|
Doopliss posted:There were some extremely binding, fast multinational instruments in dealing with the ozone layer, with economic well-being taking a distant back seat. Granted our dependence on ozone-depleting emissions was way lower than our dependence on GHG emissions, but it was wholly possible for us to be doing better than we are. We're just not. "Our dependence was way lower" is kind of understating it. Getting rid of CFCs was an inconvenience. Getting rid of hydrocarbons means we give up our way of life and have to find a new one. I'm still expecting us to mostly do nothing until civilization hits a brick wall and billions die. 
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2015 16:14
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 6, 2024 17:08 |
|
|
pathetic little tramp posted:The National Review continues their slide into obscurity: They're not even trying anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2015 16:22
|
|
