|
NewForumSoftware posted:Hahaha yes let's capture the Co2 into ethanol and then burn it back into the atmosphere in airplanes. I'm pretty sure you're just going to end up heating the earth more with that same co2. Could we drink it? Ethanol's the potable -ol. I did some bar napkin calculations. 2014's CO2 emissions would convert to ~1.12 cubic miles of ethanol, or, about 1,235,946,827,918.185 gallons of 200 proof, "liquor." That's 5 bottles of whiskey per man, woman, and child per day to completely negate global CO2 emissions at the 2014 rate. Nevermind.
|
# ¿ Oct 24, 2016 10:25 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 19:33 |
|
Oof, that's right. I completely forgot about metabolite exhalation, e.g. where burned fat goes (into the air as CO2, mostly). How could you store a cubic mile of ethanol, anyways?
|
# ¿ Oct 24, 2016 10:46 |
|
How credible is the doomsaying about [Phytoplankton Collapse] → [Literal Human Extinction] by 2100? Reportedly, 5.5C to 8C should be sufficient to produce sufficient ocean acidification and warming to ruin the marine ecosystem component responsible for 2/3 of our oxygen, and new research suggests that GHGs may grow more impactful as the atmosphere warms meaning we could be on track for a mass extinction event around 2100. And we just elected a denialist.
|
# ¿ Nov 21, 2016 15:30 |
|
Funky See Funky Do posted:On the map there you can see 5 points of light in Australia - those are Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide. Can someone please explain to me the apparently undiscovered civilization in the middle of the Western Australian desert? Iirc, they rather equalized bright/dim sources (hence Alaska's North Slope and Australia's miscellany).
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2016 16:22 |
|
It's a mapping of light sources rather than an actual photo:quote:Unlike a camera that captures a picture in one exposure, the day-night band produces an image by repeatedly scanning a scene and resolving it as millions of individual pixels. Then, the day-night band reviews the amount of light in each pixel. If it is very bright, a low-gain mode prevents the pixel from oversaturating. If the pixel is very dark, the signal is amplified.
|
# ¿ Nov 22, 2016 17:13 |
|
Tell them global warming will cook the United States and send 50,000,000 Republicans screaming across the border. It will impel northward population migrations around the world, and I see no reason to exempt Canada. Edit: There's already talk of California building a pipeline to take Washington's water. When the entire United states needs water, who do you think we'll take it from? Accretionist fucked around with this message at 18:46 on Nov 22, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 22, 2016 18:44 |
|
Even if deftly handled, that's a set back. Another quote: quote:Kevin Trenberth, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research, said as Nasa provides the scientific community with new instruments and techniques, the elimination of Earth sciences would be “a major setback if not devastating”.
|
# ¿ Nov 23, 2016 13:36 |
|
Who could inherit NASA's work anyways?Nice piece of fish posted:Maybe you shouldn't have voted for Trump then. These are for generating av change revenue, and not for informational purposes. Accretionist fucked around with this message at 15:34 on Nov 23, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 23, 2016 15:12 |
|
Squalid posted:I listened to the Cliff Notes version on the Ted radio hour. The idea seems sound, and certainly land management today is real hosed up. Walking through supposedly good grazing land in California or the montane west can be real depressing, because so much of it is so badly damaged, and there seems to be so little done about it. However although I like the concept, the talk set off a few red flags, particularly when he mentions other managers have had trouble replicating his results. I don't know who is wrong and you'd probably have to look at the actual studies in question, but it seems like there's not universal acceptance of his theories. Feed the ruminants seaweed: quote:Professor of aquaculture at James Cook University in Townsville, Rocky De Nys, has been working with the CSIRO studying the effects seaweed can have on cow's methane production. Unfortunately, seaweed farming's difficult to industrialize.
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2016 08:35 |
|
AceOfFlames posted:I dont know how anyone can just keep living knowing that this is happening. Careers look useless to me, hope is a lie, I have almost no friends,never had an SO. I am literally hoping my heart stops or something so that my family doesnt destroy itself with grief over my death.I even tried therapy but just keep getting more "things will work out!" bullshit and all the therapists I tried are mothers so I always hold back on telling them how utterly hosed their children are. What do I do? It'll start getting bad when our generation starts dying. Don't buy a shorefront property and enjoy having been born right at the peak!
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2016 13:52 |
|
AceOfFlames posted:So I am just supposed to pretend nothing is happening? Form attachments to people who will die horribly or will have to protect? Make a career knowing that it will all turn to dust? I keep hearing about how you're supposed to love the process of what you do but I only ever manage to care about results. Why make something that will not last? Why strive for a brief moment of happiness if it comes with thousands more moments of pain? You sound depressed.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2016 15:49 |
|
TildeATH posted:No way. Tech is absolutely riddled with late learning coders making more money than makes any sense in the world. How'd you do it? Like, how'd you prepare and where'd you enter the field? Self-Train & Portfolio followed by web app developer or something?
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2016 06:44 |
|
Article: Bill Gates and investors worth $170 billion are launching a fund to fight climate change through energy innovationquote:Bill Gates is leading a more than $1 billion fund focused on fighting climate change by investing in clean energy innovation. Bill Gates is an exemplary billionaire.
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2016 07:35 |
|
AceOfFlames posted:So I ask again, how the hell can anyone do anything knowing this sort of thing and not want to immediately hang themselves? I've gotten to the point where everything sounds pointless and I can't convince my therapist to go beyond "Things will work out!"- Only resort is drugs but if civilization collapses those will go as well. I'm hoping every day that I die in a painless accident. You have the privilege of liveposting through the fall of Rome. Edit: Also, I'm pretty sure your despair over this is actually from depression. Like, watch this and see if you get any, "Oooooh, shiiiiiit," moments: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOAgplgTxfc Or just watch it out of general interest. It's very good! Accretionist fucked around with this message at 02:54 on Dec 19, 2016 |
# ¿ Dec 19, 2016 02:03 |
|
If any of you are experiencing Climate Change-related suicidal-ideation then you should probably stop following this thread.
|
# ¿ Dec 19, 2016 04:07 |
|
It's less realistic than serial killing. Edit: Good presentation below! Accretionist fucked around with this message at 15:34 on Dec 19, 2016 |
# ¿ Dec 19, 2016 14:47 |
|
Nice piece of fish posted:We're in actual real life likely to cause a runaway warming effect, shutting down the thermohaline cirulation of the oceans, suffer an anoxic ocean event that kills 99.99% of all life on the planet. Aren't there species of phytoplankton which don't rely on calcium carbonate shells? Those should be fine, right?
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2016 12:42 |
|
A Buttery Pastry posted:It's the future, none of it is real yet. That doesn't excuse posting Climate Change Fan Fiction.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2017 04:57 |
|
Shibawanko posted:Random terrified question: is it unthinkable that runaway global warming in fact goes so far off the rails that something might happen like has happened on Venus? Or is that not quite on the menu yet? I haven't seen anything to indicate this. If you're thinking of the arctic warming, that's in large part due to the polar vortex temporarily shifting into Russia. The Arctic's unseasonably warm and Russia's unseasonably cold but they're Russians so they're fine and that half of it's not news; it'll shift back. It's still a big deal because it's melting a lot of older, thicker sea ice. There's a lot of thin ice that forms thin melts every year. It's only weakly contributive to what Arctic sea-ice is supposed to be to: mitigating solar-warming of the ocean and contributing to convective currents in the North Atlantic. It takes a long time for the thicker sea-ice to form and we've been seeing less and less of it every year, and this unseasonable warmth dramatically accelerates the trend. (^^iirc)
|
# ¿ Jan 2, 2017 02:16 |
|
Trillions in costs. That's what some see in inaction. And that's what some see in action, in the form of all that unsold and unburnt coal, oil and natural gas. Trump's tapped a number of the latter. His admin could easily do worse than nothing.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2017 10:01 |
|
This year's going to own
|
# ¿ Jan 14, 2017 08:07 |
|
call to action posted:C'monnnnnn optimists! Tell us how we're gonna solve this! Liberation is inevitable. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ioFG999aOCs&t=60s (0:01:00 - 0:02:40) quote:Change–and everything is change; nothing can be held on to–to the degree that you go with a stream, you see, you are are still, you are flowing with it. But to the degree you resist the stream, then you notice that the current is rushing past you and fighting you. So swim with it, go with it, and you’re there. You’re at rest. And this is of course particularly true when it comes to those moments when life really seems to be going to take us away, and the stream of change is going to swallow us completely. The moment of death, and we think, ‘Oh-oh, this is it. This is the end.’ And so at death we withdraw, say ‘No, no, no, not that, not yet, please.’
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2017 22:41 |
|
At this point, it seems like we should agitate for Fortress Ameri-Canada. Sink the boats. Strafe the deserts. Accept no refugees. Export no food. Preparation > Mitigation We will be okay.
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2017 02:17 |
|
Arglebargle III posted:Honestly I have not heard a solution to climate change that is not the liberal internationalist solution that we see failing right now. Totalitarian asceticism?
|
# ¿ Mar 26, 2017 18:04 |
|
You know, data analysis to that effect would make a good satirical piece. Another angle might be obesity as both a carbon sink and a means of depopulation. Just have to get fat on carbon-friendly foods, of course.
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2017 19:39 |
|
Do rising sea levels help dilute acidification at all? Maybe we want this, goons
|
# ¿ Mar 28, 2017 16:14 |
|
Hmmm. 400 GtC → 4e+17 grams of carbon --(graphite: 2.266 g/cm3)→ ~1.77e+17 cm3 cubes of graphite → ~5.6 km3 of graphite That's approximately 70 of these 1.35 km cubes: http://i.imgur.com/VmpjUPc.mp4 The real question is this: How do we synthesize a 5.6 km* cube of graphite ??? I don't think there's any way back for us. Accretionist fucked around with this message at 00:08 on Apr 1, 2017 |
# ¿ Apr 1, 2017 00:04 |
|
My understanding is that yes.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2017 00:33 |
|
It's my understanding that 2050-ish is when significant disruption will commence. We'll all be dead or dying. It's our kids who are hosed. We're the 'Baby Boomers' of Climate Change. Us lucky ducks got right in before the fall and we have the privilege of watching the Fall of Rome from the comfort of our unsustainable homes. Do you think they'll come up with a new term for this based around the damage? Right now, it's abstract. 'Climate Change.' The climate is changing. That's the crisis. In the future, the environment will work against where we keep our stuff and how we do our business. A new term about the environmental-civilizational disjunction would be more appropriate when 'climate change' has progressed to a phenomena of pressing and immediate economic damage, cultural damage, political damage, civil unrest, civil wars and interstate warfare.
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2017 02:58 |
|
Ooh, that's true. I was passively taking the perspective of the average resident of a G8 nation. Off the top of my head, Miami is experiencing significant difficulties. Now, Miami can afford to spend millions raising streets and running enormous sump pumps 24/7 but people in the rest of the world are already suffering increased violence, food/water shortages, dislocation and economic tumult. Like much of life, it's way less of a problem if you're rich.
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2017 03:13 |
|
Ever read up on the Free State Project? It's a constant push for Libertarians to move to NH so they can reach a critical mass and commandeer the state's politics. Thousands have moved and they've gotten people elected. I want a left-wing version. Just get everyone in the country who wants state-level UHC, Norwegian-style prisons, etc. to move to one place and get it done.
|
# ¿ Apr 5, 2017 20:25 |
|
Article: Climate change is literally turning the Arctic ocean inside out From: Washington Post Date: April 6, 2017 quote:There’s something special — and very counterintuitive — about the Arctic Ocean.
|
# ¿ Apr 8, 2017 19:55 |
|
I should start growing and burying bamboo.
|
# ¿ Apr 11, 2017 01:00 |
|
Any conference talk recommendations about strategy and planning around the implications of climate change, especially worst-case outcomes? Talks about Iceland looking to capitalize on Arctic shipping, geostrategic implications of global food/water shortages, etc.
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2017 04:07 |
|
I'm looking forward to this year's minimum. Climate Change: The Greatest Show on Earth
|
# ¿ Apr 16, 2017 07:36 |
|
enraged_camel posted:Floridans are starting to freak out. Half that article's bold worthy. I liked this bit: quote:“The next black swan is the failure of housing finance to take climate change into account,” he said. “There will be a large number of homes that will lose substantial value, and will default on mortgages, if nothing is done to help them.”
|
# ¿ Apr 20, 2017 23:32 |
|
I wonder how much Florida real estate could by hurt internet propaganda? Probably a lot of people who'd like to know that house they're eyeing will be underwater by 2060 Edit: The article addressed this: quote:Russo says if she knew in 2015 what she knows now, she wouldn’t have purchased the house. People buying in her neighborhood today are probably just as clueless as she once was, she guesses. “I would bet money that the realtors are not telling them.” Internet bullshit's easier than legislation. And if you get the ball rolling on Facebook, the politics get easier. Accretionist fucked around with this message at 00:03 on Apr 21, 2017 |
# ¿ Apr 20, 2017 23:56 |
|
Rime posted:loving LOL if you think a few thousand people marching along a predetermined route vetted by the local municipality and police forces is ever going to invoke meaningful change in modern society. Go ask a Venezuelan how weeks of mass peaceful demonstration is working out for them, when they are actually starving as their country collapses around them. Marches are good for recruitment, agitation, organization building and so on Did someone argue that marches are, "one weird trick to create Utopia (oligarchs hate it!)," or something?
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2017 17:14 |
|
Low-impact activity can help develop and mask high-impact activity. Additionally, it impacts culture and perceptions. It's useful in relation to a wide range of assumed climate change outcomes. Don't hate, peace
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2017 22:08 |
|
|
# ¿ May 14, 2024 19:33 |
|
I'll give that a try. We are all connected with nature. We are a part of it and it is a part of us. But Republicans are like, "Mmm, I am connected to my things and my money. My money is a part of me, mmmm."
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2017 03:30 |