|
YES! I'm here for this. It will be glorious.
|
# ¿ Oct 26, 2015 01:25 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 18:43 |
|
Agrajag posted:im being super serious posting here now: how does ben poop, pee, and shower? i've asked before and i have yet to get an answer. like seriously his arms dont even have full range of motion.
|
# ¿ Nov 3, 2015 02:07 |
|
fuctifino posted:CiG has some new competition Sure does. https://swgreborn.com/
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2015 02:50 |
|
Mirificus posted:Not sure if you saw this the other day but it highlights the terrible CS wait times and then it was closed for not "contributing". Thanks I updated it, as well as some other things. Also, We want to see how many people are being denied refunds, how much they are owed, when these shenanigans began, etc. Email is at the top of the article for anyone who wants to help.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2015 21:00 |
|
jaffyjaffy posted:Welp my refund got denied. If you have the email chain still could you forward it to info@informationredux.com ? Trying to get some hard numbers on these refunds so we can get a good look at what is happening.
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2015 22:42 |
|
Dirty Hairy posted:Well, got my refund denial letter today. I guess that means it's game on. Has anyone made any inroads with chargebacks when a credit card was used through PayPal? My purchases range from 2013 to a few months ago. I saw Beer's advice from a few pages ago, and I've been collecting tidbits from this thread over the last six weeks for the predicted eventuality that they'd try to gently caress me over. Still, if anyone successfully gets their money back from a credit card purchase channeled through PayPal, post your experience. Could you forward the email chain to info@informationredux.com ? I'm gathering some data on these like dates of communications with cig, how much was spent, how long it is taking them to deny a request, etc (basically just numbers). Also, has anyone got a refund since the refund denials have started?
|
# ¿ Dec 20, 2015 23:14 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:InfoRedux is working on a story. Or something. At least a spreadsheet of denial request info like dates and averages of some stuff. I'll link it if we get enough data. I am unaware of any messages, though. So I don't think it has to do with that. Or maybe it does, wtf do I know? I don't work here.
|
# ¿ Dec 21, 2015 05:50 |
|
Merry Christmas you all.
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2015 18:57 |
|
I felt inspired by all of you and used my limited photoshoppy skills to make you all a pretty .jpg. fixed because this one looks better. VenusRedux fucked around with this message at 03:24 on Jan 7, 2016 |
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 03:18 |
|
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 04:12 |
|
Khanstant posted:Lazy and messy as gently caress but you get the idea: Haha awesome.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 09:29 |
|
You know I really hope Chris Roberts appreciates everything that has gone into this/these threads. He is truly inspiring. A legend to be remembered.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 09:34 |
|
This is a useful image. lol at Dolvak. Wow. Also haha you losers with avatars. No one wants that. These guys would never dare do it to me.
|
# ¿ Jan 8, 2016 08:52 |
|
Beer4TheBeerGod posted:INN never contacted me. lol what a shocking turn of events.
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2016 05:10 |
|
They have a German arm of this company that directs back to Ortwin, right? It could easily be someone in or close to someone in the company in Germany.
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2016 22:36 |
|
grimcreaper posted:Quit honestly, ifthe game does get released, i expect Vanduul to be replaced by Goons or Goonduul. GUUN
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2016 22:51 |
|
Been looking into some things. Mainly Wulf bitching about his FOIA request to the FTC on CIG. Which is annoying because, well, this: quote:The FOIA does not apply to private companies https://www.ftc.gov/about-ftc/foia Now the FOIA is a complicated law and I am no lawyer but, you know, it seems pretty drat clear to me.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 02:20 |
|
Ghostlight posted:The FTC isn't a private company and is subject to FOIA which is exactly why they have an entire section on their homepage extensively covering FOIA requests. Hope that clears things up. Yea, that's why I put it here to see what others thought. Didn't think about it literally saying don't go to a private company to request something citing FOIA. I wonder though if the FTC would reveal an active investigation via the FOIA?
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 02:31 |
|
D_Smart posted:It's not that. the wording of the response is clear. Whatever he asked for, thry can't provide. Especially if there was such an investigation. I covered this months ago. Yea the letter says they can't find something matching his request. Not like they would say, oh yea well what you asked for doesn't match but hey we have this thing over here...
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 02:32 |
|
Ghostlight posted:No, that's one of the things they are expressly exempted from providing, which is why the request is so goddamn stupid. That's what I figured. Thanks for the clarification. And to contribute:
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 05:46 |
|
Hillary Clintons Thong posted:I had fun making it thats all that matters Amazing.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 05:51 |
|
Has anyone been denied refunds since after the holidays? We were getting responses but they stopped after the new year. Curious if they started refunding again or what's up with that. The replies I have are from different countries, and the average time to deny is 48 days. All the emails have been very close to the 48 day mark too, but I'd like more data if anyone has any?
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 21:53 |
|
Mirificus posted:They are weird. First off, that's loving retarded. lol this dude thinks he's original and made that poo poo up.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 22:35 |
|
imperialparadox posted:I find it doubtful that INN will actually get with Beer about the emails - the end result will be that the emails are proven real and CIG/Sandi looks dumb(er), and INN can't do that as CIG's self-appointed mouthpiece. I love how Dolvak had plenty of time to respond so quickly with an article but they have been given days to prove Beer's letter is really fake/real and now no time! I don't care if it's not Dolvak but another one of those pricks that Beer trusts to do it, get it loving done. Make some loving time or take it the gently caress down and apologize. So I doubt they will get with Beer, too. Why would they?
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 20:14 |
|
My cattes want to be considered for inclusions in funny things: Also I wanted to post because it makes a few of these uh, SC fans really mad that I do, for some reason.
|
# ¿ Jan 29, 2016 19:21 |
|
FrankieGoes posted:Just because you were endlessly bitching about Derek doesn't mean you weren't also endlessly bitching about other things. Not sure why you think the two would be mutually exclusive. You should learn to pick your battles you insufferable oval office.
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 21:58 |
|
Scruffpuff posted:Wait, FrankieGoes is Sandi? I'm having trouble keeping track. Quick poll: who in this thread does not work for CIG? I have it on good authority that FrankieGoes is indeed Sandi. It's all coming out. 2 WEEKS
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 22:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 4, 2024 18:43 |
|
FrankieGoes posted:Nice meltdown. K How about suck my loving oval office, bitch boy? Let's see what kind of crying we get out of you now. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 22:30 |