|
Gensuki posted:Does anyone have the Magic version of loss.jpg handy? asking for a friend. This one?
|
# ¿ Dec 9, 2015 05:09 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 12:49 |
|
Lieutenant Centaur posted:Please for the love of god let there be a Price of Progress reprint in Oath. Ahahahahaha, this is adorable.
|
# ¿ Dec 10, 2015 19:24 |
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:It also hates Devoid! Don't forget that the colorless mechanic and the colorless mechanic don't work well together. Which by extension gets Processors as all ingesters are devoid cards and nothing in true colorless below 7 mana exiles. {c}-cards are gonna have to do a lot of work to get over being bad with colorless cards. Converge is just part of it; Kozilek's Chaneller and Hedron Archive and Pilgrim's Eye are the only spells in BFZ that cost less than 6 mama and don't oppose colorless-only, because the rest are colored or punish colorless. Has anything been said about C only paying for C costs and not being usable for generic costs? Because if not, you're overreacting.
|
# ¿ Dec 11, 2015 23:43 |
|
odiv posted:So colourless is not "mana of any colour", right? Like BoP can't tap for it, I'm guessing?
|
# ¿ Dec 12, 2015 09:13 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:Oath of the Gatewatch is the story of four planeswalkers - one green, one red, one blue, and one white making an Oath to fight the Eldrazi or some poo poo. There's no black planeswalker in the Oath. They put Oath of Ghouls on the Reserve List?! WHY?!
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 00:05 |
|
Japanese reader confirming that the demon makes you lose four.
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 04:33 |
|
Gensuki posted:Why is Wasteland 10 times the cost of stripmine? Is stripmine banned in everything? Strip Mine is banned in everything and restricted in Vintage. Wasteland is a 4 of in most Legacy decks.
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 04:34 |
|
Spitballing for a Magic-y word: Escalate?
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2015 20:09 |
|
suicidesteve posted:Right, but WUBRG are also C in most situations. No, WUBRG can be used to pay for generic. That confusion is precisely why they gave C a symbol.
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2015 00:02 |
|
Lancelot posted:hm, what argument shall I use to convince my largely millennial audience that spoilers are bad... hm... i know...let's go with the argument old people in the recording industry used against napster! wow.. another hard day's work done at wotc Don't forget that the movie industry is still using that argument.
|
# ¿ Dec 16, 2015 18:42 |
|
Zoness posted:I mean when they showed wrath of god turning into damnation that was dope as gently caress I actually knew a guy who said with a straight face "Have you seen the new 10th Ed Wrath of God art? It's just a white version of Damnation."
|
# ¿ Dec 17, 2015 00:27 |
|
Elyv posted:hi guys would you like to see what twoo has been up to, because apparently it's videos like this Did he actually unironically say "wake up sheeple" without actually using that phrase? Good god.
|
# ¿ Dec 27, 2015 19:24 |
|
AgentSythe posted:It might have a home in that Esper Familiar pauper deck It seems just worse than Islands and bouncelands to me.
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2015 22:31 |
|
Well yeah, why else would Star City print a Germ token? It's not like any other card in Magic generates Germ tokens.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 00:51 |
|
Bugsy posted:
I'm guessing that it's actually "i(t)s coherently incoherent"
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 17:28 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:It only triggers if the second colorless creature enters under your control. I can't even read Spanish and I was still able to find "enters the battlefield" in that textbox. (Okay fine I can read some French and that help, but still)
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 17:41 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I know the clause is there, I just want to know why the English translation words it so badly. The spanish text of that clause is "entre al campo de batalla" -- literally "enters to the battlefield", obviously best translated as "enters the battlefield". Then why does the given English translation say "enter in battlefield"? It's not like the spanish text says "entre en". Oh, fair enough. I'd say it's probably due to good old fashioned incompetence, the same reason it says "P&T from that creature."
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 17:51 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:unacceptable I'm really glad I don't get this mad (ironically or not) over how bad most Japanese to English translations are.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 18:31 |
|
Lottery of Babylon posted:I like -1/-1 counters. I loving loved Incremental Blight.
|
# ¿ Dec 30, 2015 01:24 |
|
I opened a couple of Garruks in Lowryn limited, but I think that's it.
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2015 18:06 |
|
Dehtraen posted:Card Kingdom did another Pauper tournament today, sold out at pre-registration but then a handful of people no showed. Went 4-1-1 in Swiss (non-intentional draw) playing elves and lost in the semifinals. Fun times. I wish more places would do paper pauper tournaments I was working just up the street. I'm definitely going to keep an eye out for the next one and request that day off well in advance.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 19:17 |
|
rabidsquid posted:High Tide is not so strong since Frantic Search is banned. Snap and Cloud of Faeries are not and the High Tide decks were busted enough at Card Kingdom's first Pauper tournament that they decided it needed to be banned for the second.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 20:50 |
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:There is a cloud deck, but I thought the issue was that the combo takes an insane amount of time to play out online. Could be a good one in paper. I think it's less than it takes time and more that it's monotonous. You have to click through every iteration of Ghostly Flicker/Cloud of Faeries/Mnemonic Wall.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 21:03 |
|
UG Madness is also (mostly) legal and I'm kind of interested to see how strong it is.
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 21:41 |
|
rabidsquid posted:I actually don't think it would be all that strong but you could play two of my favorite cards, Waterfront Bouncer and Piracy Charm, so I say you should saddle up those Arrogant Wurms Fingers McLongDong posted:Wild mongrel best mongrel They also made Circular Logic into a common!
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 23:18 |
|
suicidesteve posted:The real answer is to ban Cloud of Faeries because that card is obnoxious as crap and allows that stupid Familiar deck, as well as Delver having 4 power worthof flyers and still leave up Spellstutter Sprite on turn 2. I'm interested, but is MTGO still a steaming pile? And do accounts still cost $10?
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2016 00:51 |
|
Skyl3lazer posted:If this translation is correct, wowzers. As a Japanese speaker, can confirm translation is accurate.
|
# ¿ Jan 4, 2016 06:17 |
|
Frontier Siege costs 4.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2016 01:08 |
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Hence the turn 2 mana dork. Yeah, okay. I assumed you meant "random creature."
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2016 01:11 |
|
Terrible Horse posted:Cant wait for Gatewatch: Civil War That's the Avengers.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2016 01:26 |
|
Finally, a UR card I'm actually excited about for my Cube. It's no Wee Dragonauts or Nivix Cyclops, but it's still pretty strong. The Baloth is also great.
|
# ¿ Jan 5, 2016 10:06 |
|
Angry Grimace posted:"So, uh, Jace, I heard you're heading to Innistrad." Holy poo poo, this is great.
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2016 01:11 |
|
Yeah, the fact that Jace could somehow block out Kozilek's reality warping powers is bullshit. Stop shoving Jace down our thoats, WoTC.
|
# ¿ Jan 6, 2016 01:18 |
|
superstepa posted:Is MTGO worth it for pauper? No stores here play paper pauper and I really want to play a competitive format but right now I can't afford a legit modern or legacy deck. You have to pay to participate in MTGO pauper tournaments right? I'm also interested in the answer to this.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 02:41 |
|
It turns out when you have a product that literally prints money, you don't have to invest money into improving it. For all the problems MTGO has had and may or may not still have, it still lets people draft whenever they want and people will pay for that.
|
# ¿ Jan 7, 2016 23:56 |
|
Is Phyrexian Tower even played in anything anywhere?
|
# ¿ Jan 9, 2016 22:05 |
|
It's hilarious that Nourishing Shoal is actually seeing play now, since it was so reviled back in Standard.
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2016 19:37 |
|
Sickening posted:Its like the cedric phillips thing where he rules lawyered an esper charm. technically correct and douchebagery all at the same time. I don't think I've heard this story.
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 02:49 |
|
Does one copy in the sideboard really count?
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 21:52 |
|
|
# ¿ May 13, 2024 12:49 |
|
little munchkin posted:Clearly it was the quarterback's intention to throw the ball to his teammate. Everyone on both teams knew it too, so intercepting the ball and running the other way with it is such a scumbag move. Really?
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 23:40 |