|
Also even at current rates of consumption it will take a really long time to exhaust non-renewable energy resources. If you include nuclear reactors in that we will have energy for millions of years. Also we will probably have fusion reactors in a few centuries or millennium depending on how long it takes society to recover. Geothermal is another option as well. As for food production we will probably have to heavily adapt our farming techniques. Also insects are an essentially limitless supply of food that are easy to grow. We can also currently grow artificial meat in labs and the process will likely become more efficient and cheaper in the future. The big issue with global warming is not mainly going to be survival after society stabilizes, it's the chaotic transition period as famines, sea level rise, political instability, extreme weather, and other factors kill and displace massive amounts of people. Developing countries will be the most vulnerable while developed countries will probably be able to maintain some stability depending their access to clean water and food. Eastern United States and Canada are especially lucky since they have massive amounts of clean water. Basically if nukes aren't launched developed countries will be able to adapt and stabilize once the initial chaos calms down. The sad part is by that point a lot of people will be dead.
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2015 23:37
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 29, 2024 08:42 |
|
|
Global warming is going to be bad, regardless of who was elected, It's just going to be way worse now. The real idiots (in regards to global warming) are those who thought capitalism would adjust to climate change, cause lmao it's going to resist change until the end of humanity, especially now.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 9, 2016 08:39
|
|