Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
rjmccall
Sep 7, 2007

no worries friend
Fun Shoe
Welp, the offense is back to needing literally everything to go right to even get a first down. And the o-line managed to have an even shittier night than Kaepernick. But at least we got to see Russell Wilson get ground into the dirt a couple times.

Now, for sitting on a bus in traffic for another hour.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

rjmccall
Sep 7, 2007

no worries friend
Fun Shoe
Yeah, the coverage seemed beatable, which is a new and encouraging prospect when playing the Seahawks. It just couldn't be beaten by Kaep, because he really, really sucked. Saying that he was rushed on some of those throws is both true and useless, because hitting your windows anyway (as opposed to the windows of the press box) is part of what makes a good quarterback. Anybody can look good with a clean pocket.

rjmccall
Sep 7, 2007

no worries friend
Fun Shoe

BlindSite posted:

While the packers have got to be favourites. The packers offensive line isn't fantastic and their defense is real bad.

Actually the Packers defense has stepped up and it's been their offense that looks beatable somehow despite the continued presence and good health of Aaron Rodgers. I wouldn't give the Panthers the edge, but they're probably a good bet.

  • Locked thread