|
Jarmak posted:Again, I specifically addressed this argument already and you haven't done anything but repeat it without adding anything new, but sure lets try this again: If this is what you were trying to say, then maybe you spent too much time getting choked in the military. Because this is not what people are up in arms about. This is exactly why people get up your rear end and exactly what you were criticized of before, that you will focus on diversionary poo poo that distracts from the main issue. The point is not "he was violating departmental policy", but "his loving chokehold (which also happened to be against department policy) killed a dude completely unnecessarily. The policy thing is not the important thing, which is why you're focusing on it. Again. As in: Jarmak posted:I understand that people's reaction to this is that if it breaks policy how can it be a legal/official/legitimate application of force so it must be a crime, but it doesn't work that way. No, people are saying it's not a legitimate application of force because, in addition to being against department policy, it killed a dude completely unnecessarily. Jarmak posted:In order to punish someone criminally the conduct has to be not part of the job of a police officer according to the criminal codes of the state of New York. So Jarmak, answer this. Should he have been killed via cop? It's a simple yes or no question. The Mattybee fucked around with this message at 18:14 on Dec 1, 2015 |
#
¿
Dec 1, 2015 18:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 15, 2024 02:49 |
|