Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
falcon2424
May 2, 2005

An easy solution would be to eliminate peremptory challenges for jurors. (Or limit it to like 1/side/case)

If a lawyer wants to strike someone, let them explain their cause, on the record.

If we wanted to get even more strict, we could have the lawyers conduct voir dire via written forms.

This would ensure that everyone gets asked the same questions, and there's no racial bias in how the answers are treated.

Beyond that, the government could pay jurors for missed wages, to minimize hardship exemptions from jury service.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • Locked thread