|
Love Stole the Day posted:WELP "we banned over 500 hackers"
|
#
¿
Mar 11, 2016 08:58
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 05:13 |
|
|
Krinkle posted:Advanced radar decay was the worst 6mil I ever spent. Everyone has radar deprivation. Who cares. Ugh. Just to be clear, it still works. I forget the exact numbers, but let's say regular lock-on decay is 5 seconds. Deprivation deducts 5 seconds, while target retention adds 2.5 seconds. The time you retain the target should work like this: No modules : 5 seconds Deprivation on target, nothing on you: 0 seconds Nothing on target, retention module on you: 7.5 seconds Deprivation on target, retention module on you: 2.5 seconds It's not much, but it's never useless if what you want is longer locks.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 23, 2016 22:56
|
|
|
I escaped this games clutches for a while but here I am again, downloading 18 patches and making a bad post. How tall is the Assassin going to be?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 19, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
Skoll posted:Don't get the Assassin. aniviron posted:Probably only about as tall as an Atlas or Banshee. Oh well. And what the gently caress, my Catapults are different and now my laser ones are tiny and hosed up. What's a CPLT-BB? And why do I have some new mechs that looked like they rolled around in motor oil? And is the Awesome still bad? e: I was thinking about giving PGI money but then I saw a rescale before:after video for every mech and   what the gently caress
Sard fucked around with this message at 00:34 on Nov 20, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Yolomon Wayne posted:Ok, im done for today: There's nothing wrong with the best Spider setup, why are you... oh... oh... 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
So I did the dumb thing and finally pulled the trigger on getting an Awesome; I've wanted to get back into once ever since beta ended, and now I have some incentive in the form of attempting to tank my MM tier. I know bracketing is the devil, but are SPLs for defense under 90 meters acceptable on bad idea PPC boats? I've got four PPC and three SPL, but I could get a marginal heat efficiency gain if I consigned myself to death when there are no pubbies around to kill rushing lights.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 22, 2016 23:19
|
|
|
Pattonesque posted:3 SPL aren't going to do more than annoy a rushing light and make you worse at your actual job, which is tossing a million PPCs downrange. I'd take them out and replace with heatsinks or a bigger engine aniviron posted:I have spent a lot of time in my Awesomes, and I would very much recommend ignoring the lasers altogether. Run something like this http://mwo.smurfy-net.de/mechlab#i=14&l=1ce18b7df767834f41b11cdc5d706ca96b0d250a is what I'm running at the moment, but I'll probably move over to the suggested changes, at least outside of solo queue. Maybe a compromise with one in the head; with even 17 DHS I have enough capacity to alpha strike once and the dissipation seems good enough to hold up alternating doubles. Commoners posted:Getting a few small lasers can keep them honest while fighting you, instead of them just planting down in front of you and carefully hitting the same spot over and over again. I would put a single small laser in my PPC blackjack and it saved my rear end a few times. That being said, I still wouldn't use the awesome for ppc sniping. Either do a retard charger 8T, LPL 8T, or LRM 8R. Sard fucked around with this message at 01:04 on Nov 23, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 23, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
NihilCredo posted:Thou hast said it, Ceasiaphas. I have a St Ives Blues, a Panther, aced Trebuchets, a ballistic Puma and more bad things, but the Orion is the first mech I sold after getting basics. You think you want bad, but your soul is not ready for Orion bad.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2016 20:23
|
|
|
I'm looking at getting the X-5 during the sale since I already have a champion Cicada from an event and it looks like a fun light hunter. Am I going to regret that, except for the regret of giving PGI several more dollars? Also looking at the Arrow because maybe this time an MG gimmick mech will be fun, but I get the feeling that's a really dumb idea.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 26, 2016 04:15
|
|
|
Great Beer posted:Its got more hardpoints but it loses the quirks that made the C1 or C4 decent. The only weapon quirk it gets is 10% missile velocity. Yeah I don't really see the point of the Butterbee because if you're running a Catapult built to fight at medium/small energy range, you're running SRMs and the existing Catapults do those better already. Give me a Catapult with ballistic arms, please. I bought the Pirate's Bane and the X-5 and stared longingly at the Pretty Baby, willing it to be good, but that will never happen. Almost got the Arrow but I needed mechbays more. I hope the X-5 ends up being fun with a pair of SRM6+Artemis. e: rocket X-5 is good Sard fucked around with this message at 06:35 on Nov 29, 2016 |
|
#
¿
Nov 29, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
My friend picked up the Atlas mastery bundle and we've been having a lot of fun running a Ghost Dad/AWS-8Q artillery combo, but sometimes I wonder if two Atlas would be even better and then I wake up in a cold sweat.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2016 02:31
|
|
|
No discussion of non-canon mechs is complete without this piece of poo poo..
|
|
#
¿
Dec 4, 2016 01:05
|
|
|
veedubfreak posted:Is that an elemental suit fighting whatever that other thing is. It's some weird IS battle armor that only shows up in that game, and can somehow ~neurohack~ mechs and then pilot them. Don't get me wrong, both MechAssault games were actually fun, but they were so loving weird as BattleTech scenarios.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 4, 2016 09:14
|
|
|
Okay so everything else aside, what are the odds of MWO getting put on UE4 as a result of this MW5 effort? That's the only thing I really care about here, please don't break my heart.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 5, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
Pattonesque posted:we really should shoot legs more often tbh Isn't it old wisdom that legs are the best targets because they can take damage from all sides, negating twists?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 10, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 05:13 |
|
|
Artificer posted:Buff the clans haha
|
|
#
¿
Dec 14, 2016 23:38
|
|