Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Huh...



Must take after his mother.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Lord Koth posted:

Honestly, 27 shells per turret still seems incredibly low, especially given said ammo would need to be split between two, possibly three, types (Type 1 AP, Type 0 HE, possibly some Type 3 AA shells too). Assuming that number doesn't just refer to a single type of shell (in which case where the hell are the other ammo types listed?).


Yep

quote:

Each mounting held 300 rounds with 180 rounds stored in two handling rooms on the rotating structure and the remaining 120 in shell rooms. The practice was to feed projectiles from the lower handling room until the supply was exhausted and then feed from the upper handling room.

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNJAP_18-45_t94.php

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
You know there really aren't that many CAs, I bet I could track down how many are left....

...and then I remember that's how it started last time.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/4aw9zji68rh8ynq/Reference%20V2.04.pdf?dl=0

This is some reference pages someone put together which includes a ship type abbreviation list.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Grey is posting on Hawaii time atm, it happens.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Saint Celestine posted:

....torpedo? From say... a submarine? From say... a country the US is at war with?

Seems a lot more likely than a mine in the middle of the atlantic.

quote:

At 0510 on 13 June, a large sheet of flame and dense smoke were seen rising from the Escanaba, though no explosion was heard by the other ships in the convoy. She sank at 0513, going down so quickly that she did not have time to send any distress signals. Storis and Raritan were ordered to investigate and rescue survivors while the rest of the convoy began zigzagging and steering evasive courses to avoid enemy submarines. Although Storis and Raritan were able to arrive on the scene within ten minutes, only two survivors and one body could be found. At 0715 the two vessels returned to the main body of the convoy, having rescued Boatswain's Mate 2nd Class Melvin A. Baldwin and Seaman 1st Class Raymond F. O'Malley, Jr., and having found the body of LT Prause. The entire crew of 13 officers and 92 men was lost to the explosion or to rapid hypothermia in the 39 °F (4 °C) water with the exception of Baldwin and O'Malley, whose survival was attributed to their soaked clothing having frozen their unconscious bodies to floating debris, which prevented them from following their shipmates to the bottom.

The exact cause of the explosion could not be determined at the time, but was commonly attributed to a torpedo fired by one of several U-Boats which were in the area at the time. However, no U-Boats claimed the kill, and, according to Browning, it is now considered more probable that the cutter was sunk by a drifting mine.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Hey the Caldeon! Thats a really old cruiser begging for the bottom.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

A cunning stunt posted:

Man, every time the Kiddo Butai sorties out, I have to experience the emotional rollercoaster of elation at seeing my lucky ship in the list, followed by the disappointment of realizingd it's the APD and not the DD.

I believe the APD is a refit of the DD

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

A cunning stunt posted:

Perhaps, but I suspect that the Shimakaze we're looking at now is the converted Minekaze-class destroyer from 1920, and not the advanced DD launched in 1943. In real life, the older ship would have been renamed by the time the war started.

Would anybody else be able to clarify?

Looks like it is the older ship, which is listed as having a destroyer transport modification like some of its sister ships.

Guess you'll have to keep waiting.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Donkringel posted:

Can we get a link to that?

https://lparchive.org/Distant-Worlds-Legends/Update%2034/

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
No! Not the pride of the French Navy! You bastard!

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
https://twitter.com/_youhadonejob1/status/905424652595494912


Also please GH get some sort of patrol around Singapore.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
In the beta you could :eng101:

It was in a nested menu you opened from an unrelated production screen. The researchers all had specialties that were poorly documented and tech progress was incredibly slow if there was specialty/subject matter mismatch so it generated complaints from the beta testers. Instead of documenting it they chose to remove the button leading to the research menu leaving it to run, uselessly, in the background.







I'm kidding, obviously the game wasn't beta tested.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Yes, the museum ships of the US are going to have to be light cruisers, memorializing the great Pacific War where they fought to confused victory after the Japanese High Command suddenly surrendered after discovering a mixup ended up turning all their raw materials into engines for out of date scout planes.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
I think the West Virginia is still afloat and you missed her. There should be twice that number of Fletchers in the group which means the other half is off guarding something. Probably the BB as she limps home.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
I think this leaves the Nevada as the last PH Battleship to be a question mark.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Bold Robot posted:

This was probably a bad decision but I picked up WitP during the sale. Out of curiosity, how long does the average turn take?

Based on my past experience with Grey Hunter threads, it averages one a day.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Not gonna lie, I immediately started scanning your bookshelf to judge you.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

gradenko_2000 posted:

Five Japanese warships sunk in Battle of Leyte discovered

The Michishio, the Asagumo, the Yamagumo, the Fuso, and the Yamashiro

Sounds fake. Since the Yamashiro and Fuso's's super structures are a 2.3 km high how could they not know where they sank for 70 years?

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
They’re going to have to import dirt to bury the bodies.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Subchasers were definitely used as convoy escorts, mostly coastal to allow destroyers to work longer routes.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Triggerhappypilot posted:

...instead of doing the logical thing ... on the interface you get absolutely no explanation and have to rely on the spotty manual and the forums.


Evergreen post

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Looking through the ship list it strikes me the safest service is probably submarines, which is hilarious.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_G._O._Squier-class_transport

17.25k tons, holds 3.5k troops. We built 30 of them.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
You can sort them by victory points, which I think is the easiest way to see all the big ships togeather.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

quote:


You would not get me on a landing ship for love nor money.

I think being on a US CA is statistically more likely to kill you.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:

Ok maybe all of this is a distraction and the carriers are taking the long way around through Suez and they'll show up in the East China Sea as part of a surprise attack? I don't know.

Also, I imagine the headlines back in the US read something like "Unemployment Rate Declining Yet Again!"

They're going to sail directly into Tokyo Bay Harbor and open up with their 5" guns.

If only there was some sort of fortress to protect the bay.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Or he missed the carriers entirely and his airwings are butchered when they attack the Iowa class coming in to fail to defend the next attack on Rabaul.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

NGDBSS posted:

Which update was it? I skimmed the Distant Worlds portion but didn't spot anything relevant to that.

https://lparchive.org/Distant-Worlds-Legends/Update%2034/

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Danann posted:

The author of Japanese Destroyer Captain will probably have some good tales of live-training cruiser Katori and his efforts to get her off the front lines already among all the other wild events in Greyverse.

Due to a mixup at HQ the Myoko was listed as training in Balikpan and the Katori was marked as a heavy cruiser for combat. Despite constant complaints and corrections from the field they refused to admit the error.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Memorial Day has reacquainted me with a number of American post war comedies set during the Pacific War. Yeah, that’s not happening.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
I feel like an entire book could be written on the time a Submarine surfaced in a harbor and started taking potshots at Higgens boats.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Grey Hunter posted:

It just feels odd not having any Allied ships on here.

They have sunk the Yamato and the Musashi and intelligence reports state you are unable to build any more super heavy battleships, which are the true terrors of this war. Now all they need to do is successfully invade every island in the Pacific.
The war is finally turning around and the dark days of 1943 and early 1944 are behind us!
Victory by 1950!

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Grey was jealous of the Long March and wanted his own.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

habeasdorkus posted:

Come get stuck in with us! I promise I'll get your boys killed in new, interesting, and gruesome ways!

That's a pretty high standard you're setting for yourself considering the number of interesting and gruesome ways we've seen the Allied AI kill it's pixelmen in this thread.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Grey Hunter posted:

Could be worse, I could be a serial killer.

The Royal Navy laughs bitterly.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

gradenko_2000 posted:

Kamikazes are activated if the Allies own a base within 15 hexes (traced only by sea hexes) of either Tokyo, Takao, or Saigon, and if the date is later than Dec-31-1943.

I'm not sure but maybe Wake Island was enough to activate Kamikazes?

In any case, you're also supposed to convert entire squadrons into Kamikaze-capable squadrons, and you can only convert one squadron per day, and they have to be specifically told to embark on the Kamikaze mission type in order to do carry out these kinds of attacks.

What I'm thinking might have happened is that Kamikazes were activated recently, and the game's code allows for individual Kamikaze attacks if the air combat model produces a plane that decides to do it on the spot as they're crashing or whatever.

There's some dot base around the home islands Gray has ignored for the last 8 months now with a level 9 airfield and B-29s spinning up on the runway as we speak.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

MA-Horus posted:

Like where in the goddamn hell is the Heavy fleet? Just sailing a goddamn convoy of sitting ducks around with no heavy gun or anti-ship support?

And the AI doesn't even have the excuse of being tricked to chase after empty flat tops!

The cruiser night time raid made them afraid to leave port.

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.
Merry Grey Christmas.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

farraday
Jan 10, 2007

Lower those eyebrows, young man. And the other one.

Grey Hunter posted:

I'm not an immortal space Croctapus in real life you know.

Huh, a Paradox mega campaign where the viewpoint isn't the king, but the Immortal Space croctopus sent to earth to "conquer" it after two slight mishaps with a superlaser.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply