|
BFZ was already tied with Kamigawa for how insular it was. They are going for the record with OTG.
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 17:55
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 01:44 |
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:(This card is fake.) This got me thinking that having a real keyword meaning "This card is fake" on real cards would be hilarious.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 18:11
|
|
|
Irony Be My Shield posted:Mythic rares would probably be a good candidate for that same treatment. Although I maintain that if the symbol for colorless mana in general is being changed to ♦ (as opposed to (1), which means "any kind of mana") there is no need to put reminder text on any individual card, they'd just have to convey that rules change on a wider level. I can see having a ♦ cost on cards to represent that it must be paid with colorless mana, but why have lands make ♦ when (1) is the same thing?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 18:28
|
|
|
stinkles1112 posted:This seems like strong evidence for them being real Mods on mtgsalvation have confirmed that they are real.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 19:07
|
|
|
TheKingofSprings posted:Via what? Inside the threads. A usual source confirmed them. They are in the spoiler also. The dropdown for OTG says 0, but if you actually click on it, the three spoiled cards will be there.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 18, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
Rinkles posted:BFZ finally hit Duels today (Steam only). I love how they decided to make different products for each platform instead of having one backend with differing UIs. It's adorable.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2015 21:28
|
|
|
Fiend Computer posted:New card got spoiled today. I like that they made a card where the type of sleeve you play can actually matter.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2015 20:06
|
|
|
Does anybody else think that Sphinx of the Last Word is bullshit? I mean, at least have it die to languish.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2015 04:00
|
|
|
Niton posted:Presenting the first english spoiler of the Shadows of Innistrad spoiler season: Gravetusk. I can see it.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 15, 2015 08:35
|
|
|
Oath Nissa is not impressive at first look, but she costs only costs 3, makes a chump to protect her, and puts counters on things. She is going to be so annoying to play against.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 16, 2015 02:39
|
|
|
AgentSythe posted:it's mystic snake and it's not close I'm pretty sure you're right. Hard counter with a gently caress you chump blocker for 4.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 2, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
Pyronic posted:Has anyone solved the cryptolith puzzle on the prerelease posters yet? Is there more to this puzzle or is the entire puzzle four fork things?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2016 01:59
|
|
|
I'm making a deck around that legendary toad no matter how good or bad it is.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2016 21:15
|
|
|
Pilots creature type that makes vehicles they crew better! This set is going to be fun.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2016 21:47
|
|
|
I have a question about the reminder text on vehicles. It currently reads: Tap any number of creatures you control with total power 1 or more: This Vehicle becomes an artifact creature until end of turn. But should it be: Tap any number of untapped creatures you control with total power 1 or more: This Vehicle becomes an artifact creature until end of turn. Is there a change in the rules? I always thought that you could tap an already tapped creature and that's why most costs that involve tapping a creature explicitly say that you must tap an untapped creature.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 2, 2016 21:50
|
|
|
I predict that the gremlins will have a lovely vehicle that is a wheelbarrow.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 3, 2016 03:01
|
|
|
whydirt posted:Vehicles are basically equipment that set the creature's power, toughness, and abilities to a set level instead of building on the existing creature. It trades the ability to be used on defense with an effective equip cost of 0, assuming you meet the power threshold. Yeah. For certain decks, vehicles will kick rear end. Your wimpy utility creatures are now attacking while still hanging back to safeguard their utility.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 3, 2016 03:03
|
|
|
I just wanted everyone to know that I just lost a game because someone Deflecting Palmed my Deflecting Palm, which I played in response to his other Deflecting Palm, which he played in response to my first Deflecting Palm. I don't know the exact ruleness of which Deflecting Palm to target, but whatever it was, my opponent got it right.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2016 03:12
|
|
|
Orange Fluffy Sheep posted:Deflecting Palm is a source of damage and an ABAB pattern would work out that way. This is what I thought and I'm pretty sure what happened. I targeted the latest both times. Alaan posted:Should be the last one your opponent played but good loving luck on MTGO. It did work out that way. I was mostly posting because I was so surprised to see someone else on MTGO actually playing a fun deck. I think 4 DP in one turn is ridiculous even in casual, but to play against someone playing stupid decks for fun on MTGO is a hard find. So my original post was half rules question and part "Can you believe". The Human Crouton fucked around with this message at 03:48 on Sep 9, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2016 03:45
|
|
|
ShaneB posted:The stack is extremely clear on magic online. If you targeted something that was lower on the stack I don't know what to tell you. I didn't. I always targeted the latest. Turns out I did it right, according to the other replies. It was just funny that there were 4 Delecting Palms in one play. Also, I was wondering if I could have played the stack better, but again the thread tells me that I did all I could have done.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 9, 2016 04:00
|
|
|
Wizards needs to have a partial foiling process. Those cards would be look awesome with the borders, name box, type box, and power/toughness foiled; but the artwork and text box left alone.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 12, 2016 16:19
|
|
|
Sickening posted:Its the stores I am worried about, not the customers. I think it's getting to the point where you have to buy a sealed box or nothing.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 13, 2016 02:20
|
|
|
Skywhales!
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 00:21
|
|
|
I realize that 7E might be confused as either 7 or 8 energy counters, but couldn't they have just done EEEEEEE(7)?
|
|
#
¿
Sep 14, 2016 03:26
|
|
|
I like it because opponent selective discard needs to be worse. An opening hand is a pretty fragile thing, and getting Inquisition of Kozileked or Thoughtseized on turn one just isn't good for the game.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 16, 2016 16:04
|
|
|
Retromancer posted:Man, watching the top 8 of SCG Orlando made me wish for Modern to die and be replaced by holo-extended already. i mostly agree with this except I'd like them to exclude the Khans block, and start with Origins instead because I hate fetchlands.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 19, 2016 05:28
|
|
|
Alaan posted:Nope. Next Friday. Never had need or want for a playmat until this post.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2016 01:20
|
|
|
Retromancer posted:A guy I played against yesterday had this as his playmat. If he knew it was awkward then that guy is awesome. If he actually thought it was sexy, then that's a different story.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 26, 2016 04:26
|
|
|
mcmagic serves a useful purpose because every time I actually consider going to my local game store, I read his posts and remind myself that I would be spending my Friday night in a room containing at least two of him.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 28, 2016 15:02
|
|
|
I'm a man who can find the good in, and sometimes actually like, DesolatorMagic. And I hate Alpha Investments.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 2, 2016 07:48
|
|
|
Elyv posted:news from our dear leaders at wotc: quote:Dreams of delivering deep gameplay experiences in Magic worlds and fiction on diverse gaming platforms and genres. This sounds like a something from an email from a Nigerian prince.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
Hellsau posted:I read this, closed the tab, and then thought, 'why did I close that? I didn't even read all of it.' I opened the link again and no, I read all of it, there just wasn't much of anything there. Thank you kindly for your reading of magic digital next. We hope our ambitions will soar to the newest heights.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2017 19:10
|
|
|
Ersatz posted:So, I'm getting back into Magic after a 10 year hiatus. What were they thinking when they stopped printing core sets? Standard without them seems kind of bizarre. Don't get used to anything they do or don't do. They change everything every other year. There is no consistency anymore.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2017 05:17
|
|
|
I still hate that they got rid of the pre-constructed decks after Eventide. I used to be able to get people into the game by giving someone a 60 card deck to play with right out of the box. A nice, compact, ready to play set of 60 cards that were all form the same set and came in a deck box. Then they made the precons into 40 card decks that had boosters come with them. They didn't even have a box. They just give you some loose cards. How is that supposed to be a good early purchase for a new hobby? They wanted to give you less than a real deck to teach you to buy boosters, but the product was so lovely that it would make a new player not care enough to continue. And why is including a booster a good thing anyway? They think exposing a new player to the experience of opening a 25 cent rare before they even know if they like the game is a good idea? I don't even know what the current iteration of the precon is now, but I'm sure it's nonsensical. Such a great game. Such a bad company behind it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 18, 2017 08:13
|
|
|
ManMythLegend posted:This guy looks rad as hell. I'm getting a sacrifice an artifact get a power increase vibe.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 02:11
|
|
|
I just logged onto MTGO for the first time in months. Is there a reason I can't find Kaladesh/Aether drafts? I see plenty of SOI drafts still.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 05:14
|
|
|
odiv posted:It's leagues now. Chat told me that. Is it really leagues with no queue? I can only play a scheduled match? Also, thanks for answering. I trust their help only far enough to confirm that something can't happen, but not how to actually play a game the way I want to.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 05:26
|
|
|
Soul Glo posted:Yeah, it's way better now, no waiting for rounds I'm being very serious when I ask if this is sarcasm. I only see options to play on 1/25/2017, which is in the past. Or I can spend $30 to play a tournament.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 05:28
|
|
|
Jabor posted:Leagues are not dailies, you start drafting as soon as 8 people show up and then you do the deckbuilding and games whenever you want instead of having to block out three hours at once. Make sure you're clicking the right tab in the play screen. Ok. Starting to make sense. Thanks to all of you who answered me.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 05:32
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 01:44 |
|
|
Soul Glo posted:You aren't looking at the right filter My filter options are: Planewalkers Just Starting Out Standard Just For Fun Commander Just For Fun Free For All Standard Tournament Practice None of these meet my requirement of paying event tickets and playing a draft.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2017 05:34
|
|