|
Its just as subject to regulatory capture as any other system, like arbitration or the way things are now, if not more so depending on requirements for jurors. They just need to make a perfect lie detector test already because most of our systems suck.
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 19:28 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 02:54 |
|
National Service. Young people must give 2 years to the government, an option of which is to be a professional juror. Fill the jury rolls with the innocent and idealistic, those who haven't been corrupted yet. Plus its a great head start on a profession in law/government!
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 19:35 |
|
seiferguy posted:If you think about it, "professional" jurors would be people that have a day job in the court, and I'm sure it'd be much easier to corrupt them with a district attorney that could easily build rapport with them. Thats why you cycle half of them out every year as the young 'uns finish their service. Plus they'll be watched closely during their two years, since they're under government purview like the soldiers, urban reclamation groups, future engineer corps, etc
|
# ¿ Oct 30, 2015 19:59 |