|
According to Maro, playtesting has shown that a) people really did not figure it out and b) people don't read reminder text if they think they know how a rule goes.
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 14:03
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 04:19 |
|
|
Fling with flashback.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 13, 2017 20:54
|
|
|
the Orb of Zot posted:Sadly, no. There's no way to get 3 mana on turn 2 in this standard, because WOTC are cowards. T3: Plains, tap creatures for a white, Gideon, emblem.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 07:55
|
|
|
An opening hand of two lands, four ornithopters and an echantment sounds like feelbads.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 08:26
|
|
|
I didn't spot anyone posting this so: Disposses 2B Sorcery Name an artifact card. Search target player's graveyard, hand, and library for any number of cards with that name and exile them. Then that player shuffles his or her library.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 10:50
|
|
|
Well they keep inviting Wizards employees.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 14:14
|
|
|
You could probably make something neat with Lili the Last Hope and Wayward Servant.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 15:09
|
|
|
I can only see yesterday's gallery?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 15:50
|
|
|
 Battle buddies! 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 15:57
|
|
|
 Oh hey the last land was Wilds. That's fixing, I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 16:29
|
|
|
Barry Shitpeas posted:you might not care but others do
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 16:35
|
|
|
Firebatgyro posted:Drafting a U/B/x cycling deck is going to be sweet
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 16:40
|
|
|
Is Aristocrats a deck in modern?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 16:46
|
|
|
C-Euro posted:I posted an Aristocrats list in the Eternal thread (that I cribbed from MTGGoldfish) but I haven't actually been able to play it yet. No idea if it's good or not but it was fairly cheap.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 16:54
|
|
|
Rap Record Hoarder posted:This looks nuts, Morbid buzzard is a house, limited should be fun. Hopefully an inexpensive r/b or b/w aggro deck shakes out for Standard, seems like there's enough stuff here to pick from to open up some new viable decks. Then everyone complains a lot, moves over to Modern and the same thing happens with Death's Shadow.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 17:04
|
|
|
It should be "as silently as".
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 17:55
|
|
|
Just lol if you never bother to consider what "eternal youth" actually includes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 19:25
|
|
|
I like LRR, Graham can make opening mail look interesting. 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 20:20
|
|
|
Soul Glo posted:Kathleen's account spotted.  My favourite's actually Serge. He's a terrible player but his attitude is just too infectious.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2017 22:21
|
|
|
So if you discard Fiery Temper and cast it for R, does the Fiery Temper become a "discarded card"?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 15, 2017 18:47
|
|
|
Because I'm a stupid moron, I read Robert B. Wintermute's The Quest for Karn, which was the Scars of Mirrodin block novel. Here's a short review: It's really loving bad.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 14:07
|
|
|
That's the thing: They were already posting it on the website back in 2011. They just picked a random part of the story and published it in a book, without introducing any characters or setting up the plot in any way. And if you want to know what happens after Karn gets healed, you have to go dig up an Uncharted Realms article. (Spoilers: Mirrodin is hosed anyway.) It's no wonder these things didn't sell.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 14:44
|
|
|
You're conflating the rules for continuous effects and Auras as objects. An aura attached to an illegal target is put into the graveyard as a state-based action because them's the rules – just like a Creature dies if its Toughness falls to 0. Pedantry aside, why a continuous effect created by a spell or an ability only checks once while one created by a static ability (such as an Aura, I guess) checks continuously, yeaaaah I dunno. I guess it's easier to play? "Target Zombie gets +1/+1 until end of turn" would be a pain in the rear end if you had to keep checking its zombieness until end of turn, right? Conversely, "all Zombies get +1/+1" would be a pain in the rear end if you had to remember which of your dudes were zombies when the Lord came on board.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 21:43
|
|
|
That's some soft rock.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 23:56
|
|
|
ShadeofBlue posted:Of course, against a deck with a ton of targets, Fragmentize becomes less narrow, and more of a card that you are actually happy playing with, rather than a necessary evil. I'm pretty sure Mardu vehicles doesn't play many (or any?) other targets that Fragmentize actually deals with, permanently, though. How do you feel about the new card Dispossess? It exiles all Hearts not already on the battlefield, but it costs 2B.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 08:48
|
|
|
Well when you put it that way.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 08:55
|
|
|
They... Haven't had any rights to Star Wars games since 2012, though?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 15:34
|
|
|
mcmagic posted:I think the major problem with standard is going back to the old, longer rotations.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 16:10
|
|
|
Death Bot posted:Maro likes to talk about Garfield saying that if rarity stopped being a useful balance mechanic then they'd already become a massive success, fails to mention that they never fixed that problem and definitely expect ppl to spend more than 20-50 and stop
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 16:59
|
|
|
Knowing I'd be facing endless Value Copters would make me think twice about getting into Standard, to be honest. I mean I don't have that kind of money anyway, but in theory.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 17:44
|
|
|
Jabor posted:I wonder if you could do a points system (similar to australian highlander in concept) except it's a flat 1 point for uncommons, 4 points for rares, 8 points for mythics, and you get like 40 points all-up for your deck.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2017 18:06
|
|
|
If they make Vampires, Knights or Cats, I might end up buying a deck. shudder
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 18:30
|
|
|
SoftNum posted:Magic: The Gathering - I CAST MOUTH
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 20:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 04:19 |
|
|
BJPaskoff posted:https://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3817553 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 20:54
|
|