|
CommieGIR posted:"I vote republican despite the fact that they directly work against my interests because GUNS" - TFR are you supposed to be a representative of the guys looking out for their interests, here cause I think I see a problem with your scenario
|
# ¿ Dec 2, 2015 23:30 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 22:05 |
|
the psychotic internet wierdos who can't stop screeching their hatred for Americans even as they attempt a cursory pretense of caring are the ones really looking out for your best interests, and you'd know that and do what they say if you weren't such a fat regressive uneducated murderous white capitalist nazi redneck
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 00:54 |
|
Dead Reckoning posted:Yeah, I'm not really cool with government agents popping into private citizens' homes without any sort of individual suspicion in order to make sure they're following the law. Which, FYI, is not a thing the EPA does. it's a thing the ATF does with certain kinds of license holders, but it's more a pointless minor bureaucratic hassle and less stormtroopers kicking in the doors and burning the house down to punish them all for being Probable Republicans so it's understandable that some folks ITT would feel that shouldn't even count. A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 09:30 on Dec 3, 2015 |
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 09:28 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Well first of all I don't want confiscation, I like taking my guns to the range, I just think like any dangerous hobby our funtimes should be better regulated. Keep your gunsafe in your garage or your toolshed or your gun in your gunowner's condo building with community locking gunracks next to the lobby or at your range if you don't want inspectors in your living room. It's not like you have to keep your guns in the same room as your illegal casino/porn studio/drug dealership/whatever. yeah that guy sucks, the guy who said the thing you quoted. I'm glad you took him down a peg or two, since nobody else was brave enough to.
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 11:11 |
|
itt let's speculate about what those subhuman homonculus ffffffucking conservatives would, like, totally say, if they were talking to me which they're not since I got disinvited from Thanksgiving dinner
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 11:13 |
|
Effectronica posted:Weren't you pissing up a storm about "lovely sarcasm" earlier? Blatant hypocrisy seems to be regrettably common on this issue. People will stake out an absolutist position on access to guns being essential for self-defense and then say it's okay to ban felons and "mentally unwell" people from having them. People will declare that being pro on gun control is solely because of culture warring, while being anti is inherently reasonable as a position. People will talk up their desire to have guns for self-defense, but although this requires a willingness to kill, they curiously rage about the supposed genocidal desires of pro-control people. you're the Elliot Rodger failson who's been spewing out death threats nonstop and there's 'people' somewhere who say the President is a lizard from outer space, if you need to come up with an imaginary friend with worse ideas than yours to be airily dismissive of it is time for you to face the brutal truth that you are the dumbest actual person you can find and start desperately agreeing with anyone you hear
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 16:41 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:I can't believe how much bullshit you two are generating over not knowing how a food safety compliance inspection works... you're really dumb and angry and upping the angry isn't doing anything to make you sound less dumb
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 23:46 |
|
nah I'm good wanna keep presentable in case the county health inspector comes rappelling through my bedroom window
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 23:53 |
|
Effectronica posted:Okay, now switch sides and argue for that guy's position. i hope you're not still trying to suggest that everyone doing this could make this thread worse
|
# ¿ Dec 3, 2015 23:59 |
|
the future of gun control is that in 2040 sentient guns will be granted the vote and immediately become America's political majority
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2015 09:50 |
|
Laverna posted:I've never actually cared enough to look it up but the Amendments are basically changes people made to the original Constitution, right? The Bill of Rights (first 10 amendments) came in as the constitution was being drafted and were ratified almost immediately thereafter, there've been twentysome in total since then but they are by design extremely hard to pass, unlikely to happen a second time over bored bougies' moral panic of the week (it's been done), and more or less call for a plurality consensus among the country as a whole, where currently the consensus outside forums of sulky Che-shirted teens swings so strongly the other way that the gun control people can't even push federal laws through that would be technically constitutional even with the amendment. Their barrier isn't that danged dirty old Constitution, it's that nobody wants what they're selling. A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 22:46 on Dec 6, 2015 |
# ¿ Dec 6, 2015 22:31 |
|
VitalSigns posted:Actually an outright majority of Americans favor stricter gun control, and even Republicans are evenly split on the issue with pro-gun control gaining. The Republican-controlled senate is as usual ignoring the will of the people in favor of giving a sloppy blowjob to the gun manufacturer lobby I was sorta wondering how the entire liberal establishment simultaneously did a 180 from the no-fly list being insane authoritarian garbage to being common sense that should be applied to civil rights but if y'all can look at a shaky 5% polling lead in 'more laws good?' and see a popular mandate to rewrite the Constitution being subverted by the scheming NRA Elders of Zion I guess that answers that.
|
# ¿ Dec 7, 2015 09:10 |
|
The NRA manages five million members while yelling about Flash games and the Brady Campaign is writing manifestoes out of a shack in the woods because of a sinister Rethuglikkkan lizardperson mind control plot to make the extra 5% of people who grunt one way in a vague low-info phone poll and reverse themselves when you go into specifics not actually give a poo poo beyond when you put em on the spot for a "should laws be more strict y/n".
A Wizard of Goatse fucked around with this message at 10:05 on Dec 7, 2015 |
# ¿ Dec 7, 2015 09:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 17, 2024 22:05 |
|
Effectronica posted:So how often do you jack it to the scenes from Yes, Minister about manipulating polls? i constantly jack it to everything so I'm not sure how that's relevant
|
# ¿ Dec 8, 2015 06:12 |