|
I think part of the problem is that their are people who think the first amendment also protects them from criticism. Not censorship, criticism.
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 20:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 11:03 |
|
|
crabcakes66 posted:Agreed. Harassment is harassment. The language used should be pretty irrelevant short of direct and specific threats of violence. Yeah. No one is mad because you disagree with this person, people are mad that you disagree and think the right course of action is to find that person's phone number, leave threating messages and make them fear for their lives in order to get them to shut up.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 20:19
|
|
|
Also, when the UN Puts out some kind of report the USA IMMEDIATELY Has to do what it says.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:08
|
|
|
Popular Thug Drink posted:i don't really have any good examples of what i'm talking about so i'm just going to quote the popehat gamergate guy to make my arguments for me. what were we talking about again? Something about Hippos? Or the pope's hat? Serious Post: Are you talking about sites like the daily dot not having comment sections? Because god forbit a site DOESN'T let you tell the world about thing.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:10
|
|
|
natetimm posted:There's an entire movement going on right now to gut commets sections and lots of sites are on board with it. Vox turned off their commets, for example. You do realize that most sites replaced comment sections with share links for Twitter and Facebook right? So that the site itself doesn't doesn't have to maintain it? Your arguing that news sites no longer having comment sections is an attack on free speech... 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 1, 2015 22:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 11:03 |
|
|
Who What Now posted:I certainly never would thought it'd be so easy to get someone to say "lol, who gives a poo poo about dead homos". Actually kinda sad, really. Dammit, I step away from this thread for twenty minuets...
|
|
#
¿
Nov 2, 2015 01:03
|
|