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:hmmm yes he's just shrugging and going #notallgunowners you're right Ah, "you people". What other groups do you enjoy generalizing?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:55
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:Such a law would never be passed. Also I do not own guns as they were all lost in a freak boating accident. i don't think you know what a hypothetical is
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:56
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:Ah, "you people". What other groups do you enjoy generalizing? you got me guy, i'm tired of anti-gun control goons posting in bad faith and being insulting dickweeds who refuse to engage with others while insisting everyone engage with their ideas, that's the same thing as racism
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:58
|
|
|
Flowers For Algeria posted:Hahaha, why was I expecting anything other than a deflection? 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 05:59
|
|
|
NNick posted:Then why does every toy loving freak thinking Obama is coming from there guns? Because not all do, yet the ones that do cause panic buying which makes things like ammo more scarce for those who dont think he's coming for the guns? Dunno dude, not many people even in tfr believe he could do such a thing.mDoesnt mean that he is not the cause of hoarding.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:05
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:you got me guy, i'm tired of anti-gun control goons posting in bad faith and being insulting dickweeds who refuse to engage with others while insisting everyone engage with their ideas, that's the same thing as racism You truly are the worst. Even tezzor at his worst is a better poster than you. At least he is entertaining.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:You truly are the worst. Even tezzor at his worst is a better poster than you. At least he is entertaining. im sorry i have upset you, you'll just have to find someone new to drop your sick nasty burns on while continuing to pretend to want to debate gun control
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:09
|
|
|
There is nothing to debate. Guns are not going anywhere, they are fun and pretty awesome.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Would you say that Obama and the Gun Grabbin' Hordes are - if you will - both strong and weak, depending on the shift of rhetorical focus?Cartouche posted:There is nothing to debate. Guns are not going anywhere, they are fun and pretty awesome.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Hey dickeye, guns are good, murder is low enough and gun laws are stupid. Most people understand this which is why gun control doesn't go anywhere, bullshit push polls and concerned mom marches notwithstanding e: beaten, somehow woke wedding drone fucked around with this message at 06:15 on Oct 25, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:12
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:Doesnt mean that he is not the cause of hoarding. Hahahah. Yep, it's Obama not all of the "law abiding gun owners" who shoot up schools/churches/etc and and then are disowned by "law abiding gun owners' who are in the same breath willing to shoot at federal officers to take away their precious toys  and react to said shooting by buying more guns. Can someone who wants unfettered access to guns explain why the US has a unique problem with gun violence AND suicide the rest of the developed nations do not? Is it also Obama? You can also provide a positive viewpoint on these issues, but I haven't seen one reasonable prognosis or policy solution.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:13
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Would you say that Obama and the Gun Grabbin' Hordes are - if you will - both strong and weak, depending on the shift of rhetorical focus? Hold on loosely, but dont let go. If you cling to tightly, youre going to lose control.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:14
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Hey dickeye, guns are good, murder is low enough i've said this before but i was raised in a hunting family. i like guns. i think guns are cool as poo poo. i enjoy shooting guns. i have not had the chance to do it in years but it was always something i enjoyed doing. living in the burbs i have to settle for an air rifle and tin cans in the treeline but i think saying murder is low enough when there's a mass shooting every week or two is kinda dumb bruh
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:16
|
|
|
Literally The Worst posted:i've said this before but i was raised in a hunting family. i like guns. i think guns are cool as poo poo. i enjoy shooting guns. i have not had the chance to do it in years but it was always something i enjoyed doing. living in the burbs i have to settle for an air rifle and tin cans in the treeline And you like to pretend that it is the white racist man who is commiting the vast majority. Any nod toward the bulk of said mass shootings is considered "bad faith" by you. The "kinda dumb" feels a eminating from your own keyboard... bruh.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:19
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:And you like to pretend that it is the white racist man who is commiting the vast majority. Any nod toward the bulk of said mass shootings is considered "bad faith" by you. quote the posts where i said that please edit no doing some smug "oh so generalization is bad NOW" bullshit either, you disingenuous shithead. you're specifically saying that these are things i've said, you need to back that up
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:21
|
|
|
So are you saying black people should have MORE guns, LESS guns, THE SAME AMOUNT of guns? Should the guns be distributed differently? What is the assertion about black people now
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:21
|
|
|
LeJackal posted:Actually hunting is an important part of conservation and wildlife management. In addition, many families and individuals still hunt as a means for survival, to actually have enough food. Wildlife management and hunting for sport do not completely overlap. I'd be in favor of subsidizing these families and their access to food. Having to resort to actual hunting for your own food is pretty weird, but not immoral as would be hunting for sport though. LeJackal posted:So just about every firearm is exempt from your proposals. Thats neato. The primary purpose of many many guns is not hunting. They wouldn't be useful for that. They aren't used for that. No serious hunter uses them for hunting. LeJackal posted:No, there are a number of categories that are technically sound and distinct. Smoothbore versus rifled, categorization by their mechanism of action, caliber, open versus closed bolt, method of loading, and so on. These distinctions aren't arbitrary in the slightest. Denying that most guns are made with a certain purpose in mind for each of them is the peak of absurdity. Why do you think there is so much variety among guns? LeJackal posted:I don't even understand this part. Would you abandon such categories as "small arms" vs. "light weapons"? What about "long gun"? Are these categories meaningless? And demanding that the classification of guns limit itself to technical categories is a red herring. Because we can classify guns according to their purpose, and that's absolutely legitimate. If we want to create a category called "hunting guns", that regroups guns that are used for hunting, we can. If there's no way I can make this distinction, I'm going to have to abandon the idea of an exception for hunting. I'm sorry, LeJackal, but if it can't be done, then it can't be done. LeJackal posted:Too cumbersome? By what standard? What is cumbersome? Overall length? Weight? What do you mean by disproportionate lethality? LingcodKilla posted:Why are you so creepy? Like seriously this is the sandbox but drat dude ... Of almost all the posters here you seem like the one most likely to be furiously jacking off over the deaths of others. What about a law that mandated registration and permits? What would you do? Would you comply?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:22
|
|
|
Nessus posted:So are you saying black people should have MORE guns, LESS guns, THE SAME AMOUNT of guns? Should the guns be distributed differently? What is the assertion about black people now Personally I'm not worried about it
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:24
|
|
|
I'd like to point out that none of the pro-gun people around here has come out and said "I would be a law-abiding citizen and surrender my guns if the law mandated it". Nor have they even deigned to say "I would register my gun and get a permit if the law mandated it". I am not sure any person who wouldn't say these things ought to own a gun.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:25
|
|
|
SedanChair posted:Personally I'm not worried about it you know guys i don't think sedanchair is really
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:26
|
|
|
Appologies. Got you confused with CommieGIR posted:What about troubled
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:29
|
|
|
Nessus posted:So are you saying black people should have MORE guns, LESS guns, THE SAME AMOUNT of guns? Should the guns be distributed differently? What is the assertion about black people now I am not one in here saying who should and who should not have guns.  edit: or maybe I am saying that the guns are not the root of the violent events? Cartouche fucked around with this message at 06:38 on Oct 25, 2015 |
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:33
|
|
|
Y'all hate the constitution. You are asking a question that implies our government as it currently stands has been ripped apart and rewritten. It has no foundation in reality so I'll give you an appropriate answer. gently caress yah I'd go full wolverine while you cower behind your blue helmeted commie thug/ mercenaries. It would be glorious. WOLVERINES!!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:38
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:Y'all hate the constitution. You are asking a question that implies our government as it currently stands has been ripped apart and rewritten. It has no foundation in reality so I'll give you an appropriate answer. Never go full wolverine. Look at what it got Timothy Michael Howel (however you spell it). I like to think I would be the introspective Patrick Swayze type. BECAUSE WE LIVE HERE
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:40
|
|
|
Actually I'm just trying to understand why you guys are so paranoid when there's apparently like six interlocking systems that prevent gun control legislation from occurring
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:42
|
|
|
LingcodKilla posted:Y'all hate the constitution. You are asking a question that implies our government as it currently stands has been ripped apart and rewritten. It has no foundation in reality so I'll give you an appropriate answer. gently caress the constitution, but gently caress the people who want to replace it with a stock photo of a man evincing sympathy even harder
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Actually I'm just trying to understand why you guys are so paranoid when there's apparently like six interlocking systems that prevent gun control legislation from occurring Who are these "guys" you are referencing?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
Nessus posted:Actually I'm just trying to understand why you guys are so paranoid when there's apparently like six interlocking systems that prevent gun control legislation from occurring because what do you think the sixth way is
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:44
|
|
|
I'm smiling because the 2nd Amendment does not prevent gun control. So what will you do, Cartouche, LingcodKilla, if gun control is passed? Will you register your guns? Will you apply for a permit? I don't care if you think it's impossible. It's not.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:46
|
|
|
Flowers For Algeria posted:I'm smiling because the 2nd Amendment does not prevent gun control. So what will you do, Cartouche, LingcodKilla, if gun control is passed? Will you register your guns? Will you apply for a permit? If you say so. Only the most idiotic politician would push for gun control at this point. They would be commiting political suicide. Fittingly involving a gun.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:48
|
|
|
Flowers For Algeria posted:I'm smiling because the 2nd Amendment does not prevent gun control. So what will you do, Cartouche, LingcodKilla, if gun control is passed? Will you register your guns? Will you apply for a permit? Gun control was already passed, we're out here scrupulously buying from dealers, filling out paperwork and not having machine guns, thanks 
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:49
|
|
|
Don't forget the hearing protection we could enjoy from suppressors, because of THAT "common sense" regulation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:52
|
|
|
Cartouche posted:Who are these "guys" you are referencing? Cartouche posted:Such a law would never be passed. Also I do not own guns as they were all lost in a freak boating accident. DeusExMachinima posted:For once, you're within the neighborhood of being right. The majority would give up. But even if you waved a magic wand that made every semi-automatic vanish *and* 99.99% of American gun owners folded, you're still looking at a larger force than AQI at its peak, armed with bolt-action hunting rifles that just so happen to be great for sniper attacks. tumblr.txt posted:To many people, widespread confiscation is pissing all over the constitution, and honestly has a chance of starting a civil war.
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:54
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 2, 2024 22:20 |
|
|
Cartouche posted:If you say so. I notice that you're still failing to answer the question. Is it because you're afraid to admit you'd stop being a law-abiding citizen, or because you're afraid of looking weak because you'd obey the law?
|
|
#
?
Oct 25, 2015 06:55
|
|