|
CommieGIR posted:It took good, working cars off the streets, put those cars owners in debt to keep the American Automotive Industry floating, and actually was incredibly environmentally detrimental. It damaged the used car scene for at least a decade or more. Aren't you like guaranteed to die if you get in a crash in one of those things? I mean yeah that would be good for the environment but I don't think Full On Murder Everyone is a politically viable solution.
|
#
¿
Dec 2, 2015 00:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 7, 2024 01:37 |
|
|
I pulled a belt tight around my neck and I'm starting to feel really great. I think I'm going to keep this up forever. Nothing bad has happened yet, so nothing bad ever will.
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2016 23:00
|
|
|
Banana Man posted:Arkane I truly do not understand what you are arguing. What is the whole of the information you link here? Almost every piece you link is either from think tanks or pieces taken out of context from a larger study. Your goalposts have slid considerably, which sure I could agree different information would naturally change your viewpoint, but when something new comes out you're immediately posting something from a defensive point. He believes in the Climategate email scandal conspiracy theory. That should pretty much sum him up entirely.
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
Arkane posted:I mean...I was posting about malfeasance at CRU/Mann before Climategate; it was a hot button issue before any email ever leaked. So yes I believe in that scandal, and no it's not some wacky conspiracy theory. They undermined peer review, thwarted FOIA, conspired to deny data from other researchers, and blatantly deleted data which showed proxy/temperature mismatches in two high-profile temperature reconstructions. They crossed the line from scientists to activists. This is what the conspiracy theory is, yes, so saying you believe it is saying you believe in the conspiracy theory.
|
|
#
¿
May 26, 2016 05:38
|
|
|
Banana Man posted:You should probably take that trip to see the reef Did that last year. Hail Satan.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 17, 2016 20:18
|
|
|
I feel like the chances are very high that we're going to end up trying to do some geoengineering band aid patch that ends up with bad unintended consequences
|
|
#
¿
Oct 19, 2016 00:05
|
|
|
Edit: haha Edit2: to add some content NewForumSoftware posted:Well no, but I'm not naive enough to believe HRC of all people is beholden to campaign promises. She's got a pretty good voting record on environmental issues and she's heading the most progressive Democratic platform in years. Why do you suppose she's going to do an about face on her campaign promises? Lemming fucked around with this message at 19:06 on Oct 26, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Oct 26, 2016 19:01
|
|
|
Ol Standard Retard posted:I mean, climate change is The Issue, full stop. A lot of other things flow from it and will continue to flow more from it, and there is no hope to address it in a real way if Donny becomes president. Not an issue anymore, in the same way an inoperable brain tumor is not an issue so much as terminal
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 07:19
|
|
|
I hope releasing sulfates into the air works and doesn't kill us all even faster
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 07:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 7, 2024 01:37 |
|
|
Hollismason posted:What's the science behind a warm lake equal more snow? I don't understand that. I assume higher temperature means more evaporation of the water and it's still cold enough that it snows instead of rains.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 10, 2016 00:58
|
|