Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Squalid
Nov 4, 2008

WorldsStrongestNerd posted:

It seems like one of two things are going on
1. Prosecutors are deliberately axing black jurors because of racism on thier part in a broken jury selection process.

2. Prosecutors have good reasons to ax black jurors because black jurors are more likely to have a criminal record, or know the defendant, or be poorly educated, or any of several other reasons. These realities are the result of racism in the rest of society, not a broken juror selection process or racist prosecutors.

This distinction has been raised multiple times so far and I'd just like to make sure everyone understands BOTH these statements can be true. They are not contradictory. An argument that systemic biases disproportionately exclude African-Americans from juries is not an argument that peremptory strikes are not used to disproportionately strike black jurors.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread