|
Hey guys wait for me I'm in too
|
# ¿ Nov 18, 2015 00:10 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 17:03 |
|
elgarbo posted:What does print ready mean? ExecuDork posted:So I am unfamiliar with the level of importance granted by a body of work being curated by a single individual, absent any professional or institutional affiliation. If I'm accidentally implying that SA is comparable to a museum, I apologize, but I think this website is at least as significant a thread going through this project as anything else.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2015 00:39 |
|
McMadCow posted:I would absolutely love to curate/edit a future issue.
|
# ¿ Nov 20, 2015 02:36 |
|
Mido posted:hosed up submissions go to the "bart radfucker" zine which will only be printed so they can be filmed being thrown into a dumpster and burned Cool, maybe we can get an update on Professor Dahlia.
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 01:34 |
|
McMadCow posted:Thanks for the update! Two of the shots I submitted were digital photos of prints, and in the interim I got them large-format scanned. The new files should be a lot more appropriate for publication.
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 00:03 |
|
rear end photo with QR code linking to rear end photo. Fake comedy option is digital rear end photo should also have QR code, for infinite rear end.
|
# ¿ Dec 23, 2015 02:49 |
|
elgarbo posted:Generally, shots are justified to the top of the page, centered with the bleed area as a border. Obviously that means portrait oriented shots get more page real estate but there's not much that can be done to solve that (other than crossing the fold, but then there wouldn't be space for two photos.) Obviously, I am open to any other suggestions that might solve this problem that I'm missing, but I've been poring over photobooks to get layout ideas and this is what I've found most palatable so far.
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2015 12:28 |
|
alkanphel posted:While that would be consistent, I kinda feel that's just probably going to end up wasting space on paper. I'd probably go with the solution of rotating landscape shots to turn them into "portrait" orientation, maximizing the space. And although I do think it could possible be jarring, ultimately this isn't a sequenced photobook but a showcase of separate works so the continuity in that sense doesn't really matter so much IMO. But I guess the final choice should be Elgarbo's, since he's the one doing all the hard work. I've seen books where turning works very well, amongst other devices that remind the viewer that he/she is looking at a book. In this instance, it's unlikely to work, and would merely serve to change the relationship between the selected pairs.
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2015 20:58 |
|
Putrid Grin posted:I have been thinking about doing this in some of my books, but I haven't figured out how to make it work well. Mind dropping some titles where I could get some ideas of how to go about it? Chris Killip's In flagrante also requires the viewer physically manipulate the book to reveal a clear image, through use of shiny paper prone to glare. elgarbo posted:Definitely not going to be able to please everyone in this regard. I'll keep tinkering with it, though.
|
# ¿ Dec 25, 2015 23:13 |
|
Good stuff, looking forward to all those untitled photographs.
|
# ¿ Jan 28, 2016 17:26 |
|
rohan posted:(No drunk, belligerent video on the Kickstarter? For shame.)
|
# ¿ Jan 31, 2016 22:29 |
|
nielsm posted:By the way, for all the international shipments, remember to do the customs declaration right.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 10:02 |
|
bobmarleysghost posted:Rest of the money should be used to open up the official Dorkroom gallery in whatever city it's cheap enough to buy such a space in
|
# ¿ Apr 12, 2016 20:30 |
|
Received mine yesterday. Good to see the mix of work in there! My copy has some lattice pattern indentations to about a fifth of the pages from the front. No damage to the cover and the affected pages are printed perfectly, so it looks like someone stacked something on top of them after printing before binding. It's ruined my faith in goon projects.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2016 17:35 |
|
elgarbo posted:Hey dude, no idea what happened there but I'll shoot you out a replacement if you like. Let me know.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2016 22:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 17:03 |
|
Received today. Looks great. Thanks.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2016 19:16 |